everywhere116 wrote:jak111 wrote:
Please Everywhere, save a lot of people a lot of grief of trying to get it through your thick skull, and reread my entire post you JUST quoted... FOS for skimming the post you just quoted Everywhere, there's no way it's a noob error, you've been playing for seems for a while now.
But your original post didn't make much sense, mainly with the unfounded assumptions. For instance, your assumption that there is a 100% chance of you dying tonight if we don't lynch Hitler. We still have very little idea what roles are out there and what kind of redundant protections we have; to believe that your power is the only thing that can save you is very premature. This is all assuming that the scum is going to try to kill you tonight, which is, again, an assumption, although one that is likely to play out.
safariguy5 wrote:Well I'll put my list then.
gimli
sg7
Sparticus
All because they haven't posted much. I'm not really seeing the case on chap or doom, I don't believe there's much merit on any cases currently, and jak and jgordon have made claims that can be reexamined in future days.
So inactive hunting, basically?
Yeah.
Ragian wrote:I don't see any cases worth voting for. We just have a lot of people yelling "skimming" at each other and frankly it's annoying to read the child-like: "You're ugly!" "No, YOU'RE ugly!"
If I am to compile a list, not all of the players on the list would be players I would want to lynch, but prolly players I feel should be pressured for a claim (to be honest, I think we could afford another claim today).
jgordon - if nothing else shows, I have no problem lynching jg as he isn't town
chap - his fights with several people make me think that we could gather a lot from him claiming
dazza - his inactivity could be remedied if we pressured him for a claim
As stated, the bottom two are merely players that could be pressured into claiming (for the reasons stated). I don't see either of the three inherently scummy, but if we found nothing scummier than a 3rd party, jg seems a good a lynch as any.
+1. The cases currently out there I don't see as vote worthy with the evidence given right now. Now, if more evidence could be later brought in, then they definitely could develop into good cases, but there's just not enough information out there right now.
In regards to jak and the uncertainty regarding his doc claim, I think a moderation in position on both sides would be a good thing.
For the people who doubt jak: Whether or not you believe his doc claim, it is still something that should not be lynched without solid proof that he's lying. I don't believe anybody has brought any good evidence forward. There have been no counter claims. So for Day 1, I think this is the furthest we can push it unless someone has new information.
For jak: As I and others have said before, we don't know what other roles are out there and what night actions could happen. To cast the possible outcomes of Night 1 as either you live or you die depending on what happens to jgordon relies on assumptions that are very tenuous and rely on highly unlikely probabilities. For instance, I believe we have a few manipulative and investigative roles that could help you out. We may even have other protecting roles that could also help. We don't know if there are third party, or roleblockers that might negate the mafia kill. There are a lot of factors, and to say that there are only two true outcomes is simply inaccurate.
