Moderator: Community Team
Yomiel wrote:Actually, we don't even have to do that. I can explain things here without quoting. Here is what happened:
Me and Neb get our walkie-talkies and are told we can talk to one another, but we can't reveal our roles or who we are. I clarify about hinting. The host says we CAN hint at our identities and roles, but it cannot be obvious, or else he'll blur it out. I believe it was Neb who came up with hinting in the thread. Crazy said that was fine, but you couldn't post something like "I HAVE A WALKIE-TALKIE!", because that would get you a modkill and blacklist. Does this or does this not tell you you cannot post that you have the item in the thread. Otherwise, why would posting that be a problem?
crazymilkshake5 wrote:If you plan is to say: I HAVE A WALKIE TALKIE!
that WILL earn you a Mod-kill and a blacklist.
Yomiel wrote:Did someone besides the host PM me about this? Says one of my messages was deleted due to my preferences, but no idea what that means.@_@
Yomiel wrote:The host has given me permission to quote anything but my role PM, so here is the post in question. Crazy's response to me and Neb talking about hinting in the thread:crazymilkshake5 wrote:If you plan is to say: I HAVE A WALKIE TALKIE!
that WILL earn you a Mod-kill and a blacklist.
Yomiel wrote:The host has given me permission to quote anything but my role PM, so here is the post in question. Crazy's response to me and Neb talking about hinting in the thread:crazymilkshake5 wrote:If you plan is to say: I HAVE A WALKIE TALKIE!
that WILL earn you a Mod-kill and a blacklist.
thehippo8 wrote:For days now I've been wondering at your logic, trying to figure what it is that is out there in the open but not picked up. The penny has finally dropped.
You say others would be mod killed by saying they had the WT. They have not been mod-killed.
But then again, you have also said that you have had the WT. You have not been mod killed.
Now, assuming you are telling the truth that you were not allowed to mention the WT on day one then whoever had the other WT was probably told the same thing.
But day one is over.
It's now day three.
Obviously the restriction was just for day one, to give the WT a surprise additional value for that day.
And that day only.
The mod has said there is no inconsistency.
Yomiel, please go back and re-read your initial restrictions on the WT. Indeed, I challenge you to place the EXACT wording here. I am sure you will find no inconsistency in the mod's decision.
After all, you have now condfirmed you had the WT and you are not mod-killed!
Yomiel wrote:I'm not sure what you're trying to say. The point of the quote was to show that the host DID say that saying you have the walkie-talkie in the thread would result in a modkill and blacklist.
Yomiel wrote:It does, though. The host made it clear that an important part of the item was not knowing who you were talking to. That was why we couldn't obviously hint and why we couldn't choose who got the walkie-talkie that was given up. The host said saying we have it in the thread would get us modkilled/blacklisted. Trying to say it was just a Day 1 thing is a cheap out and only serves to make me look bad and is clearly not the case. If the mod meant something else, he can clarify, but that doesn't change what it looks like to someone reading it.
If you think the moderator has made a mistake just let them know in pm. They will either attempt to correct the mistake (if it really was a mistake) or not (if it wasn't). You can't argue with them about whether or not it was a mistake. As the mod they decide if it was a mistake or otherwise.crazymilkshake5 wrote:1. The moderator is always right. Do not try and argue with them. However we are all human and we all make mistakes. The moderator will try and fix any mistake he or she may have made.
Yomiel wrote:As I said, I DID. He responded very badly both times. He won't even consider that he made a mistake, and this behavior is hurting the game. I know what my PMs say, and you've all seen it yourself, yet he denies it.
Yomiel wrote:As I said, I DID. He responded very badly both times. He won't even consider that he made a mistake, and this behavior is hurting the game. I know what my PMs say, and you've all seen it yourself, yet he denies it.
Yomiel wrote:As I said, I DID. He responded very badly both times. He won't even consider that he made a mistake, and this behavior is hurting the game.
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Yomiel wrote:As I said, I DID. He responded very badly both times. He won't even consider that he made a mistake, and this behavior is hurting the game.
How ironic this statement is based off of who is stating it. If you need to replace him out crazy I'll take the spot.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users