Moderator: Community Team
Yomiel wrote:We couldn't choose-we had to give it up. All we got to pick was who gave theirs up. We couldn't both keep them, and we couldn't choose who it got passed on to. And I myself said that the item was essentially useless because of the restrictions. On top of my role, it kind of hampered my enjoyment. I kind of wish I had been Mafia.@_@ But I'm not. And I've been to inactive to plot much of anything these past few days. Still not on my normal computer, and it's thrown me off.
I'm casting my suspicion on hippo, who is clearly trying to twist facts for some reason. I don't see how my item or it's disappearance could be a red herring.
vodean wrote:honestly, i dont see too much in the spiesr case... the main points are that he used WIFOM that may be invalid, and he tried to get others to discuss... doesn't seem to scummy to me. in fact, to push so hard against him seems scummier than anything. unvote vote hippo
thehippo8 wrote:spiesr wrote:My interpretation of the walkie talkie deal. Based on Yomiel's claim it appears that: Yomiel and Nebuchadnezzar both had a walkie talkie item. This item allowed them some form of limited communication. (From the sound of it, it seems as if their messages had to be sent through the mod.) Yomiel is claiming a lot of restrictions on what you could say with it, which in my opinion severely hamper the potential usefulness. Additionally, he says that the owners of these items could choose to voluntarily give up their item, passing it to another player. (Yomiel, if you gave up the walkie talkie could you choose you got it next, or was it "random.")
One thing to keep in mind about all of this, is that this claim itself doesn't clear Yomiel as being town. There isn't any reason why an owner of this pseudo mason item couldn't be scum.
This is a rather heavy scum tell in my book. In the one breath Spiesr says that Yomiel is likely town or a mason (third party) yet in the next breath ... let's lynch him. This is sheeping at its worst.
thehippo8 wrote:
Spiesr's next comment is fluff. Heis final comment today thus far is ...spiesr wrote:My interpretation of the walkie talkie deal. Based on Yomiel's claim it appears that: Yomiel and Nebuchadnezzar both had a walkie talkie item. This item allowed them some form of limited communication. (From the sound of it, it seems as if their messages had to be sent through the mod.) Yomiel is claiming a lot of restrictions on what you could say with it, which in my opinion severely hamper the potential usefulness. Additionally, he says that the owners of these items could choose to voluntarily give up their item, passing it to another player. (Yomiel, if you gave up the walkie talkie could you choose you got it next, or was it "random.")
One thing to keep in mind about all of this, is that this claim itself doesn't clear Yomiel as being town. There isn't any reason why an owner of this pseudo mason item couldn't be scum.
This is a rather heavy scum tell in my book. In the one breath Spiesr says that Yomiel is likely town or a mason (third party) yet in the next breath ... let's lynch him. This is sheeping at its worst.
Thanks for finding that. I was wondering myself if the scenes were accurate or not, but I couldn't find anything that said either way.thehippo8 wrote:crazymilkshake5 wrote:Color is not alignment, nothing of use is shown in lynch scenes.
I would say that reaching that conclusion based on what there was there is not a certainty. It would have been possible for the two to have been both scum, but the "information" presented doesn't portray that for sure. Not that it matters anymore.thehippo8 wrote:Only problem with this logic is that the flavour would be the robber and the murderer are both scum (kind of logical given their descriptions) so rather a waste of time t expect one to squeal on the other!
First of all "mason" does not mean third party. Mason is an ability that can be assigned to a player of any alignment, allowing them to communicate with another player. The way Yomiel described his item allows to to presumably work the same for scum as it does for town. (Especially since it explicitly moves around.) That said, I was not trying to suggest that we lynch Yomiel today, just pointing out (so nobody forgets) that what Yomiel has claimed about his item does not tell us anything about his alignment. He can be scum, that doesn't mean he is anymore likely to be so than anybody else, but not less likely either.thehippo8 wrote:Spiesr's next comment is fluff. Heis final comment today thus far is ...This is a rather heavy scum tell in my book. In the one breath Spiesr says that Yomiel is likely town or a mason (third party) yet in the next breath ... let's lynch him. This is sheeping at its worst.spiesr wrote:My interpretation of the walkie talkie deal. Based on Yomiel's claim it appears that: Yomiel and Nebuchadnezzar both had a walkie talkie item. This item allowed them some form of limited communication. (From the sound of it, it seems as if their messages had to be sent through the mod.) Yomiel is claiming a lot of restrictions on what you could say with it, which in my opinion severely hamper the potential usefulness. Additionally, he says that the owners of these items could choose to voluntarily give up their item, passing it to another player. (Yomiel, if you gave up the walkie talkie could you choose you got it next, or was it "random.")
