by kwanton on Thu Jun 07, 2007 4:59 pm
FILIBUSTER
My complaint about other thing's than picnics owning a hill
I've been doing a lot of meditating and praying lately and this has helped me collect my thoughts and organize them into the letter you're about to read. One of the first facts we should face is that many people are convinced that we need to settle our disputes with rational discussion -- not by moral huffing and puffing. I can't comment on that, but I can say that this is a free country, and I aver we ought to keep it that way. If other thing's than picnics owning a hill continues to make conditions far worse than could ever have been the case without its scary efforts, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets. Other thing's than picnics owning a hill's sound bites are just a rhetorical ploy to get away from the obvious fact that other thing's than picnics owning a hill thinks it's good that its commentaries twist the truth. It is difficult to know how to respond to such monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: It truly believes that might makes right. It is just such gutless, unsympathetic megalomania, snippy egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs other thing's than picnics owning a hill to weaken our mental and moral fiber. Comstockism doesn't work. So why does other thing's than picnics owning a hill cling to it? To turn that question around, why doesn't other thing's than picnics owning a hill try doing something constructive for once in its history? That is, is other thing's than picnics owning a hill's incessant burbling about the wonders of feudalism supposed to convince us that prissy, salacious prima donnas are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive? I could give you the answer now, but it would be more productive for me first to inform you that even when the facts don't fit, it sometimes tries to use them anyway. It still maintains, for instance, that everything is happy and fine and good.
So don't tell me that other thing's than picnics owning a hill controls a secret underground empire just because its refrains blend cruel, oligophrenic post-structuralism (manifested in a sniffish stance) with a purported support for environmentalism, trade unionism, and the dignity of labor. But I digress. Other thing's than picnics owning a hill's jibes are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that we should derive moral guidance from other thing's than picnics owning a hill's glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented undertakings. And they promote the mistaken idea that splenetic porn stars have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us. If other thing's than picnics owning a hill thinks that it can make me run around like a chicken with its head cut off, then it's barking up the wrong tree. I am a law-and-order kind of person. I hate to see crimes go unpunished. That's why I clearly hope that other thing's than picnics owning a hill serves a long prison term for its illegal attempts to trample over the very freedoms and rights that it claims to support.
There can be no doubt that I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because once people obtain the critical skills that enable them to think and reflect and speculate independently, they'll realize that I have a plan to carry out this matter to the full extent of the law. I call this plan "Operation lift our nation from the quicksand of injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that other thing's than picnics owning a hill's hired goons are too lazy to begin a course of careful, planned, and coordinated action. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that everything I've said so far is by way of introduction to the key point I want to make in this letter. My key point is that other thing's than picnics owning a hill is thoroughly mistaken if it believes that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Why am I furious? Because other thing's than picnics owning a hill has a hidden agenda. That's the sort of statement that some people maintain is shabby, but which I believe is merely a statement of fact. And it's a statement that needs to be made, because other thing's than picnics owning a hill's flunkies argue that it is a spokesman for God. These are the same oppressive numskulls who declare that this is the best of all possible worlds and that it is the best of all possible organizations. This is no coincidence; when I was a child, my clergyman told me, "I, not being one of the many self-serving, oleaginous tax cheats of this world, know how most of you feel." If you think about it you'll see his point. And why am I embarrassed? Because other thing's than picnics owning a hill has been doing "in-depth research" (whatever it thinks that means) to prove that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive. I should mention that I've been doing some research of my own. So far, I've "discovered" that other thing's than picnics owning a hill is consistently inconsistent. But you knew that already. So let me add that other thing's than picnics owning a hill refuses to come to terms with reality. It prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination. One can examine this from another angle and plainly see that I call upon other thing's than picnics owning a hill to stop its oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon it to be an organization of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon it to forgo its desire to make us too confused, demoralized, and disunited to put up an effective opposition to its announcements. At the very least, other thing's than picnics owning a hill thinks I'm trying to say that its blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. Wait! I just heard something. Oh, never mind; it's just the sound of the point zooming way over other thing's than picnics owning a hill's head. This should be a chance to examine and bring problems to light, to share and join in understanding, but other thing's than picnics owning a hill's canards are based on hate. Hate, Lysenkoism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life.
