Hitman079 wrote:does anyone have any feedback/suggestions/ comments for me?
I must admit I haven't read very much of your story yet, just the first two chapters, but I'll give you a few pointers that might or might not be helpful anyway.
Use words that fit, arrows don't "materialize", especially not when the archers are mentioned 2 sentences later.
Don't be afraid of strong verbs, "to slink" goes "slink, slunk, slunk"
Also don't be afraid of gender pronouns, one applicant is not "their". 'His' or 'her' will do fine, just decide which sex you want your victim to be.
I think it's usually bad form to use the protagonists name too often, especially if noone else has been mentioned between two uses, if he does one thing in one sentence and then something happens to him in the next, use 'he', it's not a dirty word, after a few "hes" you can use his name again, though, because too many "hes" is bad form as well, it's mostly about balancing things out.
Check your grammatical constructions again, "but now also increased was the danger of...", is correct, but contrasts too starkly with the language you used before.
In a hectic situation, fast sentences do the best job of conveying the right feeling. "To his horror, he could smell copper- which only meant he had slipped on the newly-made corpse's blood." is already somewhat too long imo, "Horrified, he could smell something like copper - he had slipped in the fresh corpse's blood." says exactly the same thing but you save yourself half a sentence of whichs and means, which add nothing to the plot or the mood.
The last point holds for practically everything, see if you can find any pronouns, conjunctions, disjunctions and in general words that only have a grammatical meaning that aren't absolutely necessary, and rewrite the sentence without them. They make for tedious reading.
Here's one example: "Silas was surprised, not by the threat on his life itself, but the simple presence of the weapon." Leave out 'itself', it doesn't add anything to the sentence, also, I think it's "threat against" and I would add a "by" in the last part since it's a separate subordinate clause and not grammatically dependent on "not by ... life itself".
Sure, this is only a small example but they tend to add up, so the fewer of them the better.
So: "Silas was surprised, not by the threat against his life, but by the simple presence of the weapon."
It's just a small change, but I feel that it's slightly easier to read. Multiply a slight improvement by 10000 sentences in a relatively short story and you end up with quite a lot. In literature, the details really DO matter.
I've read a quote that goes along the lines of "a long book is usually long because the author didn't have the time to make it short". It might be something to take to heart.