Shout random crap at the person above/below you

[cena-rules]

thanks for the berries

[size=0]and middlesbrough thanks portsmouth for the yak[/size]

[sam_levi_11]

thanks for the berries

[size=0]and middlesbrough thanks portsmouth for the yak[/size]

lolol, good player

[Norse]

thanks for the berries

[size=0]and middlesbrough thanks portsmouth for the yak[/size]

lolol, good player

Silence!

the pair of you!

He only scored penalties for us, doesn't seem to be lifting boro's manky footballing progress...Bah!

[cena-rules]

thanks for the berries

[size=0]and middlesbrough thanks portsmouth for the yak[/size]

lolol, good player

Silence!

the pair of you!

He only scored penalties for us, doesn't seem to be lifting boro's manky footballing progress...Bah!

manky?

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJU_PNWREGE
3-0 down 4-3 up
boro for the UEFA cup
3-0 down 4-3 up
geordies at home are sick as f*ck

WE SHALL OVERCOME

[Norse]

You numpty....please tell us what happened in the final...


Sick at home? Don't be stupid...please remind me of your last home game versus pompey....4-0 to us right?

sick at home, fakkin bullshitter

[muy_thaiguy]

This is supposed to be random crap!

[DAZMCFC]

it is random crap. random football crap. the boro are shit and so is pompey.

[Norse]

it is random crap. random football crap. the boro are shit and so is pompey.

hahaha, sven goran erikson is gonna f*ck your chances up

[cena-rules]

it is random crap. random football crap. the boro are shit and so is pompey.

hahaha, sven goran erikson is gonna f*ck your chances up

i applaud your logic

[muy_thaiguy]

you all suck cock

[MeDeFe]

R A N D O M C R A P !

[cena-rules]

RANDOM CARP

THAT IS NOT A SPELLING MISTAKE I MEANT RANDOM CARP

[Beastly]

iliad can't keep his flames in flame wars...

[MeDeFe]

The following are simply some random thoughts that have been rattling about my head of late and that I'd like to let out -- a little house cleaning, if you will. Let's get down to business: There's an important difference between me and Beastly. Namely, I am willing to die for my cause. Beastly, in contrast, is willing to kill for her -- or, if not to kill, at least to discourage us from expressing our bruta fulmina in whatever way we damn well please. If you were to try to tell her functionaries that as commonly encountered, sniffish four-flushers lack any of the qualities that mark the civilized person, like courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, and confidence, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that if Beastly wants to complain, she should have an argument. she shouldn't just throw out the word "antitintinnabularian", for example, and expect us to be scared. Today, as yesterday, I must admit that I've read only a small fraction of her writings. (As a well-known aphorism states, it is not necessary to eat all of an apple to learn that it is rotten.) Nevertheless, I've read enough of Beastly's writings to know that I, not being one of the many disgraceful, oligophrenic barrators of this world, have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people. I can therefore assure you that when Beastly says that the few of us who complain regularly about her metanarratives are simply spoiling the party, that's just a load of spucatum tauri. Mass anxiety is the equivalent of steroids for Beastly. If we feel helpless, Beastly is energized and ramps up her efforts to reduce human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine.

Just wait until someone gets hurt as a result of Beastly's publications. Then, more people will agree that if she can overawe and befuddle a sufficient number of prominent individuals, then it will become virtually impossible for anyone to put to rest grotesque and uncivilized undertakings such as Beastly's. Beastly's rantings have no basis in science or in human experience. Instead, they consist of unsympathetic morals derived from a world view rooted in filthy favoritism.

If there is one truth in this world, it's that Beastly sees no reason why she shouldn't generate an epidemic of corruption and social unrest. It is only through an enlightened, outraged citizenry that such moral turpitude, corruption, and degradation of the law can be brought to a halt. So, let me enlighten and outrage you by stating that some reputed -- as opposed to reputable -- members of Beastly's peuplade quite adamantly claim that the Universe belongs to Beastly by right. I find it rather astonishing that anyone could believe such a thing, but then again, Nature is a wonderful teacher. For instance, the lesson that Nature teaches us from newly acephalous poultry is that you really don't need a brain to run around like a dang fool making a spectacle of yourself. Nature also teaches us that Beastly must have some sort of problem with reading comprehension. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why Beastly accuses me of admitting that going through the motions of working is the same as working. What I actually said is that we must learn to celebrate our diversity, not because it is the politically correct thing to do, but because her tracts are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called "lying". This probably does not affect your daily life, but it is a fact. The greatest quote I ever heard goes something like this: "By exploiting social discontent and promising a golden age of 'human brotherhood', Beastly will be successful in her attempts to condone universal oppression." she thinks it's good that her blanket statements bring about a wonderland of sectarianism. It is difficult to know how to respond to such monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: she sees herself as a postmodern equivalent of Marx's proletariat, revolutionizing the world by wresting it from its oppressors (viz., those who encourage opportunity, responsibility, and community). I've always thought that I mention that in this spot because of its close connection with the item just above, and hearing the rubbish that Beastly spews forth proves it beyond all doubt. That's our situation today, in very rough outline. Of course, I've left out a thousand details and refinements and qualifications. I've not mentioned that this theme is stated in one form or another in every one of Man's great religions. And I've ignored parasitism altogether. I've simply pointed out one key fact: People like Beastly are beyond help.

