bedub1 wrote:Of course it's not applicable to everybody. But thats why I like the Freedom of Choice. You can choose what you do and don't want to pay for. Instead of just being taxed at a crazy rate and given a piece of shit healthcare....
I like to CHOOSE what I want...instead of it being forced upon me.
dont get me wrong, as a single individual there are alot of attractive alternatives to an idea of a national healthcare system, especially as a healthy individual.
However, you dont solve social problems by thinking about self interest. As much as napoelon likes to think it would solve everything, any evidence of praxis we have which gives insight seems to suggest it does not.
By blaming the victims so to speak for not getting healthcare, you are simply assuming everyone would have the same access to healthcare that you as a single indivdual would have. Certainly there are likely some people who do fail to make the most of their oppertunities, however it seems much more likely most people are not.
In a system where at the end of the day the goal is to make money, you are going to have some difficulties with social aspects of those who cannot pay. As a result we have a lot of people who are falling through the gaps. Your type of rationale rather contributes to this dilemma, instead working toward solving it.