animorpherv1 wrote:it doesn't say anything on OP about contaiing info in the scenes, so MM, do you put info in scenes?
Occasionally. It's up to you to decide whether the information is relevant.

Moderator: Community Team
animorpherv1 wrote:it doesn't say anything on OP about contaiing info in the scenes, so MM, do you put info in scenes?
Stroop wrote:Minister Masket wrote:I didn't type 1500 words this morning to hand in an essay before 12'o'clock just to see this become inactive.
Let's pick up the pace please.
I think everyone is waiting for that pair of eyes to reveal themselves
pmchugh wrote:Drench wrote:String of four. Nice.
At this stage, I'm willing to Vote: Its Bolt. Incredibly scummy, contradictions (That MCC of yours won't reveal roles, but it will reveal the lyncher!), and that MCC just tip the barrel off the edge.Drench wrote:Back and reading.
However, I did read the last page quickly, and Flores is quickly digging a hole for herself. I mean:as usual my conquer chauvinist take the easy way out bandwagoning the only woman at play who make no excuses for point out your lack of vision ^^
What is that?You are being bandwagoned because people consider you to be scummy.
This. I didn't know you were female until you happened to say it. Migods, this is a Mafia game! You have been scummy, therefore people are voting you!Do not forget that I wield the difference between the life and death.
Am I missing something here? Or is this a funny? If it is, I dun gedit.Drench wrote:EBWOP: Vote: Flores.
Complete contradiction, their may have been ohers but you were the first I noticed. unvote vote drench
nagerous wrote:It's alluded to in the scene.
Drench wrote:pmchugh wrote:Since not much is going on atm, I resurect this point from yesterday:pmchugh wrote:Drench wrote:String of four. Nice.
At this stage, I'm willing to Vote: Its Bolt. Incredibly scummy, contradictions (That MCC of yours won't reveal roles, but it will reveal the lyncher!), and that MCC just tip the barrel off the edge.Drench wrote:Back and reading.
However, I did read the last page quickly, and Flores is quickly digging a hole for herself. I mean:as usual my conquer chauvinist take the easy way out bandwagoning the only woman at play who make no excuses for point out your lack of vision ^^
What is that?You are being bandwagoned because people consider you to be scummy.
This. I didn't know you were female until you happened to say it. Migods, this is a Mafia game! You have been scummy, therefore people are voting you!Do not forget that I wield the difference between the life and death.
Am I missing something here? Or is this a funny? If it is, I dun gedit.Drench wrote:EBWOP: Vote: Flores.
Complete contradiction, their may have been ohers but you were the first I noticed. unvote vote drench
You voted for bolt when you agreed with him earlier, doesn't make sense to me unless you were just bandwaggoning. unvote vote drench
Emphasis mine.
You say there have been others. Why are you not following up on them? Tunneling much?
Drench wrote:Back and reading.
However, I did read the last page quickly, and Flores is quickly digging a hole for herself. I mean:as usual my conquer chauvinist take the easy way out bandwagoning the only woman at play who make no excuses for point out your lack of vision ^^
What is that?You are being bandwagoned because people consider you to be scummy.
This. I didn't know you were female until you happened to say it. Migods, this is a Mafia game! You have been scummy, therefore people are voting you!Do not forget that I wield the difference between the life and death.
Am I missing something here? Or is this a funny? If it is, I dun gedit.
Go ahead. He does not appear to be being going to be useful.Iliad wrote:This game is dying. Therefore I propose a solution. I'm sure a daykill could liven this day up again.
Drench I'm looking at you. Simply because people have already accused you and so a discussion can be made. Come and defend yourself or I will manually insert life into this game again.
Drench wrote:Okay then. I am Krug's alter-ego, Dr. Van Kruglor. I used to be unpleasant, but now that there are bad guys, my unpleasant lifestyle is threatened! I must act, using my apparent credentials to create wonders! Of course, I'm still unpleasant. Can't go cold turkey.
So basically, I'm an Semi-Selfish Inventor (my words). I can create a protective thingy (no name), an investigating thingy and a killing thingy. The night after, I can give it to someone or use it. I believe then the person is informed the night after if I give it away, but I may be wrong there. Each thingy can only be created twice. In addition, I may only give 2 thingys away to others.
N1 I went away for a week and neglected to send an action before I left (Stupid me, I know, I had two days, blah blah blah, don't hate me please), and N2 I created an investigation thingy. I intend to use it myself to get a quicker result tonight.
Does that satisfy you?
spiesr wrote:Well exactualy pmc, while it would take three days for an action to be resolved. If he doesn't keep it for himself he can start up a new action every As often as well. So every night he did as much as he could it would go as follows.
1. He makes something.
2. He gives it to someone.
3. He makes something else. Someone uses the first thing.
4. He gives it to someone else.
5. He makes a third thing. Someone else uses the second thing.
6. He gives the third thing to a somebody.
7. He makes a fourth iem. Somebody uses the third thing.
8. He gives the fourth item to some person.
9. He creates object #5. Some person use the fourth item.
So by night nine he could have actually made 5 things, not just 2.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users