[Beastly]

[Norse]

There are some things better kept to yourself...play-doe girl.

[Skittles!]

He said give it up boy
Give it up
Or you're gonna die.

[cena-rules]

playdoh and fries please

[Beastly]

And yet still after all is said in done, you all have yet to actually touch on the most pressing subject of MeDeFe.

Once again, I find it necessary to write in defense of myself and my beliefs. The first thing I want to bring up is that MeDeFe has announced his intentions to force square pegs into round holes. While doing so may earn MeDeFe a gold star from the mush-for-brains antagonism crowd, his favorite tactic is known as "deceiving with the truth". The idea behind this tactic is that MeDeFe wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to reveal the truth about his squibs. If you think about it, he possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, he can't even spell or define "erudition", much less achieve it. MeDeFe has been known to say that he is beyond reproach. That notion is so resentful, I hardly know where to begin refuting it.

What we have been imparting to MeDeFe -- or what he has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge. His patter is smooth and quite practiced. He can fast-talk you into believing you'd be better off if you participated in his effort to fix blame for social stress, economic loss, or loss of political power on a target group whose constructed guilt provides a simplistic explanation. However, MeDeFe doctrines fall apart upon reflection. I attribute the social and psychological problems of modern society to the fact that if I didn't think he would break down age-old institutions and customs, I wouldn't say that he likes to posture as a guardian of virtue and manners. However, when it comes right down to it, what MeDeFe is pushing is both ill-bred and witless.

MeDeFe is not a responsible citizen. Responsible citizens present another paradigm in opposition to his treacherous threats. Responsible citizens certainly do not promote a form of government in which religious freedom, racial equality, and individual liberty are severely at risk. While he is truly entitled to ignore good advice from intelligent people, we are at a crossroads. One road leads into the light of a bright, shining future in which lecherous degenerates like MeDeFe are absolutely absent. The other road leads into the darkness of antidisestablishmentarianism. The question, therefore, is: Who's driving the bus? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that if you ever ask MeDeFe to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed. Couldn't you figure that out for yourself, MeDeFe?

Unfortunately, the English language contains so few words of reprobation and invective that I cannot satisfactorily describe MeDeFe caustic suggestions. At least our language's lexicon is sufficiently voluminous for me to explain that it seems that no one else is telling you that MeDeFe's whitewash of the issue offers no real analysis of the situation that resulted in his empty-headed shenanigans in the first place. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, the only weapons MeDeFe has in his intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all he has, and he knows it. Would we, as thinking people, believe spongers who tried to tell us we're all slatternly? I say "no."

Now, I'm no fan of MeDeFe, but still, inasmuch as I disagree with MeDeFe accusations and find his ad hominem attacks offensive, I am happy to meet MeDeFe''s speech with more speech and, if necessary, continue this discussion until the truth shines. I find that some of MeDeFe choices of words in his solutions would not have been mine. Unsophisticated racketeers differ from each other only in the degree to which they depressurize the frail vessel of human hopes, but what makes matters completely intolerable is knowing that were he alive today,

If MeDeFe continues to provide the pretext for police-state measures, I will be obliged to do something about him. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations. Even his shock troops are afraid that he will address what is, in the end, a nonexistent problem sometime soon. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again, and it is further evidence that no matter how much MeDeFe sentiments are rationalized, they still pit race against race, religion against religion, and country against country. But the problems with MeDeFes ebullitions don't end there. I have two words for MeDeFe: Grow up! Just don't expect consistency from a man who is utterly and surely disagreeable. The hostility and boredom he is experiencing internally is quite evident externally. That, in itself, will condemn us to live with the most unprincipled paper-pushers you'll ever see in a matter of days. Looking at it another way, if it weren't for rebarbative grizzlers, he would have no friends.

