Moderator: Community Team
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Minister Masket wrote:AND ALSO for having a mystery Open Slot for Player 16 on page 1. Such shambolic modding would never happen in one of my games.
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Minister Masket wrote:Vote nagerous and ga7 for starting Day 1 before I could confirm. Where's the patience?
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
dakky21 wrote:Minister Masket wrote:Vote nagerous and ga7 for starting Day 1 before I could confirm. Where's the patience?
Unless you are a double voter, you know it's impossible to have two votes. It's the same as voting a mod or a NPC or no lynch. I don't want to break joke stage but it's already FOS on you.
HotShot53 wrote:vote dakky for not realizing nag and g7 are the mods
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:fir2m
Vote: Mandy
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
mandalorian2298 wrote:Fircoal wrote:fir2m
Vote: Mandy
Revenge vote without bothering to come up with an rationalization?
Someone sure is relaxed.
Someone doesn't seem weary or suspicious.
Maybe someone doesn't need to scumhunt?
Hmmmmm
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:Fircoal wrote:fir2m
Vote: Mandy
Revenge vote without bothering to come up with an rationalization?
Someone sure is relaxed.
Someone doesn't seem weary or suspicious.
Maybe someone doesn't need to scumhunt?
Hmmmmm
Why would I need to scumhunt when I already have the answers. I KNOW you're scum thusly I know I have to lynch you.
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
mandalorian2298 wrote:Fircoal wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:Fircoal wrote:fir2m
Vote: Mandy
Revenge vote without bothering to come up with an rationalization?
Someone sure is relaxed.
Someone doesn't seem weary or suspicious.
Maybe someone doesn't need to scumhunt?
Hmmmmm
Why would I need to scumhunt when I already have the answers. I KNOW you're scum thusly I know I have to lynch you.
OK Fircoal, let me explain to you how a Mafia game works:
On one side, you have a few players, who are called: Mafia. These players know who all the Mafia players are and, by process of elimination, they can conclude that all the other players (for example nagerous or Ga7) are Town or some third party.
On the second side you have the majority the players who are called Townies. Each individual Townie, only knows he himself is a Townie and nothing else. For all they know, any other player could be a part of Mafia, from always honest nagerous to perpetually plotting Ga7.
On the third side you have the players who belong to Third Party. They party a lot and are generally agreeable sort of people who don't mind lending you their umbrella or helping you trim those nose hairs that you can't get a good angle on.
Of these three groups, only the first group, the Mafia, don't need to scumhunt (unless it's raining or their nose has started to look like Den Of Black Spaghetti).
Thus, when you say that you don't need to scumhunt, you are de facto claiming that the Town should vote to hang you by your perfectly groomed nostrils.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:Fircoal wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:Fircoal wrote:fir2m
Vote: Mandy
Revenge vote without bothering to come up with an rationalization?
Someone sure is relaxed.
Someone doesn't seem weary or suspicious.
Maybe someone doesn't need to scumhunt?
Hmmmmm
Why would I need to scumhunt when I already have the answers. I KNOW you're scum thusly I know I have to lynch you.
OK Fircoal, let me explain to you how a Mafia game works:
On one side, you have a few players, who are called: Mafia. These players know who all the Mafia players are and, by process of elimination, they can conclude that all the other players (for example nagerous or Ga7) are Town or some third party.
On the second side you have the majority the players who are called Townies. Each individual Townie, only knows he himself is a Townie and nothing else. For all they know, any other player could be a part of Mafia, from always honest nagerous to perpetually plotting Ga7.
On the third side you have the players who belong to Third Party. They party a lot and are generally agreeable sort of people who don't mind lending you their umbrella or helping you trim those nose hairs that you can't get a good angle on.
Of these three groups, only the first group, the Mafia, don't need to scumhunt (unless it's raining or their nose has started to look like Den Of Black Spaghetti).
Thus, when you say that you don't need to scumhunt, you are de facto claiming that the Town should vote to hang you by your perfectly groomed nostrils.
Yes in most cases this is correct but I don't think you realize. It's just as if a cop was told someone was mafia they know this for a fact. While it is always wise to look into other cases they know who their #1 target for the lynch should be. I am in this same position. I know that you're scum thusly I don't need to try to find other scum right now. I'll be wise and listen but it's only day 1 and there has yet to be anything that even sniffs at a compelling case. Meanwhile it's clearly obvious by all measures that you are scum. There is no other rational play that I could make except for to vote you!
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
mandalorian2298 wrote:Fircoal wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:Fircoal wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:Fircoal wrote:fir2m
Vote: Mandy
Revenge vote without bothering to come up with an rationalization?
Someone sure is relaxed.
Someone doesn't seem weary or suspicious.
Maybe someone doesn't need to scumhunt?
Hmmmmm
Why would I need to scumhunt when I already have the answers. I KNOW you're scum thusly I know I have to lynch you.
OK Fircoal, let me explain to you how a Mafia game works:
On one side, you have a few players, who are called: Mafia. These players know who all the Mafia players are and, by process of elimination, they can conclude that all the other players (for example nagerous or Ga7) are Town or some third party.
On the second side you have the majority the players who are called Townies. Each individual Townie, only knows he himself is a Townie and nothing else. For all they know, any other player could be a part of Mafia, from always honest nagerous to perpetually plotting Ga7.
On the third side you have the players who belong to Third Party. They party a lot and are generally agreeable sort of people who don't mind lending you their umbrella or helping you trim those nose hairs that you can't get a good angle on.
Of these three groups, only the first group, the Mafia, don't need to scumhunt (unless it's raining or their nose has started to look like Den Of Black Spaghetti).
Thus, when you say that you don't need to scumhunt, you are de facto claiming that the Town should vote to hang you by your perfectly groomed nostrils.
Yes in most cases this is correct but I don't think you realize. It's just as if a cop was told someone was mafia they know this for a fact. While it is always wise to look into other cases they know who their #1 target for the lynch should be. I am in this same position. I know that you're scum thusly I don't need to try to find other scum right now. I'll be wise and listen but it's only day 1 and there has yet to be anything that even sniffs at a compelling case. Meanwhile it's clearly obvious by all measures that you are scum. There is no other rational play that I could make except for to vote you!
Behold, brothers and sisters: the vainness of the Chu!Are you going to allow him to taunt us so and to lord his perfectly pampered nostrils over us, as if compered to him we are no more then so many aardvarks!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Ragian wrote:Unvote vote mandy and chu for quoting each other unnecessarily in order to make their joke points.
What will coffee-infused dakky make of that, I wonder...?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users