Moderator: Community Team
captainwalrus wrote:nope, Although after a confusing day one and two, I have now learned that I have been town the whole time, despite being let to believe I was scum, which is nice. Did anyone read my bit on wercool?
wercool wrote:how do i defend agaist a submarining, mabey by saing im not
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
Wolverine Mutant wrote:I have been observing but have not posted. I'm pretty sure that, even if it could be suspicious, this doesn't make me positively guilty, does it?
UTAlan wrote:I am suspicious of wercool now, but don't want anyone to come in and hammer him after me. For now, I'll unvote, but wercool needs to make a better defense than "I'm not submarining."
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
safariguy5 wrote:Wolverine Mutant wrote:I have been observing but have not posted. I'm pretty sure that, even if it could be suspicious, this doesn't make me positively guilty, does it?
Again, with the wercool case, simply observing can be misconstrued as submarining. Even if you don't really have anything to accuse anyone about, posting about someone who may be submarining is a good way to stay active. Especially in a relatively large game such as this one.
wercool wrote:still reading, still not sub-ing. should i claim?
wercool wrote:im a doc
Rainbow Eater wrote:wercool wrote:im a doc
specifics?
Rainbow Eater wrote:Rainbow Eater wrote:wercool wrote:im a doc
specifics?
a claim this vague in your current position will not get you anywhere but dead.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users