Other thing's than picnics owning a hill's perspective is that newspapers should report only on items it agrees with. My perspective, in contrast, is that other thing's than picnics owning a hill's views are antiquated, misguided, and brutal. Regular readers of my letters probably take that for granted, but if I am to tackle the multinational death machine that other thing's than picnics owning a hill is currently constructing, I must explain to the population at large that other thing's than picnics owning a hill's behavior might be different if it were told that that's why I laugh when I hear its henchmen go on and on about antiheroism. Of course, as far as other thing's than picnics owning a hill's concerned, this fact will fall into the category of, "My mind is made up; don't confuse me with the facts." That's why I'm telling you that every so often, you'll see it lament, flog itself, cry mea culpa for seeking to blow the whole situation way out of proportion, and vow never again to be so pouty. Sadly, it always reverts to its old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that it fervently believes that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. This shows that it is not merely mistaken about one little fact among millions of facts but that at this point in the letter, I had planned to tell you that other thing's than picnics owning a hill has always favored providing a privileged and protected status for the worst kinds of ghastly cadgers there are. However, one of my colleagues pointed out that it goes ga-ga for any type of hooliganism you can think of. Hence, I discarded the discourse I had previously prepared and substituted the following discussion, in which I argue that other thing's than picnics owning a hill's voiced intentions don't match its actual intentions. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that the pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward deconstructionism? In my effort to uncover other thing's than picnics owning a hill's hidden prejudices, I will need to improve the lot of humankind. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that it regards itself as both omniscient and omnicompetent, fully qualified to put any intellectual discipline in the world in its place? Here's the answer, albeit in a somewhat circuitous and roundabout style: If I had to choose between chopping onions and helping it let down ladders which the insecure, conceited, and vitriolic scramble to climb, I'd be in the kitchen in an instant. Although both alternatives make me cry, the deciding factor for me is that other thing's than picnics owning a hill's musings are designed to attack everyone else's beliefs. And they're working; they're having the desired effect.
This is not Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, where the state would be eager to develop mind-control technology. Not yet, at least. But if other thing's than picnics owning a hill can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt take away our sense of community and leave us morally adrift", I will personally deliver its Nobel Prize for Dodgy Rhetoric. In the meantime, there's something fishy about other thing's than picnics owning a hill's metanarratives. I think it's up to something, something unpatriotic and perhaps even amateurish. Considering that other thing's than picnics owning a hill's secret agents amount to nothing more than supercilious hoodlums riding on the back of a social fungus attacking the body politic, I find it almost laughable how it remains oblivious to the fact that if a cogent, logical argument entered its brain, no doubt a concussion would result.
I recently overheard a couple of cold-blooded scroungers say that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. Here, again, we encounter the blurred thinking that is characteristic of this other thing's than picnics owning a hill-induced era of slogans and propaganda. If, today, the urge of other thing's than picnics owning a hill's war-soul can prompt it to place stumbling blocks in front of those of us who seek value and fulfilment in our personal and professional lives, then imagine, if you can, how that same soul will express itself through the thousandfold-more-naive other thing's than picnics owning a hill of tomorrow. If other thing's than picnics owning a hill wants to be taken seriously, it should counter the arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal anecdotes, or insults. For those of us who make our living trying to maximize our individual potential for effectiveness and success in combatting other thing's than picnics owning a hill, it is important to consider that it operates on an international scale to use mass organization as a system of integration and control. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to take advantage of a rare opportunity to criticize other thing's than picnics owning a hill's complicity in the widespread establishment of separatism. Currently, other thing's than picnics owning a hill's theories merely develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to embark on a new path towards change. As you will see sooner than you think, this is only the tip of a gigantic iceberg.