Before I continue, let me state that some reputed -- as opposed to reputable -- members of MeDeFe claque quite adamantly contend that women are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape. I find it rather astonishing that anyone could believe such a thing, but then again, MeDeFe is basically a bad person. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that MeDeFe has long served as a cheerleader for expansionism. But that's not all: If he can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that nihilism is a noble goal, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Pathetic Rhetoric. In the meantime, MeDeFe coalition appears to be growing in number. I pray that this is analogous to the flare-up of a candle just before extinction yet I keep reminding myself that idle hands are the devil's tools. That's why MeDeFe spends his leisure time devising ever more recalcitrant ways to substitute breast-beating and schwarmerei for action and honest debate. MeDeFe hates people who have huge supplies of the things he lacks. What he lacks the most is common sense, which underlies my point that I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I think that there is, because MeDeFe maintains that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. Perhaps it would be best for him to awaken from his delusional narcoleptic fantasy and and observe that what we're involved in with him is not a game. It's the most serious possible business, and every serious person -- every person with any shred of a sense of responsibility -- must concern himself with it. MeDeFe may be sincere, but he is also sincerely unprofessional. I can say one thing about him. He understands better than any of us that psychological impact is paramount -- not facts, not anybody's principles, not right and wrong. I'm not suggesting that we behave likewise. I'm suggesting only that I cannot promise not to be angry at MeDeFe. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me -- as it leads MeDeFe -- to clear-cut ancient forest lands.

Of perhaps even more concern is that the real question here is not, "How can we break MeDeFe hypnotic spell over the most footling nebbishes I've ever seen?". The real question is rather, "Is MeDeFe just trying to topple society?" Whatever the answer, I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by MeDeFe soulless beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments), but he parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, his ideas will change instantly, like a weathercock. At first, MeDeFe just wanted to sow the seeds of discord. Then, he tried to produce a large number of thoroughly judgmental extravagancies, most warped indecencies, and, above all, the most temperamental blasphemies against everything that I hold most sacred and most dear. Who knows what he'll do next? My best guess, for what it may be worth, is based on two key observations. The first observation is that he behaves as if he's been lobotomized. The second, more telling, observation is that it's unfortunate that MeDeFe has no real education. It's impossible to debate important topics with someone who is so mentally handicapped.

All I can tell you is what matters to me: We could opt to sit back and let MeDeFe use psychological tools to trick us into doing whatever antihumanist corrupt-types require of us. Most people, however, would argue that the cost in people's lives and self-esteem is an extremely high price to pay for such inaction on our part. He has written volumes about how his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that as our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the types of people MeDeFe preys upon. His older sermons were brutal enough. His latest ones are clearly beyond the pale.

I can hardly believe how in this day and age, unscrupulous, malignant ranters are allowed to turn the trickle of obscurantism into a tidal wave. His helots probably don't realize that, because it's not mentioned in the funny papers or in the movies. Not only does this subversive approach enhance MeDeFe ability to bring ugliness and nastiness into our lives but it also provides irrefutable evidence that he likes exegeses that impact public policy for years to come. Could there be a conflict of interest there? If you were to ask me, I'd say that he and his bootlickers are, by nature, lewd maniacs. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but most people don't realize that MeDeFe has already revealed his plans to organize a whispering campaign against me. He revealed these plans in a manifesto bearing all of the hallmarks of having been written by a vainglorious ragamuffin. his is manifesto is entirely lacking in logic, relentlessly subjective, and totally anecdotal, but I mean, he ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person. We cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that it has been said that before I knew anything about MeDeFe I was once an onlooker at a few of his mass demonstrations, without possessing even the slightest insight into the mentality of his conferees or the nature of his memorandum. To the rest of you I suggest that he truly believes that courtesy and manners don't count for anything. I hope you realize that that's just a loquacious pipe dream from a heartless pipe, and that in the real world, MeDeFe has declared that he's staging a revolt against everyone who wants to free his mind from the constricting trammels of alcoholism and the counterfeit moral inhibitions that have replaced true morality. MeDeFe revolting all right; the very sight of him turns my stomach. All kidding aside, this excerpt came from the same place as MeDeFe's post.

[MeDeFe]

How did you know I was going to come here and post just after you?

[Norse]

I agree, except for the part about the helium filled tubes.

[muy_thaiguy]

You over did it.

[Kaplowitz]

Say ello to ma lil friend!:
GGGAAWWWDDZZEEEELLLLAAAAA!!!!!!

[Norse]

I'm sick of coming here, and listening to your socialist propaganda.

I'm staying in my fridge next time.

[Cheesemore]

don't go out on that limb too far, some1 may cut it off behind you