Sigh, I guess I need to reread too, as I also wonder if there's something to find in relation to Fir since his kill is more likely to be mafia's. I guess I'll adress the "case" on me first, even though it doesn't make much sense to me...
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I have never seen you misinterpret anything before. You seem to have a competent grasp on the English language. Are you trying to blame language on this? You compared the two posts of karel, clearly in an attempt to contrast what he initially stated (that his role was "bad":
karel wrote:and that whether or not they are maffia kind of depends on what they do compared to the average citizen.
with the other post that explained his role as "good." Regardless of your understanding of the nuances of "protagonist", you used his posts to paint him scummy.
Ok, do you know the meaning of "protagonist"? Because if you don't it'd at least explain why you're reusing this argument. I thought I was quite clear, even though I pwn english more than most natives I'll give you that
In french, the common use of protagonist is to mean "the hero/good guy", while it actually means simply "the main character". Obviously in Tarantino movies many protagonists are actually bad guys. When I realized that I had some intellectual honesty to admit to my mistake, since this means Karel just said that he wasn't a main character and that he was a good guy. So wtf exactly?
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:ga7 wrote:I'm more suspicious of Victor at this point, gonna have to reread on him/AoG,
Why? You must have a low opinion of me if you think I can be distracted with these musings. Here you attempt to divert my attention by calling out Vic/AoG, of a character I myself previously stated I found suspicious, but you do so with little evidence. I know you ususally bring much better evidence than that. Perhaps you hope that I'll jump right back to Vic/AoG? Tsk tsk, you're a crafty one, ga7.
Ok here I'll just leave you to your egocentric fantasies I think. It's not you, it's me
So sorry to actually try to find scum while you ass around, the fact I haven't put a case is because that involves another focus reread since my suspicion is based on general behaviour.
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:? IMO if Orange and White are supposed to be shacked up together, and Orange showed up guilty, then presumably it's to retain his cover with the diamond thieves. I think White would show up anti-town. Unless I misunderstood something there, please enlighten me.
nagerous wrote:If Mr. Orange came out as a miller (he was a 'good guy' in respect to the film) a miller as in would come out as scum when he is actually town this makes me a hella lot more suspicious of naxus and Mr. White's role.. it seems that people are trying to distance themselves from this argument, which makes me think that mafia are subtly trying to make us pressurise other players so that we avoid targetting their more exposed members (no jokes about exposed members please).
Well, I see the logic behind seeing it in that angle but to me the fact Orange was undercover cop means under investigation his cover would be blown hence the guilty result. Either theory could be right I think, and since we saw the lovers couple not making too much sense I won't put my money on background stuff. I do have other reasons to believe the robbers are town though and as Strike pointed out Mandy's move could only fit an usurper or weird GF as far as mafia is concerned, which doesn't quite fit since Fir was Orange, not Pmc.
