Conquer Club

Does the New Yorker's cover really qualify as satire?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Does the New Yorker's cover really qualify as satire?

Postby pimpdave on Tue Jul 22, 2008 4:12 pm

User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class pimpdave
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters

Re: Does the New Yorker's cover really qualify as satire?

Postby heavycola on Tue Jul 22, 2008 5:29 pm

it's great satire. Obama's reaction was rubbish. It made fun of all the stupid people and then he goes and acts like a stupid perosn. Mind you i bet it has the entire dustbowl twisted with confusion.
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Re: Does the New Yorker's cover really qualify as satire?

Postby Snorri1234 on Tue Jul 22, 2008 5:32 pm

I loved that cartoon!
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Re: Does the New Yorker's cover really qualify as satire?

Postby MeDeFe on Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:08 pm

Snorri1234 wrote:I loved that cartoon!

So did I.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Does the New Yorker's cover really qualify as satire?

Postby pimpdave on Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:16 pm

I also thought it was funny, but the article makes a valid point:

--
"By presenting a mad or contemptible partisan sentiment as a mainstream one, by accurately reproducing it and by neglecting to position the target of a slur — the Obamas — in relation to the producers of the slur, The New Yorker seems to have unwittingly reiterated the misconception it meant to lampoon. No wonder so much political humor nowadays contents itself with the smug deriding of the worst aspects of the “other side.” At a time when it is almost impossible to attach a universal meaning to anything, the crossroads linking satire to its target can be very hard to find."
--

So beware the reality of having to play to the lowest common denominator when making a funny, I guess.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class pimpdave
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters

Re: Does the New Yorker's cover really qualify as satire?

Postby Snorri1234 on Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:26 pm

pimpdave wrote:I also thought it was funny, but the article makes a valid point:


I suppose so. I really only know crazy american right-wing fundies from the internet, but seeing as I heard Sean Hannity last week actually saying shit I thought was only restricted to crazies on the internet, it's not that hard to see the problem with this.

Subtle really doesn't work anymore nowadays.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Re: Does the New Yorker's cover really qualify as satire?

Postby Grooveman2007 on Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:13 pm

Yes, the media just overreacted when they saw someone possibly criticizing their God.
The big trouble with dumb bastards is that they are too dumb to believe there is such a thing as being smart.

-Kurt Vonnegut
Private 1st Class Grooveman2007
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 7:08 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Does the New Yorker's cover really qualify as satire?

Postby Neoteny on Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:14 pm

Grooveman2007 wrote:Yes, the media just overreacted when they saw someone possibly criticizing their God.


The media overreacted to the media?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: Does the New Yorker's cover really qualify as satire?

Postby Grooveman2007 on Tue Jul 22, 2008 7:15 pm

Neoteny wrote:
Grooveman2007 wrote:Yes, the media just overreacted when they saw someone possibly criticizing their God.


The media overreacted to the media?


Yup. I remember watching "The Situation Room" the day that issue was published, Wolf Blitzer spent at least 45 min. talking about how the New Yorker was out of line.
The big trouble with dumb bastards is that they are too dumb to believe there is such a thing as being smart.

-Kurt Vonnegut
Private 1st Class Grooveman2007
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 7:08 pm
Location: Minnesota


Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Quirk, WILLIAMS5232