m=0
Moderator: Community Team

 betiko
				betiko
			





























 2
2


 2
2
 
		strike wolf wrote: I guess my main point in this post is what I mentioned earlier. WHat changed in the half a day or so that made you change your mind about the BG case? Because I don't see anything.
Swifte wrote:I will go ahead and throw my two cents out there on everything since activity has slowed again a little. While I didn't initially find there to be much in strike's case against BG, the last 36 hours have been pretty revealing.
 ). That's what I was referring to, and I think there was quite a lot that I hadn't commented on and I finally had some time to. When I woke up that morning, saw the thread had been dead for about 14 hrs other than trini or someone fastposting me, I put my own couple of thoughts out there. I hadn't in fact 'changed my mind'... as you mentioned I really hadn't stated many opinions to that point, but after taking it all in I made up my mind that I didn't really buy BG's claim, thought some of his behavior seemed like giving up, that the sacrificial lamb card was too easy to play from the position he was in and that he seemed to be overplaying it, and that, not having any previous experience playing with BG and not having hours to spend pouring over old games, I hadn't seen much to that point that made me think that he was going to be a strong contributor any further even if it was an accidental townie lynch.  Those were my impressions.
). That's what I was referring to, and I think there was quite a lot that I hadn't commented on and I finally had some time to. When I woke up that morning, saw the thread had been dead for about 14 hrs other than trini or someone fastposting me, I put my own couple of thoughts out there. I hadn't in fact 'changed my mind'... as you mentioned I really hadn't stated many opinions to that point, but after taking it all in I made up my mind that I didn't really buy BG's claim, thought some of his behavior seemed like giving up, that the sacrificial lamb card was too easy to play from the position he was in and that he seemed to be overplaying it, and that, not having any previous experience playing with BG and not having hours to spend pouring over old games, I hadn't seen much to that point that made me think that he was going to be a strong contributor any further even if it was an accidental townie lynch.  Those were my impressions.
 Swifte
				Swifte
			



























 3
3



 
		
 betiko
				betiko
			





























 2
2


 2
2
 
		
 MoB Deadly
				MoB Deadly
			



























 
		
 MoB Deadly
				MoB Deadly
			



























 
		
 jonty125
				jonty125
			





 
		
 BGtheBrain
				BGtheBrain
			



















 
		
 jonty125
				jonty125
			





 
		betiko wrote:I am definitely going to vote for either of you:
-BG is indeed a VT and you are scum pushing for his elimination: in this case your arguments are perfect. sacrifice a VT, who cares? it s for the own good of the town! if he is lynched, no one can blame you because you said that he is 49% of a possible VT. we will just learn more. And you would have 1 lesser townie to take care of before the night kill.

 Swifte
				Swifte
			



























 3
3



 
		Swifte wrote:betiko wrote:I am definitely going to vote for either of you:
-BG is indeed a VT and you are scum pushing for his elimination: in this case your arguments are perfect. sacrifice a VT, who cares? it s for the own good of the town! if he is lynched, no one can blame you because you said that he is 49% of a possible VT. we will just learn more. And you would have 1 lesser townie to take care of before the night kill.
It was not a scum vote, it was the only remotely credible case we had established in all of Day 1 at the time and others were voting for BG for just that reason, and I'm really shocked at this point that it's been almost completely dropped just because I bought in to what everyone else was saying and what my gut was telling me at the time and made my vote.


 drunkmonkey
				drunkmonkey
			


















 
		Swifte wrote:
As to the accusations of submarining against myself - the truth is this is my first forum based mafia game anywhere ever. I signed up cause I'm a CC medal whore (self-professed!) and I am familiar with the game from playing in real life so I thought I'd give it a shot. Yes, it took me a while to acclimate to the expections, I wasn't even sure how to make a case based on some transcripts and quotes, (I'm used to playing where Night is first so you at least know who the mob killed the first day to start the discussion), and so I took the time to watch and learn from more experienced players like strike and Roidon in where they were making their deductions from betiko and BG's replies, meanwhile contributing in the little ways I thought I could to show that yes, I'm commited to the game, and trying to support the town cause however I could, just still learning what to do. (True story - I had to ask safariguy what it meant to 'confirm in the thread') And when I finally thought I kind of had it figured out and stuck my toe out to state my assessment of events to date and that I finally felt comfortable voting, it's gotten slammed back in my face. You all are misinterpreting my noobiness as scuminess. I'd like to give more people some time to read my last two posts before claiming since we still have a little time left and I'm not quite imminent, but if there's a call for me to claim I will.