While these incidents may seem minor, other thing's than picnics owning a hill's perorations are not an abstract problem. They have very concrete, immediate, and unpleasant consequences. For instance, there isn't a man, woman, or child alive today who thinks that everything other thing's than picnics owning a hill says is completely and totally true, so let's toss out that ridiculous argument of other thing's than picnics owning a hill's from the get-go. To state it in a more sophisticated manner, other thing's than picnics owning a hill is an opportunist. That is, it is an ideological chameleon, without any real morality, without a soul. Other thing's than picnics owning a hill recently went through a Pyrrhonism phase in which it tried repeatedly to have more impact on Earth's biological, geological, and chemical systems during our lifetime and our children's than all preceding human generations had together. In fact, I'm not convinced that this phase of its has entirely passed. My evidence is that other thing's than picnics owning a hill spouts the same bile in everything it writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue it's excited about this week is sexism, which says to me that other thing's than picnics owning a hill somehow manages to maintain a straight face when saying that it is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha. I am greatly grieved by this occurrence of falsehood and fantastic storytelling which is the resultant of layers of social dishevelment and disillusionment amongst the fine citizens of a once organized, motivated, and cognitively enlightened civilization. According to other thing's than picnics owning a hill's distortions, distractions, and outright deceptions, incendiarism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. Fortunately, most of the people who are seriously interested in preserving our civilization know that the reality is that other thing's than picnics owning a hill's argument is invalid. It is no more complicated than that.
There is something grievously wrong with those superficial, chthonic low-lifes who spawn delusions of solipsism's resplendence. Shame on the lot of them! Other thing's than picnics owning a hill's propositions are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk" -- an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well -- because if other thing's than picnics owning a hill were paying attention -- which it would seem it is not, as I've already gone over this -- it'd see that if it can't be reasoned out of its prejudices, it must be laughed out of them. If it can't be argued out of its selfishness, it must be shamed out of it. How can we trust a pushy bonehead who actively conceals its true intentions? We can't. And besides, other thing's than picnics owning a hill's perversions can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that other thing's than picnics owning a hill's scare tactics are like an enormous denominationalism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now, because other thing's than picnics owning a hill's mind has limited horizons. It is confined to the immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal and basic and is then leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life.
The law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. Other thing's than picnics owning a hill seizes every opportunity to force us to adopt rigid social roles that compromise our inner code of ethics. I cannot believe this colossal clownishness. Any sane person knows that if you're interested in the finagling, double-dealing, chicanery, cheating, cajolery, cunning, rascality, and abject villainy by which other thing's than picnics owning a hill may disguise the complexity of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and sexual identity in the construction and practice of McCarthyism before you know it, then you'll want to consider the following very carefully. You'll especially want to consider that other thing's than picnics owning a hill is not only immoral, but amoral. I have a message for other thing's than picnics owning a hill. My message is that, for the good of us all, it should never rip apart causes that others feel strongly about. It should never even try to do such a pharisaical thing. To make myself perfectly clear, by "never", I don't mean "maybe", "sometimes", or "it depends". I mean only that other thing's than picnics owning a hill is the embodiment of everything petty in our lives. Every grievance, every envy, every two-faced ideology finds expression in other thing's than picnics owning a hill.
Not only have perfidious sociopaths decided to glorify their grievances by dressing them up as moral and righteous prerogatives, but their rejoinders are being debated as though they were actually reasonable. Anyone who has spent much time wading through the pious, obscurantist, jargon-filled cant that now passes for "advanced" thought in the humanities already knows that as soon as other thing's than picnics owning a hill's hirelings dominate or intimidate others, they will have destroyed the basis for their own existence. What may be news, however, is that perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of nutty, uncompromising power brokers. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. Other thing's than picnics owning a hill would do well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being goofy. I would really like to comment on other thing's than picnics owning a hill's attempt to associate factionalism with solecism. There is no association. This letter has gone on far too long, in my opinion, and probably yours as well. So let me end it by saying merely that other thing's than picnics owning a hill is off its trolley.
Still picnic hill!
Click the Esoog!
