Resort Mafia Endgame, The Grand Finale

by / on Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:51 pm

Correction: 11 players have their votes, still takes 6 to lynch though.

by **Talapus** on Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:56 pm

/ wrote:Correction: 11 players have their votes, still takes 6 to lynch though.

If that is the resorts idea of an apology for a guests death then I hope you are comfortable washing dishes and stipping and making my bed 4 times a day I I refuse to sleep on less then 4 hour old cleaned sheets. Where is everyone else anyway? I know I can't be the only guest still here.

by **shieldgenerator7** on Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:15 pm

Wow, Praise the Lord, I still have my vote and have not gambled it away. I dislike gambling.
Anyway, goodbye Swami Pravi (mr. Squirrel) we all will miss you!

I'm not sure where to go from here.

by **Mr. Squirrel** on Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:43 pm

by **chapcrap** on Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:16 pm

Well for starters, I'll tell you who all who I blocked.

I nominated shield, pancakemix, iliad, and VioIet to be blocked and I chose to block 4. When I do this it includes myself, so there were 5 of us. We all got blocked except shield.

by **pancakemix** on Tue Jun 07, 2011 12:12 am

All that really tells us is that of those 4, all but shield couldn't have been the killer. Not exactly the most helpful bit of info. That, and you're out of commission for tonight.

I'll have to take a look back see if any other leads present themselves. Unless anyone has a better idea.

by **safariguy5** on Tue Jun 07, 2011 12:39 am

All of my abilities are day abilities, I have no night abilities. Just FYI in case chap was planning on blocking me.

Also, can we prod the inactives like Tails?

by **Haggis_McMutton** on Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:31 am

/ wrote:Correction: 11 players have their votes, still takes 6 to lynch though.

phew, I was actually slightly scared that there'd be only 5 people left with votes or so :lol:

by **shieldgenerator7** on Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:27 am

Ok, thanks, chap. Thanks for clearing me as town. Anyway, why did you choose me exactly?

by **ShaggyDan** on Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:38 am

Gah, upon closer inspection of my message history I didn't send my bet. I still have one vote though.

Curse my poor organisational skills.

by **chapcrap** on Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:28 am

shieldgenerator7 wrote:Ok, thanks, chap. Thanks for clearing me as town. Anyway, why did you choose me exactly?

You didn't really get cleared. You weren't blocked and everyone else was. I chose you because I felt like you weren't as active in the thread since your new role.

pancakemix wrote:All that really tells us is that of those 4, all but shield couldn't have been the killer. Not exactly the most helpful bit of info. That, and you're out of commission for tonight.

I'll have to take a look back see if any other leads present themselves. Unless anyone has a better idea.

Not really sure that it clears you and the other 2 unless there is only one scum. If there are multiple scums, you guys could still be it, right?

safariguy5 wrote:All of my abilities are day abilities, I have no night abilities. Just FYI in case chap was planning on blocking me.

Also, can we prod the inactives like Tails?

I'll keep that in mind if I'm still around for night 3. I'm blocked for tomorrow. And I'm all for prodding an inactive. I still have a vote. vote Tails

by **F1fth** on Wed Jun 08, 2011 1:03 pm

No vote for me. Curse my meddlesome affinity for gambling. I guess I'm just here to make some noise today.

So we pursue leads from yesterday (really only one, Steaker) or does someone have a different avenue to take us down? Also a question for chap: I understand that if you block yourself you can do nothing the next night. Is that true of those you block or are they blocked on the night the action is sent?

by / on Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:10 pm

Sure, I will prod everyone who hasn't posted this game day tomorrow.

by **chapcrap** on Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:38 pm

/ wrote:Sure, I will prod everyone who hasn't posted this game day tomorrow.

Well done!

by **chapcrap** on Thu Jun 09, 2011 10:36 pm

/ wrote:Sure, I will prod everyone who hasn't posted this game day tomorrow.

It's been over a day and still no one posts? I say start the prodding. Tails has said he was sorry for inactivity, but hasn't got in here yet. I'm still leaving my vote on him.

by **ShaggyDan** on Fri Jun 10, 2011 12:00 am

chapcrap wrote:Well for starters, I'll tell you who all who I blocked.

I nominated shield, pancakemix, iliad, and VioIet to be blocked and I chose to block 4. When I do this it includes myself, so there were 5 of us. We all got blocked except shield.

Okay the only thing from that we can determaine is that pancakemix, illiad, violet and yourself were not responsible for the kill last night (assuming you're telling the truth; which I pretty much believe you are).

Although honestly, I don't think it clears them too much. We could have multiple killers (just stopped one of them), although the flavour in the scene sounds like 2 people tried to kill but one was saved (quoted below). We could also have lynchers, poisoners... god knows what else.

/ wrote:Night One
The psychic calls his next volunteer "You young lady come on up and-" he is cut off as the stage collapses on him and the last volunteer, instantly killing the later. At the same time the previous performer can be heard screaming from a distance, only one could be saved, a medic springs into action and leaves the auditorium.

Also the ruby mentioned earlier in the scene could possibly mean something? *Shrugs* Not really an important bit of information atm I guess.

