Conquer Club

The Space Shuttle v Concorde (GVFM?)

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

The Space Shuttle v Concorde (GVFM?)

Postby Pedronicus on Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:46 pm

Was the space shuttle a MASSIVE waste of money?
The cost of launching IT with a smaller payload than could be launched by a Saturn V rocket is less cost effective.
The amount of repairs and checks required after each mission, must of equated to a similar outlay of making a brand new (slightly better one) each time.
It was virtually out of date by the time it first made it's maiden flight. Designed in the seventies and still being used in the noughties.

Would you feel safe belting down the motorway doing a ton in a car built in 1982?
Nor me.

Was Concorde a waste of money?
You would of thought that by now airliners would be doing mach 1 as standard.
But after all the millions spent researching it, they only made 20. It was going to be sold in greater numbers to re coup the investment but the oil crisis of the early seventies screwed that plan.
Image
Highest position 7th. Highest points 3311 All of my graffiti can be found here
Major Pedronicus
 
Posts: 2080
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:42 pm
Location: Busy not shitting you....

Re: The Space Shuttle v Concorde (GVFM?)

Postby Juan_Bottom on Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:02 pm

Turns out people care less about speed and more about price. So in that respect, the Concorde was obsolete before it was even built.

Though the Shuttle is going to be retired in 2010, I would say the bigger waste was the Concorde.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Juan_Bottom
 
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: The Space Shuttle v Concorde (GVFM?)

Postby tzor on Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:29 am

The space shuttle was not a "waste" of money. The problem was that with all the disasters the evolution of the shuttle was put on hold. It was no more a "waste" any more than the gemini program was a waste, because it lead to the apollo program and eventually to the moon.

The biggest problem was that the shuttle wasn't designed to go high enough for most practical missions. The next generation would have done that, but that failed to materialize. Most of the problems with shuttle missions stems from the launch site more than the shuttle itself.

The Concorde had two major problems going against it. The first is that it required a longer runway so it was limited to the places where it would land and take off. The second was a NIMBY mentality over supersonic flights over land which limited potential routes. Given its small cargo size, its clientelle would be limited as well. Since these clients were not all located at the limited hubs serviced by the Concorde it's advantage wasn't always all that great.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA


Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users