Let's see how people reacted at the first implication of cult
Safari: Suggested it. Was accused of being cult. It was argued that he would not suggest it if he were cult, but this is a WIFOM argument and ca get tricky.
safariguy5 wrote:vote Hank44Soccer until he decides that posting more than once per mafia day is acceptable. Seriously.
Also, just looking at the scene, I think there's a possible cult recruiter out there.TheSaxlad wrote:
Could be McGill, could be the FW peeps, but we should definitely be aware of this.
I wouldn't say much more here, but here's a case from commander on Day 3.
Victor Sullivan: Voted Safari for suggesting cult. This was on the first page,so could easily be a joke vote. I wouldn't write it off completely...
Victor Sullivan wrote:Good point, safariguy. vote safariguy5.
I don't think anyone would have gotten that unless they were looking for it. If nothing else you're probably one of them.
... especially considering that he kinda pushed it.
Victor Sullivan wrote:Lol, well, I'd like to reiterate the claim on safariguy. His first post jumps to the conclusion that there's a cult - right off the bat. Seriously, town would be a little more silly first
Then kinda backed off, but didn't really.
Victor Sullivan wrote:Psh, prodded... I don't need to be prodded...
Frankly, the cases on both safariguy and hank seem good. I'll unvote for now and think about who I believe is more scummy.
Metsfan: Kinda pushes safari. Didn't vote, but makes the reasonable point that recruiter was not specifically implied.
Metsfanmax wrote:Ok, but the text didn't say anything about there being a recruiter, it just implied the hint of some sort of third party. Yet you jumped to the conclusion of recruiter immediately.
Also attempted to make it seem as though this was a more popular opinion than it actually was.
Metsfanmax wrote:Vote shield
Most of us thought it was suspicious that safari jumped to cult recruiter so quickly, but there simply wasn't enough to go on to force a real bandwagon. If you would be willing to join in on such weak evidence, something is probably amiss.
Jeradoo: Brings the WIFOM element into the mix. Supports the probability of a recruiter.
jeraado wrote:Mets, my first thought was recruiting cult and saf is way more experienced than me. If there is a third party faction then either it would have to have a good few members probably at least 4, or recruit. My take on the scene flavour is that at the moment it isnt a great threat, but needs to be taken care of, which suggests it can grow. However I think the main point is that personally, I couldn't see saf raising it in that way, even as a clever ruse to seem innocent.
Jimfinn: Never directly stated his opinion, but suggested that the scene could imply that there was a recruiter.
jimfinn wrote:Cult inherently implies recruiter, Metsfan, and he was listing as one possibility, not the definitive answer. Perhaps he also has some PR whose Role PM specifies anti-cult or something. It's not that suspect in my book. Setup specualtion is only suspicious when it avoids real discussion.
As for the players who've played a lot on here, what's the going meta with regard to cop, doc, vig, etc? One of each per game, or are no cop games common? Things like that do actually help at least some, especially for those unfamiliar with this site's version of mafia but experienced elsewhere.
Squirrel: Replaced Day 2. Could only speak from a perspective where cult was confirmed.