As for today, with people not being able to vote I predict a bit of lapse in activity by them

. After re-reading D1 I've had nothing pop out at me enough to build a case. Aside from that we could easily re-visit the bandwagon on Streaker from the end of yesterday. Although the circumstances are different (no imposing deadline) the points are still the same. That said, some D2 conversation would be nice. Thoughts?

by **shieldgenerator7** on Fri Jun 10, 2011 6:26 am

Yeah I'm just posting to look active right now. I really have not much to say, just glad I didn't get a prod.
Maybe I'll reread later and come up with something.

by **Commander9** on Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:55 am

Prod received. Will re-read and post when I'll have more time. Apologies, but I barely had any time for any mafia games recently.

by **evilchaos** on Fri Jun 10, 2011 4:56 pm

So, thoughts everyone? Who are you finding suspicious? I can't think of anyone at the moment who would go after Squirrel.

by **Talapus** on Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:09 pm

evilchaos wrote:So, thoughts everyone? Who are you finding suspicious? I can't think of anyone at the moment who would go after Squirrel.

You are assuming also that squirrel was the target. From one of the day scenes already we came to the conclusion there is a busdriver. So I'm not sure we should focus so much on squirrel as it may have been a fluke. Looking back I couldn't see any reason why someone would want to target squirrel, so really don't think this helps us at all. Not that I need help of course, I'm too important to die. I might fret over the loss a tourist though momentarily as it does mean less people for me to make fun of or converse with. However it will only be momentarily. Finally, the managment here and their lack of actions to fix any of our current issues is completely deplorable. I tried to buy this place and fire all of them, however the owner has yet to be found and respond.

by **chapcrap** on Fri Jun 10, 2011 8:46 pm

Talapus wrote:
evilchaos wrote:So, thoughts everyone? Who are you finding suspicious? I can't think of anyone at the moment who would go after Squirrel.

You are assuming also that squirrel was the target. From one of the day scenes already we came to the conclusion there is a busdriver. So I'm not sure we should focus so much on squirrel as it may have been a fluke. Looking back I couldn't see any reason why someone would want to target squirrel, so really don't think this helps us at all. Not that I need help of course, I'm too important to die. I might fret over the loss a tourist though momentarily as it does mean less people for me to make fun of or converse with. However it will only be momentarily. Finally, the managment here and their lack of actions to fix any of our current issues is completely deplorable. I tried to buy this place and fire all of them, however the owner has yet to be found and respond.

I'd go after someone who isn't being active and see if we can stir them up that way. There are quite a few people it seems like. Or am I wrong about this? Do you think the scum is being active or inactive?

by **evilchaos** on Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:09 pm

chapcrap wrote:
Talapus wrote:
evilchaos wrote:So, thoughts everyone? Who are you finding suspicious? I can't think of anyone at the moment who would go after Squirrel.

You are assuming also that squirrel was the target. From one of the day scenes already we came to the conclusion there is a busdriver. So I'm not sure we should focus so much on squirrel as it may have been a fluke. Looking back I couldn't see any reason why someone would want to target squirrel, so really don't think this helps us at all. Not that I need help of course, I'm too important to die. I might fret over the loss a tourist though momentarily as it does mean less people for me to make fun of or converse with. However it will only be momentarily. Finally, the managment here and their lack of actions to fix any of our current issues is completely deplorable. I tried to buy this place and fire all of them, however the owner has yet to be found and respond.

I'd go after someone who isn't being active and see if we can stir them up that way. There are quite a few people it seems like. Or am I wrong about this? Do you think the scum is being active or inactive?

Lurking is a scum tell, but at the same time, experienced scum knows to remain active because lurking is a scum tell. Scum tells change from player to player, in my opinion. If I'm looking at a new player, then lurking would be a scum tell. If I'm looking at Sully (for example), then lurking might just be due to laziness/things going on in real life and I'd have to evaluate other posts.

by **evilchaos** on Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:10 pm

evilchaos wrote:Lurking is a scum tell, but at the same time, experienced scum knows to remain active because lurking is a scum tell. Scum tells change from player to player, in my opinion. If I'm looking at a new player, then lurking would be a scum tell. If I'm looking at Sully (for example), then lurking might just be due to laziness/things going on in real life and I'd have to evaluate other posts.

EBWOP: Sully was used as an example of someone who is experienced, not someone who is prone to be lazy. =P

by **pancakemix** on Sat Jun 11, 2011 8:23 am

evilchaos wrote:
chapcrap wrote:
Talapus wrote:
evilchaos wrote:So, thoughts everyone? Who are you finding suspicious? I can't think of anyone at the moment who would go after Squirrel.

You are assuming also that squirrel was the target. From one of the day scenes already we came to the conclusion there is a busdriver. So I'm not sure we should focus so much on squirrel as it may have been a fluke. Looking back I couldn't see any reason why someone would want to target squirrel, so really don't think this helps us at all. Not that I need help of course, I'm too important to die. I might fret over the loss a tourist though momentarily as it does mean less people for me to make fun of or converse with. However it will only be momentarily. Finally, the managment here and their lack of actions to fix any of our current issues is completely deplorable. I tried to buy this place and fire all of them, however the owner has yet to be found and respond.

I'd go after someone who isn't being active and see if we can stir them up that way. There are quite a few people it seems like. Or am I wrong about this? Do you think the scum is being active or inactive?

Lurking is a scum tell, but at the same time, experienced scum knows to remain active because lurking is a scum tell. Scum tells change from player to player, in my opinion. If I'm looking at a new player, then lurking would be a scum tell. If I'm looking at Sully (for example), then lurking might just be due to laziness/things going on in real life and I'd have to evaluate other posts.

Regardless of that, it's certainly a good place to start. Tails gave a public apology for inactivity, so I recommend another avenue. It probably doesn't help that most people are voteless today though. That's certainly going to play a factor in activity.

by **safariguy5** on Sat Jun 11, 2011 12:38 pm

Yes, being voteless does take away some of the ability to read bandwagons and take sides.

Resort Mafia Endgame, The Grand Finale

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Re: Resort Mafia Day Two, Unpredictable Turn

Who is online