Moderator: Community Team
shadowsteel9 wrote:They had electric cars in the 40's, My great grandfather drove an electric bus. It was basically like bumper cars, There were 2 large antennas attached to the top of the bus. When they made contact with the metal paths, above the road, The car moved.
btownmeggy wrote:shadowsteel9 wrote:Nope, hydrogen fuel
http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/watercar/h20car2.htm
You silly millie.
ELECTROLYSIS.
Understand what that means?
BUZZZZZZZZZZ.
Now what allows that machine to buzz up the water? Electricity... made from coal, nuclear power, dams.
Now, let's start counting steps.
In order to run a car on hydrogen, you have to BUZZZZZZ the water. You buzz the water with a machine plugged into an electrical grid. The electrical grid gets energy mostly from unclean sources that themselves take HUGE amounts of energy to obtain (drilling for oil, building a nuclear plant and disposing of its waste, building a dam and inadvertently killing wild salmon so we have to farm raise the masses' sushi).
Even if you buzzed the water directly at home, from your own solar cells, you are adding in a wasteful, INEFFICIENT step when current technology for electric engines is MORE EFFECTIVE AND MORE PRACTICAL than hydrogen cells.
The first process shown to us by Rothman Technologies uses water, salt, and an extremely inexpensive metal alloy. The gas that results from this process is pure hydrogen, a fuel that burns without the need for external oxygen — and gives off no pollution whatsoever.
InkL0sed wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Car runs on water- 100 miles on 4 ounces of water
I've heard of that -- it turned out that the guy was just a phony though. Too bad.
shadowsteel9 wrote:I'm not talking about electrolysis, i'm talking about the instant hydrogen they can produce by mixing Salt with Water and running it over a sheet of metal alloy,(i've heard of them using aluminum also).; It causes the water to break apart apd pure hydrogen to be released.The first process shown to us by Rothman Technologies uses water, salt, and an extremely inexpensive metal alloy. The gas that results from this process is pure hydrogen, a fuel that burns without the need for external oxygen — and gives off no pollution whatsoever.
From that page i posted eralier
Juan_Bottom wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:http://www.runyourcarwithwater.com
I found this, and it looks perfectly credible......... maybe???
And what about that guy Fox News reported on? The one who found a way to burn salt water with micro-waves at 8000 degrees? He hasn't tried turning it into a motor though, he just wants to sell the patent.
A quick google on the subject of "Brown's Gas" will show you that this has been repeatedly debunked for over thirty years.
I dunno. That guy seemed legit. Hasn't anyone else seen it?
They even renamed Brown's gas because it had been comprehensively riduculed so often - but I guess we've got to the point where an advert can make us forget that. Try a google with "Brown's Gas" and "debunk". Or don't bother, and join the Flight From Reason.
It wasn't an advertisment, it was a news story. They did a ten minute interview with the guy and he told the story of how he accidently invented it. He was working on cure for cancer, and was trying to use radio waves sent through the body to kill cancer cells. He just wanted to see the effects of the radio waves on different things that make up the human body. Just doing some old fashion wood shop cancer research. Anyway, he even met with the department of defense to sell production rights. I did google Brown's gas, but I'm not certain that they are the same thing.
btownmeggy wrote:shadowsteel9 wrote:I'm not talking about electrolysis, i'm talking about the instant hydrogen they can produce by mixing Salt with Water and running it over a sheet of metal alloy,(i've heard of them using aluminum also).; It causes the water to break apart apd pure hydrogen to be released.The first process shown to us by Rothman Technologies uses water, salt, and an extremely inexpensive metal alloy. The gas that results from this process is pure hydrogen, a fuel that burns without the need for external oxygen — and gives off no pollution whatsoever.
From that page i posted eralier
Did you even read all the text from the link you posted? I'd especially recommend small print at the very bottom that says "Well, ok, it's not ACTUALLY salt. It's a different... kind... of... electrolyte. But maybe salt would work too."
jonesthecurl wrote:Your link took me to an advert, which was about Brown's Gas and said so.
shadowsteel9 wrote:btownmeggy wrote:shadowsteel9 wrote:Nope, hydrogen fuel
http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/watercar/h20car2.htm
You silly millie.
ELECTROLYSIS.
Understand what that means?
BUZZZZZZZZZZ.
Now what allows that machine to buzz up the water? Electricity... made from coal, nuclear power, dams.
Now, let's start counting steps.
In order to run a car on hydrogen, you have to BUZZZZZZ the water. You buzz the water with a machine plugged into an electrical grid. The electrical grid gets energy mostly from unclean sources that themselves take HUGE amounts of energy to obtain (drilling for oil, building a nuclear plant and disposing of its waste, building a dam and inadvertently killing wild salmon so we have to farm raise the masses' sushi).
Even if you buzzed the water directly at home, from your own solar cells, you are adding in a wasteful, INEFFICIENT step when current technology for electric engines is MORE EFFECTIVE AND MORE PRACTICAL than hydrogen cells.
I'm not talking about electrolysis, i'm talking about the instant hydrogen they can produce by mixing Salt with Water and running it over a sheet of metal alloy,(i've heard of them using aluminum also).; It causes the water to break apart apd pure hydrogen to be released.The first process shown to us by Rothman Technologies uses water, salt, and an extremely inexpensive metal alloy. The gas that results from this process is pure hydrogen, a fuel that burns without the need for external oxygen — and gives off no pollution whatsoever.
From that page i posted eralier
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:"The amount of energy in the water molecule is thus vast, and has absolutely nothing to do with the amount of energy it takes to break down that molecule."
LOL Wut?
jonesthecurl wrote:Your link took me to an advert, which was about Brown's Gas and said so.
Juan_Bottom wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:Your link took me to an advert, which was about Brown's Gas and said so.
That was an advert, but that was also a joke. I'm not talking about that dude. Please check out the links that I posted later, the FOX News articles. Sorry about the miscommunication. This other story seems legit.
Frigidus wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:Your link took me to an advert, which was about Brown's Gas and said so.
That was an advert, but that was also a joke. I'm not talking about that dude. Please check out the links that I posted later, the FOX News articles. Sorry about the miscommunication. This other story seems legit.
If it was legit then it would have either been all over the news by this point or been quashed by Big Oil. Again. Considering the news bit hasn't happened, it's either a fake or been buried. Honestly though, I'd guess the former. Seems odd that some chump with some household tools did what teams of scientists have been unable to for years.
Users browsing this forum: Quirk