Wow - talk about tunneling! I'll see how much of this I can get to:
--------------------------------------------
strike wolf wrote:I suppose there could be something to him knowing that death eaters=mafia but not reading that part in the opening scene but that seems a fairly thin wire to hang a case on even for day 1.
This post:
strike wolf wrote:vote degaston he wants everything 100% pure. He must be a death eater.
is when I made the connection that Death Eater = Mafia. I knew your post was meant as a joke, but I thought that using the term Death Eater was a tell. I can't believe how much time has been spent on this one stupid mistake.
--------------------------------------------
strike wolf wrote:degaston wrote:StorrZerg wrote:"fake claims"
It appears that you're claiming Filch. Has anyone else made a claim, fake or otherwise?
A bit of role fishing.
mafiascum.net wrote:Role Fishing is when a player asks leading questions, which can only be answered by a player with role-specific knowledge. In this way, by answering the question intelligibly, a player reveals they have role-specific knowledge, and is thus probably a power role, even though they didn't roleclaim.
My question was meant to be rhetorical, because I didn't think that anyone else had claimed, so how could Storr be accusing anyone of "fake claims" if there were no claims other than his?
And how is this role fishing, anyway? Is there some way to interpret Storr's post other than that he is claiming to have the ability to identify another player's role?
--------------------------------------------
strike wolf wrote:... I am just not sure I like the topic search answer...why did you use topic search specifically?
I used topic search because I was too lazy to go re-read everything that I had recently read, (though apparently not well enough) and even if I did re-read it, it would be possible to miss a reference to death eaters, so I thought that using topic search would be a better way to make sure that I hadn't somehow missed it. Turns out I was wrong. I see that MudPuppy also likes to use topic search. How do you try to find a term that might appear somewhere within all the posts in a thread? I would prefer to use Chrome page search, but I can't get the entire thread on one page. I still can't believe how much time has been spent on this one stupid mistake.
--------------------------------------------
strike wolf wrote:The vote itself is a bit OMGusy but coming from a new player, I don't mind the defense as a whole.
mafiascum.net wrote:OMGUS stands for "Oh My God, You Suck (for voting for me)!". it is sometimes used as a shorthand to indicate that you are voting for someone primarily because they voted for you.
So how can it be an OMGUS vote if Tonka never actually voted for me? I think someone else said I OMGUS'ed a few times (I'm not going to look it up because the search feature sucks here), but I believe you're the only one that I OMGUS'ed, and in that case it wasn't about you voting for me, but because I thought I'd caught a mistake in something you'd said. I
really can't believe how much time has been spent on this one stupid mistake
--------------------------------------------
strike wolf wrote:blah blah death eaters blah blah
I think this is why I have a hard time looking past you. These moments where you at the very least act like you know what something is and then ask what it means later. The rest of the post I could go either way, it isn't a bad defense.
There is no "mafiascum.net" entry on skimming. Does it just mean quickly reading over a post without absorbing and memorizing all of the facts and terms that you may need to know later, in case you want to accuse someone of knowing something that you think they could only know if they were scum, but it turns out that it was plainly posted right above your post where anyone could easily call you out on it, or does it have some deeper, more nuanced meaning, that only someone with more than 1 nooby mafia game under their belt would understand?
I really can't f*cking believe how much time has been wasted on this one stupid mistake.
--------------------------------------------
strike wolf wrote:My problem I have with this is a few things.
1. Why did Dega feel like he should answer this question directed at Sempai? This could have an easy answer but I would still like to hear it.
So first, all of this happened:
Ragian wrote:It says in the first post that death eaters have taken students' bodies and infiltrated the school. What I gather from Stor's mumblings is that he has spotted such a one. Why is everyone dismissing that? What if he's a day cop or something with a weird PR?
got tonkaed wrote:... id almost be happier to vote mtam under the pretense that if we somehow lucked into storr as a day cop, that we make use of it.
degaston wrote:Anyway, I was not aware that there could be a day cop. That sounds reasonable.