One thing to keep in mind about all of this, is that this claim itself doesn't clear Yomiel as being town. There isn't any reason why an owner of this pseudo mason item couldn't be scum.
Can you clarify this point? I don't see what am I doing that is the same as what I said about Zimmah.thehippo8 wrote:You may remember that spiesr said this ...Isn't Spiesr now doing exactly what he was sayign Zimmah shouldn't be doing?spiesr wrote:Zimmah is basically making a strawman argument here. I don't believe that Pershy, or anyone else, ever really indicated that he thought Zimmah was trying to tie him up by making a case on him so he couldn't make a case a against a scum mat or something.zimmah wrote:funny how you keep saying i'm silencing you from your case, yet you never presented any in the first place. and besides, let's assume you DID have a (solid) case on anyone, wouldn't i just make it worse for both myself ánd whoever i'm 'protecting' if i made such a fuzz about you? think about it, do i look that stupid to you?This is interesting. It seems to me like you are tying to win support for your case by simply saying it is awesome, and in my opinion you aren't really able to back this claim up at all. This case has non-trivial flaws that pershy has pointed out, and which you seem to be completely missing the point of.zimmah wrote:i believe this is one of the best day 1 cases i have ever seen in fact. it's way up there at least, tell me if i'm wrong.
I kinda thought that this was a joke on Day 1.Can you please explain it so I can understand what you were getting at?thehippo8 wrote:And just in case you forgot my day 1 case against Spiesr (which seems to have been ignored) ...thehippo8 wrote:Unvote vote spiesr ... jokevote stage is designed to bring out scumminess. Jokevote stage is officially over (for me anyway). That was one of the scummiest comments I've seen in a long time. Defensive, unnecessary, finger-pointy, pious, rediculous, smarmy, high-flalutent, finger-pointing, obfuscatory, all round scummy. The Vodean and Ymiel stuff is fluff but your response is scum on the nose. You want discussion? Discuss!spiesr wrote:We are currently crawling towards actual discussion. It would be nice if you would join us and contribute in a meaningful way instead of just continuing to make jokes.happyfeet wrote:unvote vote spiesr because you were the last one to post
zimmah wrote:mason is usually town. mafia can communicate anyway.
A mafia member can be a mason with a town member.zimmah wrote:mason is usually town. mafia can communicate anyway.
It is still Day, as you can easily see from the thread title or the absence of a post indicating the end of the day. And it will presumably remain day until we reach a lynch or the deadline expires on Wednesday. Currently things have stalled. We don't have much for solid leads and (I at least) don't know how we should proceed. Do you have any suggestions to get us back on track?Yomiel wrote:Is it still Day? No one has posted anything in two days, so I'd kind of thought it was Night.>_>
Yomiel wrote:Let's just kill Vodean. It's what my instincts tell me, but it's not based on anything.
vodean wrote:does anyone have any objections for the lynch? / has voiced some, but still seems pro. if im gonna be hammering, i dont want to come under a ton of scrutiny unless people are actually in support. lets be sure before we do this.
vodean wrote:honestly, i dont see too much in the spiesr case... the main points are that he used WIFOM that may be invalid, and he tried to get others to discuss... doesn't seem to scummy to me. in fact, to push so hard against him seems scummier than anything. unvote vote hippo
crazymilkshake5 wrote:Vote Count
Hippo-Vodean
Vodean-/, pershy, jonty, ???-L3
Deadline is July 11th. No set time, whenever i feel like it.
/ wrote:We seem to be missing shield, dazza and IB, the later likely because of a PR...
Hm, upon reading back, actually I do think vodean is acting scummy.vodean wrote:does anyone have any objections for the lynch? / has voiced some, but still seems pro. if im gonna be hammering, i dont want to come under a ton of scrutiny unless people are actually in support. lets be sure before we do this.
this seems odd, why is it so important to not come under scrutiny? The only ones who NEED to look town under all circumstances are scum. it seems like trying to play off the blame on someone else.vodean wrote:honestly, i dont see too much in the spiesr case... the main points are that he used WIFOM that may be invalid, and he tried to get others to discuss... doesn't seem to scummy to me. in fact, to push so hard against him seems scummier than anything. unvote vote hippo
And this, OMGUSing for spiesr upon the hippo's case, could be buddying tactic, or something more, why do you object to it so strongly?
With all that happened yesterday concerning vode, we could probably devise some further info from this case no matter how it turns out.
Vote vode
Yomiel wrote:Vote: Vodean
Spiesr - 7
Zimmah 5
Yomiel - 8
IB - 2
Jonty - 4
Vodean - 6
Epitaph - 6
Pershy - 3
/ - 3
thshippo - 3
Users browsing this forum: No registered users