 MoB Deadly
				MoB Deadly
			



























 
		Swifte wrote:betiko wrote:I am definitely going to vote for either of you:
-BG is indeed a VT and you are scum pushing for his elimination: in this case your arguments are perfect. sacrifice a VT, who cares? it s for the own good of the town! if he is lynched, no one can blame you because you said that he is 49% of a possible VT. we will just learn more. And you would have 1 lesser townie to take care of before the night kill.
It was not a scum vote, it was the only remotely credible case we had established in all of Day 1 at the time and others were voting for BG for just that reason, and I'm really shocked at this point that it's been almost completely dropped just because I bought in to what everyone else was saying and what my gut was telling me at the time and made my vote.
As to the accusations of submarining against myself - the truth is this is my first forum based mafia game anywhere ever. I signed up cause I'm a CC medal whore (self-professed!) and I am familiar with the game from playing in real life so I thought I'd give it a shot. Yes, it took me a while to acclimate to the expections, I wasn't even sure how to make a case based on some transcripts and quotes, (I'm used to playing where Night is first so you at least know who the mob killed the first day to start the discussion), and so I took the time to watch and learn from more experienced players like strike and Roidon in where they were making their deductions from betiko and BG's replies, meanwhile contributing in the little ways I thought I could to show that yes, I'm commited to the game, and trying to support the town cause however I could, just still learning what to do. (True story - I had to ask safariguy what it meant to 'confirm in the thread') And when I finally thought I kind of had it figured out and stuck my toe out to state my assessment of events to date and that I finally felt comfortable voting, it's gotten slammed back in my face. You all are misinterpreting my noobiness as scuminess. I'd like to give more people some time to read my last two posts before claiming since we still have a little time left and I'm not quite imminent, but if there's a call for me to claim I will.
drunkmonkey wrote:Swifte wrote:betiko wrote:I am definitely going to vote for either of you:
-BG is indeed a VT and you are scum pushing for his elimination: in this case your arguments are perfect. sacrifice a VT, who cares? it s for the own good of the town! if he is lynched, no one can blame you because you said that he is 49% of a possible VT. we will just learn more. And you would have 1 lesser townie to take care of before the night kill.
It was not a scum vote, it was the only remotely credible case we had established in all of Day 1 at the time and others were voting for BG for just that reason, and I'm really shocked at this point that it's been almost completely dropped just because I bought in to what everyone else was saying and what my gut was telling me at the time and made my vote.
Betiko's post listed 3 options:
1)BG is scum and you are town
2)BG is town and you are scum
3)You're both town
His post covered every scenario. Why did you get so animated that he brought up option 2?

 trinicardinal
				trinicardinal
			




















 
		drunkmonkey wrote:Swifte wrote:betiko wrote:I am definitely going to vote for either of you:
-BG is indeed a VT and you are scum pushing for his elimination: in this case your arguments are perfect. sacrifice a VT, who cares? it s for the own good of the town! if he is lynched, no one can blame you because you said that he is 49% of a possible VT. we will just learn more. And you would have 1 lesser townie to take care of before the night kill.
It was not a scum vote, it was the only remotely credible case we had established in all of Day 1 at the time and others were voting for BG for just that reason, and I'm really shocked at this point that it's been almost completely dropped just because I bought in to what everyone else was saying and what my gut was telling me at the time and made my vote.
Betiko's post listed 3 options:
1)BG is scum and you are town
2)BG is town and you are scum
3)You're both town
His post covered every scenario. Why did you get so animated that he brought up option 2?