Unvote
Vote mtamburini
sempaispellcheck wrote:degaston wrote:Anyway, I was not aware that there could be a day cop. That sounds reasonable.
Unvote
Vote mtamburini
And if there were a day cop, Filch is a pretty likely candidate.
StorrZerg wrote:degaston wrote:Anyway, I was not aware that there could be a day cop. That sounds reasonable.
Unvote
Vote mtamburini
I'm just a Squib. ...
Then:
strike wolf wrote:@Sempai: How would Filch make a good day cop?
So you're saying that the @Sempai means that no one else is allowed to give their own opinion? As far as I can tell, Ragain was the first to suggest the idea. Tonka seemed to think that it was possible. I used that to justify my vote. Sempai was responding to my vote when he said that Filch would be a likely candidate. But when I responded to your question, you act like I just barged into a private conversation between the two of you?
--------------------------------------------
strike wolf wrote:2. The explanation given makes less sense than the non-explanation that Sempai had given. Dega essentially said that it was because he didn't have magical powers that it seemed to fit.
I thought that it would be logical for the mod to make the Filch character a cop because he acts like a cop - looking out for "lawbreakers". I think others have agreed with this assessment. I can't understand why you think this is illogical. I'm not saying that I have any proof that he is a cop, or that the mod had to match each character perfectly to his or her role - just that I think it would fit the character from the books/movies. Do you think the cop role, if there was one, would not be a fit for Filch, and if not, why? (kind of an academic discussion now since Storr claimed 3rd party survivor.)
--------------------------------------------
strike wolf wrote:degaston wrote:sempaispellcheck wrote:strike wolf wrote:@Sempai: How would Filch make a good day cop?
He's the caretaker - he essentially polices the castle and is responsible for punishing misbehaving students.
Strikewolf, how is this different from what I said?
What bugged me about this is that it came across to me as Post Hoc Ergo Hoc. He essentially brings my argument into question by linking to the explanation he had given in response to my argument after I had given my argument.
I guess I must have missed it. What argument did you make?
--------------------------------------------
strike wolf wrote:I did vote on you because you backtracked
Are you saying that after this:
degaston wrote:...Anyway, I was not aware that there could be a day cop. That sounds reasonable.Vote mtamburini
degaston wrote:strike wolf wrote:@Sempai: How would Filch make a good day cop?
I'd say that it would fit the character well, and he doesn't have any magical powers, so... why not?
Now he says he's just a squib, so I don't know if he's denying that role, or...?
strike wolf wrote:Okay degaston, considering your logic makes less sense than Senpai just throwing it out there. How does Filch make a likely day cop?
I should have just doubled down and forged ahead with confident assertions that Filch was definitely a day cop so that you couldn't accuse me of backtracking? What would you have accused me of in that case?
And if backtracking is such a scummy action, then why have you never said anything about Storr's "Death Eaters pretending to be students I see." followed by "I'm just a Squib. ..."
--------------------------------------------
strike wolf wrote:This struck me as a bandwagon vote.
Really? Of all the people who were voting for Sempai before and after me, I'm the one who's bandwagoning?
--------------------------------------------
strike wolf wrote:I don't know. I could see an argument either way but I just don't like that he seems to be following what he learned about scummy posting in another game over his own reasoning. On one hand, I understand that he is new and that's not that unlikely to happen on the other hand it makes it easy to fall behind something without explaining it and he did this a bit with the "vote tam because storr seems to be a day cop and it makes sense type of thing as well because REASONS!" issue as well.
In my first game, my reasoning told me that we shouldn't lynch someone on the first day because we were more likely to lynch a townie. I also thought that we should get as many claims as possible to know more about the setup. I was told that just about everything I reasoned was wrong, so I've been trying to play the way the experienced player told us to play, rather than the way I would play by my own reasoning.
--------------------------------------------
I sense a pattern of willful ignorance/obtuseness in your post. I think most of these could have been answered just by a careful reading of the posts if you were that interested. Is it possible that I hit a nerve by accident?