Conquer Club

Gore

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

If Gore had run, who would you have voted for

 
Total votes : 0

Gore

Postby shadowsteel9 on Sun May 25, 2008 9:33 pm

Ok, there's been alot of talk about the elections, and I personally believe that this wouldn't be the case if Gore had run for president. he would have walked from state to state collecting all the delegates.
After discussing the political minds of my area, we have come to the conclusion that if noone ends up with enough delegates by the convention, after the first vote, Gore will announce his candidacy for president. The delegates will flock to him, and the ticket will be Gore Obama. then after Gore's 2 terms, Obama will have the experience people claim he doesnt' have now. and he'll run in 2016.

Tell me what you think
User avatar
Corporal shadowsteel9
 
Posts: 145
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:33 pm
Location: the moment

Re: Gore

Postby InkL0sed on Sun May 25, 2008 9:35 pm

I think I probably would have voted for Gore at the time... but if I had known all that I know now, probably Obama.
User avatar
Lieutenant InkL0sed
 
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: underwater

Re: Gore

Postby Caleb the Cruel on Sun May 25, 2008 10:26 pm

GO CLINTON!

Let's elect the first woman president!
Let's make history!
She has experience & new ideas, the perfect combination bundled up into one wonderful woman!






Note: Come this fall, I will be voting for moderate McCain. ;)
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Caleb the Cruel
 
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 8:36 pm
Location: Northern Colorado

Re: Gore

Postby got tonkaed on Sun May 25, 2008 11:55 pm

Caleb the Cruel wrote:GO CLINTON!

Let's elect the first woman president!
Let's make history!
She has experience & new ideas, the perfect combination bundled up into one wonderful woman!






Note: Come this fall, I will be voting for moderate McCain. ;)


ill admit it...i find it kind of funny that in another thread you lament about important services that you wish the gov. would spend money on to help alleviate certain issues, and yet you seem staunchly ready to support the candidate who is probably the least interested in any of the issues that you mentioned in that post.
User avatar
Cadet got tonkaed
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Gore

Postby Iceoasis11 on Mon May 26, 2008 3:09 am

Caleb the Cruel wrote:GO CLINTON!

Let's elect the first woman president!
Let's make history!
She has experience & new ideas, the perfect combination bundled up into one wonderful woman!


She may have exerperiance but do we really want a president whose a condenscending, lying. conceited, stuck up, uptight, worn out woman?

The only thing about her i approve of is her healthcare plan.

Gore totally should have run. He's the only one paying attention to some of the imediate global warming issues. I mean sure he exagertes them but the people in DC need that exageration to encourage them to act up. but yeah go Green!
User avatar
New Recruit Iceoasis11
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 2:36 am
Location: MA

Re: Gore

Postby borox0 on Mon May 26, 2008 3:50 am

Gore has some pretty extreme ideas though. Most of the people I know don't believe in global warming.
I'm pretty sure there's a lot more to life than being really, really, ridiculously good looking. And I plan on finding out what that is.
User avatar
Cadet borox0
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 3:11 pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: Gore

Postby Snorri1234 on Mon May 26, 2008 10:34 am

shadowsteel9 wrote:Ok, there's been alot of talk about the elections, and I personally believe that this wouldn't be the case if Gore had run for president. he would have walked from state to state collecting all the delegates.
After discussing the political minds of my area, we have come to the conclusion that if noone ends up with enough delegates by the convention, after the first vote, Gore will announce his candidacy for president. The delegates will flock to him, and the ticket will be Gore Obama. then after Gore's 2 terms, Obama will have the experience people claim he doesnt' have now. and he'll run in 2016.

Tell me what you think


I'd support a Gore/Obama ticket. But I'm not so aware of what Gore's policies were the first time.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Re: Gore

Postby Ray Rider on Mon May 26, 2008 11:12 am

Much as I disagree with the Clintons, Hillary would be better than Obama or Gore (man is he ever a hypocrite on global warming!).

By the way, according to the GOP, Obama has promised to spend $850 billion, and Hillary has promised $880 billion. Have the Democrats kept track of how much McCain has promised to spend?
Image
Image
Highest score: 2221
User avatar
Major Ray Rider
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: In front of my computer, duh!

Re: Gore

Postby got tonkaed on Mon May 26, 2008 12:01 pm

Ray Rider wrote:Much as I disagree with the Clintons, Hillary would be better than Obama or Gore (man is he ever a hypocrite on global warming!).

By the way, according to the GOP, Obama has promised to spend $850 billion, and Hillary has promised $880 billion. Have the Democrats kept track of how much McCain has promised to spend?


It was a long time ago (a few months maybe) but i remember seeing something in newsweek magazine that had obama's numbers much lower than that. I think the notable thing was that they were all spending fairly similar amounts (when you consider the size of the amount) but that there were pretty different ways in which that money was spent.
User avatar
Cadet got tonkaed
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Gore

Postby Snorri1234 on Mon May 26, 2008 12:19 pm

Ray Rider wrote:Much as I disagree with the Clintons, Hillary would be better than Obama or Gore (man is he ever a hypocrite on global warming!).

By the way, according to the GOP, Obama has promised to spend $850 billion, and Hillary has promised $880 billion. Have the Democrats kept track of how much McCain has promised to spend?


More importantly, is there also someone who keeps track of how much the candidates promise to save? Because as McCain will stay in Iraq for ever, any promise of not spending a lot should be adjusted for the amount of money he is indirectly promising on spending.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Re: Gore

Postby rhoges6 on Mon May 26, 2008 12:53 pm

borox0 wrote:Gore has some pretty extreme ideas though. Most of the people I know don't believe in global warming.


Really? What's it like living in the 18th century?
User avatar
Cook rhoges6
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: new england

Re: Gore

Postby Napoleon Ier on Mon May 26, 2008 1:00 pm

got tonkaed wrote:
Ray Rider wrote:Much as I disagree with the Clintons, Hillary would be better than Obama or Gore (man is he ever a hypocrite on global warming!).

By the way, according to the GOP, Obama has promised to spend $850 billion, and Hillary has promised $880 billion. Have the Democrats kept track of how much McCain has promised to spend?


It was a long time ago (a few months maybe) but i remember seeing something in newsweek magazine that had obama's numbers much lower than that. I think the notable thing was that they were all spending fairly similar amounts (when you consider the size of the amount) but that there were pretty different ways in which that money was spent.


Aye, I saw Hillary at 300bn and Obama at 800bn, with McCain lagging at 200bn.
Le Roy est mort: Vive le Roy!

Dieu et mon Pays.
User avatar
Cadet Napoleon Ier
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Re: Gore

Postby got tonkaed on Mon May 26, 2008 2:05 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:
got tonkaed wrote:
Ray Rider wrote:Much as I disagree with the Clintons, Hillary would be better than Obama or Gore (man is he ever a hypocrite on global warming!).

By the way, according to the GOP, Obama has promised to spend $850 billion, and Hillary has promised $880 billion. Have the Democrats kept track of how much McCain has promised to spend?


It was a long time ago (a few months maybe) but i remember seeing something in newsweek magazine that had obama's numbers much lower than that. I think the notable thing was that they were all spending fairly similar amounts (when you consider the size of the amount) but that there were pretty different ways in which that money was spent.


Aye, I saw Hillary at 300bn and Obama at 800bn, with McCain lagging at 200bn.


bolded for the part where i think you and i were reading different sources.
User avatar
Cadet got tonkaed
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Gore

Postby dustn64 on Mon May 26, 2008 2:08 pm

manbearpig?
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class dustn64
 
Posts: 4683
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: The Birthplace of Basketball


Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users