 Swifte
				Swifte
			



























 3
3



 
		Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.

 strike wolf
				strike wolf
			







 
		
 BGtheBrain
				BGtheBrain
			



















 
		trinicardinal wrote:Swifte wrote:betiko wrote:I am definitely going to vote for either of you:
-BG is indeed a VT and you are scum pushing for his elimination: in this case your arguments are perfect. sacrifice a VT, who cares? it s for the own good of the town! if he is lynched, no one can blame you because you said that he is 49% of a possible VT. we will just learn more. And you would have 1 lesser townie to take care of before the night kill.
It was not a scum vote, it was the only remotely credible case we had established in all of Day 1 at the time and others were voting for BG for just that reason, and I'm really shocked at this point that it's been almost completely dropped just because I bought in to what everyone else was saying and what my gut was telling me at the time and made my vote.
As to the accusations of submarining against myself - the truth is this is my first forum based mafia game anywhere ever. I signed up cause I'm a CC medal whore (self-professed!) and I am familiar with the game from playing in real life so I thought I'd give it a shot. Yes, it took me a while to acclimate to the expections, I wasn't even sure how to make a case based on some transcripts and quotes, (I'm used to playing where Night is first so you at least know who the mob killed the first day to start the discussion), and so I took the time to watch and learn from more experienced players like strike and Roidon in where they were making their deductions from betiko and BG's replies, meanwhile contributing in the little ways I thought I could to show that yes, I'm commited to the game, and trying to support the town cause however I could, just still learning what to do. (True story - I had to ask safariguy what it meant to 'confirm in the thread') And when I finally thought I kind of had it figured out and stuck my toe out to state my assessment of events to date and that I finally felt comfortable voting, it's gotten slammed back in my face. You all are misinterpreting my noobiness as scuminess. I'd like to give more people some time to read my last two posts before claiming since we still have a little time left and I'm not quite imminent, but if there's a call for me to claim I will.
If you are at L-2 as was previously mentioned it might be a good idea to claim. deadline is Sunday and some people will be less active tomorrow and Sunday (myself for example). If it is important enough then it might be a good idea to give people enough reason to unvote now.drunkmonkey wrote:Swifte wrote:betiko wrote:I am definitely going to vote for either of you:
-BG is indeed a VT and you are scum pushing for his elimination: in this case your arguments are perfect. sacrifice a VT, who cares? it s for the own good of the town! if he is lynched, no one can blame you because you said that he is 49% of a possible VT. we will just learn more. And you would have 1 lesser townie to take care of before the night kill.
It was not a scum vote, it was the only remotely credible case we had established in all of Day 1 at the time and others were voting for BG for just that reason, and I'm really shocked at this point that it's been almost completely dropped just because I bought in to what everyone else was saying and what my gut was telling me at the time and made my vote.
Betiko's post listed 3 options:
1)BG is scum and you are town
2)BG is town and you are scum
3)You're both town
His post covered every scenario. Why did you get so animated that he brought up option 2?
I'm curious... anyone thought about this final possibility?
4) they're both scum and this is a plan to establish one of them solidly as town? for the experienced players... does any of this make sense. I suspect that either Option 1 or Option 2 is the more likely option but I was wondering.
Also chapcrap has been posting a lot more recently so my reservations about him submarining have diminished, therefore [color=#0040BF]Unvote[/color]

 jonty125
				jonty125
			





 
		

 drunkmonkey
				drunkmonkey
			


















 
		
 Swifte
				Swifte
			



























 3
3



 
		Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.

 strike wolf
				strike wolf
			







 
		Swifte wrote:Fine, I really did not want to but there are too many calls for me to claim before the weekend.
I am Dr. Finklestein, Town Doctor.
NOT evil doctor mind you.. just regular old townie doctor. I'm sorry that I've botched this all up and somehow managed to fling myself in to the limelight on Day 1. I definitely have a lot to learn about how to play this game in the forums.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.

 strike wolf
				strike wolf
			







 
		
 BGtheBrain
				BGtheBrain
			



















 
		
 Rodion
				Rodion
			























 
		Rodion wrote:9 - How should I play my role?
e) town watcher - in this particular game, watch the doctor. This will either prevent scum from killing the doctor or at least give us insurance that we will lynch the doctor's killer the next day.

 jonty125
				jonty125
			





 
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users