Moderator: Community Team
wicked wrote:side note, the mod has been so generous as to tell me my role is indeed chaplain, not champlain.
wicked wrote:So Minister, how does that make me scum? I'm not following. did you get a note saying you were blocked? I went back and checked my PM and it said my action had no effect, it didn't say I was blocked, I never claimed I was blocked. I never assumed I was blocked, I assumed my action had no effect b/c Ank was town and therefore couldn't be converted to town.
That helps, you didn't mentioned that before.wicked wrote:Minister, are you talking about Night 1 or 2? I am referring to Night 1.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Minister Masket wrote:That helps, you didn't mentioned that before.wicked wrote:Minister, are you talking about Night 1 or 2? I am referring to Night 1.
Night 1: You and AD couldn't use night actions.
Night 2: Me and koesen couldn't use our night actions.
Two roleblockers, garunteed.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Minister Masket wrote:That helps, you didn't mentioned that before.wicked wrote:Minister, are you talking about Night 1 or 2? I am referring to Night 1.
Night 1: You and AD couldn't use night actions.
Night 2: Me and koesen couldn't use our night actions.
Two roleblockers, garunteed.
Sierra_Leon wrote:I need some more time to think about lynching wicked. The role she claimed sounds pretty important for the town. I would be impressed if she thought that up, unless ofcourse she's actually the scum-counterpart that converts neutral insanes to scummy insanes. It's a tough call.
wicked wrote:I think we should look at who was online when Kozy was killed.
Minister, curious, have you already claimed a role, or just said you were blocked?
Anarkistsdream wrote:How would it be that a plain townie like Koesen could get the role right the first time and not the second?
Are we assuming there is a player that can not ROLEBLOCK, but TRUTHBLOCK???
How would they target someone?
All I can say is that Koesen has been proven to be correct, so how is he wrong about Wicked?
Anarkistsdream wrote:Minister Masket wrote:That helps, you didn't mentioned that before.wicked wrote:Minister, are you talking about Night 1 or 2? I am referring to Night 1.
Night 1: You and AD couldn't use night actions.
Night 2: Me and koesen couldn't use our night actions.
Two roleblockers, garunteed.
I am referring to night two... Not one.
wicked wrote:Sierra_Leon wrote:I need some more time to think about lynching wicked. The role she claimed sounds pretty important for the town. I would be impressed if she thought that up, unless ofcourse she's actually the scum-counterpart that converts neutral insanes to scummy insanes. It's a tough call.
Then why would I have the town's win condition??
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
wicked wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:wicked wrote:Then why would I have the town's win condition??
You don't have MY win condition, and I'm on the towns side.
And by that I take it you're not actually town, although pro-town?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
wicked wrote:I am no mafia noob... I would NOT kill someone going after me!! Kozy had already come out with what he found out, what reason would I have to off him now???? None!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users