Moderator: Community Team
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
nagerous wrote:wercool wrote:colton24 wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Announcement
Deadline has been reached. Since Nagerous inherited a tainted role, I am having him replace Squirrels Hat. I will send him a new pm. This is since he hasn't really posted anyways, so I'll count this as a modkill. Hopefully, we'll get some more active posting the next day. I'll also prod people who haven't posted in a while (Senfive for example)
Well that is major submarining. Ahem, vote nag
i see the lodgic in this vote nag
Weak 'lodgic.' Despite the fact that I have been voted by 2 numbskulls, I will provide an expansive post tomorrow, sorry about lack of attendance I know it is disappointing, but it isn't like I am the only criminal here...
gregwolf121 wrote:is anyone willing to sum up the progress weve made in the game because i don't see any
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
colton24 wrote:F1fth wrote:Sorry folks, been busy with teh schoolz. I'm glad to see that my absence has been noted, it shows you guys are thinking.
Yes, the Nag thing was a colossal mess but if you've seen any of my posts before where I hinted that the bandwagon was just for show, and then my subsequent posts where I explained that the bandwagon was just for show, you'd know well that it was, well... just for show. I'm disappointed that Nag was actually killed (did any of you guys know it was coming?) but again I realize it's no fault of the mod who had announced the kill beforehand.
With all that out of the way, we also have some interesting developments. I'm getting a townish vibe from gregwolf. I can see how someone could interpret his willingness to off a person is suspicious, given that if he were scum he could get a free blameless scum kill but to me he just seems like a townie trying to generate some activity. Nevertheless, it'll be a good idea to keep an eye on him.
I also believe coyboyz claim. I know there are several different variations of bodyguard (some protect and die, some just protect, some even kill the attacker). I'll just say that unless you find the information to be beneficial to the town that you keep the specifics to yourself.
Welcome Rainbow Eater... careful where you point your gun.![]()
As for potential leads, we have a few players flying under the radar, but know that we know SFX's alignment, we might be able to make a few connections (even though he said all of two things here). I'll report back if I have anything.
Well we are no-where. I thought nag replaced someone after being killed. Correct me if I'm wrong.
/ wrote:Sorry, I didn't remember I wasn't posting.
I still say our greatest tool are our guns, if possible we should kill as many suspects during the days as reasonably possible, (not suggesting anyone in particular) the less nights scum has the better, but the main point is if we follow this course of action we must follow through until we hit the cult leader or significant members of mafia. Still I will keep my gun holstered until we are in agreement, or someone could disagree, as long as everyone doesn't just pretend I didn't say a thing for the third time.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
safariguy5 wrote:Vote Count
gregwolf-3 (spurgistan, wercool, captainwalrus)
colton-1 (LSU Tiger Josh)
cowboyz-3 (duday, gregwolf)
nagerous-2 (colton, wercool)
/-1 (strike wolf)
With 16 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.
Reminder
Colton, you did not unvote before voting nagerous. I will let it slide this time. Please remember to unvote before voting.
safariguy5 wrote:Vote Count
gregwolf-3 (spurgistan, wercool, captainwalrus)
colton-1 (LSU Tiger Josh)
cowboyz-3 (duday, gregwolf)
nagerous-2 (colton, wercool)
/-1 (strike wolf)
With 16 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.
Reminder
Colton, you did not unvote before voting nagerous. I will let it slide this time. Please remember to unvote before voting.
safariguy5 wrote:Vote Count
gregwolf-3 (spurgistan, wercool, captainwalrus)
colton-1 (LSU Tiger Josh)
cowboyz-3 (duday, gregwolf)
nagerous-2 (colton, wercool)
/-1 (strike wolf)
With 16 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.
Reminder
Colton, you did not unvote before voting nagerous. I will let it slide this time. Please remember to unvote before voting.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
colton24 wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Vote Count
gregwolf-3 (spurgistan, wercool, captainwalrus)
colton-1 (LSU Tiger Josh)
cowboyz-3 (duday, gregwolf)
nagerous-2 (colton, wercool)
/-1 (strike wolf)
With 16 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.
Reminder
Colton, you did not unvote before voting nagerous. I will let it slide this time. Please remember to unvote before voting.
My bad. I won't throw him under the bus unvote.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
strike wolf wrote:/ wrote:Sorry, I didn't remember I wasn't posting.
I still say our greatest tool are our guns, if possible we should kill as many suspects during the days as reasonably possible, (not suggesting anyone in particular) the less nights scum has the better, but the main point is if we follow this course of action we must follow through until we hit the cult leader or significant members of mafia. Still I will keep my gun holstered until we are in agreement, or someone could disagree, as long as everyone doesn't just pretend I didn't say a thing for the third time.
vote: /
Firing at people who we simply suspect does about as much good as just about everyon picking names out of a jar to shoot and since we only have one bullet each the only people this would really help are the mafia and cult. Furthermore, this has been explained before in this thread (at least twice I believe). To try to say something like that makes me feel that you are in fact scum.
/ wrote:I basically support killing anyone without a good claim until we kill the cult leader today.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Fifth's idea seems to make good sense. But the votes are pretty spread right now.cowboyz wrote:Another thing. Who will be the ones to use their shots? I know greg volunteered earlier. Should we just ask for volunteers or what?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users