Where can I play a hasbro version of Risk online

by **crussrealestate** on Sun May 25, 2008 1:04 pm

I downloaded risk and enjoyede the play for about 10 minutes and realized the game was too. Easy is there a forum like Habros game that you can play with multiple players that is fast paced.

by **Herakilla** on Sun May 25, 2008 1:06 pm

this belongs in chatter box if it doesnt get locked

and as for your question, get the risk 2 cd if you can find it anywhere

by **AndyDufresne** on Sun May 25, 2008 1:17 pm

Moved on over. Who needs Hasbro Risk, when we've got great World Domination here?

--Andy

by **Pedronicus** on Sun May 25, 2008 1:19 pm

Hasbro Risk would have random dice. That's why :^o

by **Snorri1234** on Sun May 25, 2008 1:33 pm

crussrealestate wrote:I downloaded risk and enjoyede the play for about 10 minutes and realized the game was too. Easy is there a forum like Habros game that you can play with multiple players that is fast paced.

I like the punctuation. There

by **Johnny Rockets** on Sun May 25, 2008 2:02 pm

The game itself is not to bad, ( dice that function like they are supposed to.. )
but you better like the classic map a LOT. Like obsessively love it.
The online feature is cool, but finding a hosting room or other players over the net is next to impossible. Thus it be a lame poor substitution for Conquer Club.

J

by **oVo** on Sun May 25, 2008 2:04 pm

That is indeed excellent.punctuation. Pedro we have random dice. here.

don't you just hate passing out in General Discussion and waking up in the Chatterbox?

by **suggs** on Sun May 25, 2008 2:16 pm

In response to your quote:

Why anyone, EVER, would want to spend more than 30 secs in General Discussion is a TOTAL FUCKING MYSTERY to me.
"Ooo, the dice are unfair" *Ooo, Cairnswk has designed another shit map", ooo "fortifications". Intensely dull.

by **t-o-m** on Sun May 25, 2008 2:25 pm

suggs wrote:In response to your quote:

Why anyone, EVER, would want to spend more than 30 secs in General Discussion is a TOTAL FUCKING MYSTERY to me.
"Ooo, the dice are unfair" *Ooo, Cairnswk has designed another shit map", ooo "fortifications". Intensely dull.

ahh, so thats why owenshooter hangs out there

and dont 'dis Cairns! :evil:

by **cairnswk** on Sun May 25, 2008 3:21 pm

t-o-m wrote:
suggs wrote:In response to your quote:

Why anyone, EVER, would want to spend more than 30 secs in General Discussion is a TOTAL FUCKING MYSTERY to me.
"Ooo, the dice are unfair" *Ooo, Cairnswk has designed another shit map", ooo "fortifications". Intensely dull.

ahh, so thats why owenshooter hangs out there

and dont 'dis Cairns!

no...i don't believe suggs is disin' me. he's entitled to his opinion.

by **suggs** on Sun May 25, 2008 4:59 pm

In fact, Cairns designed my fav map, Battle for Oz.
Tho i really do think his new Schloss one is awful rubbish.

But i was dissing him, because I've never really forgiven him for cheating in a game a while back.
Still, awfully nice cheat, I'm sure

by **t-o-m** on Sun May 25, 2008 5:01 pm

suggs wrote:In fact, Cairns designed my fav map, Battle for Oz.
Tho i really do think his new Schloss one is awful rubbish.

But i was dissing him, because I've never really forgiven him for cheating in a game a while back.
Still, awfully nice cheat, I'm sure

lol!
what did he do?

and i love das schloss - ive won 2/2 times!

by **suggs** on Sun May 25, 2008 5:04 pm

Ah, I'm being petty really.
But someone set up an experimental escalating World 2.1 game, and it was agreed that no one would try and win, the guy who set up the game, just wanted to see how high escalating cards went.
Predictably, one cheating cnt decided to get some free points out of it -and that cheating cnt was cairns.
He never apologised, so he is cock of the first order, in a nice non flaming sort of way.

by **Snorri1234** on Sun May 25, 2008 5:07 pm

suggs wrote:Ah, I'm being petty really.
But someone set up an experimental escalating World 2.1 game, and it was agreed that no one would try and win, the guy who set up the game, just wanted to see how high escalating cards went.
Predictably, one cheating cnt decided to get some free points out of it -and that cheating cnt was cairns.
He never apologised, so he is cock of the first order, in a nice non flaming sort of way.

Suggs, lovely as you. Are I must ask you what in earth you are talking about?

by **suggs** on Sun May 25, 2008 5:08 pm

Just an old grudge against Cockwk.
He cheated, and never apologised, thus=he sucks salty balls. Nice bloke tho.

by **fireedud** on Sun May 25, 2008 8:44 pm

suggs wrote:Ah, I'm being petty really.
But someone set up an experimental escalating World 2.1 game, and it was agreed that no one would try and win, the guy who set up the game, just wanted to see how high escalating cards went.
Predictably, one cheating cnt decided to get some free points out of it -and that cheating cnt was cairns.
He never apologised, so he is cock of the first order, in a nice non flaming sort of way.

I remember, that was the game I set up. I hates Cairns for about two weeks, but then I loved him again ( I could never hold long grudges).

by **InkL0sed** on Sun May 25, 2008 10:26 pm

fireedud wrote:
suggs wrote:Ah, I'm being petty really.
But someone set up an experimental escalating World 2.1 game, and it was agreed that no one would try and win, the guy who set up the game, just wanted to see how high escalating cards went.
Predictably, one cheating cnt decided to get some free points out of it -and that cheating cnt was cairns.
He never apologised, so he is cock of the first order, in a nice non flaming sort of way.

I remember, that was the game I set up. I hates Cairns for about two weeks, but then I loved him again ( I could never hold long grudges).

Haha, yeah that was funny stuff.