Moderator: Community Team
Ragian wrote: There's no need to rush this.
nagerous wrote:How is a typo a mistake. I have told people before that I make posts on iPad and iPhone so it likes to auto correct my posts before I press send and this has led to awkward conversations people here who have spoken to me on facebook can testify to this like callling Mandy 'dad' when I typed XD the phone sometimes has a mind of its own.
nagerous wrote:Benga yuh made the mistake one by skimming and not seeing I EBWOP'd straight away and secondly by thinking there is a doctor in the game when any town role will know that this is unlikely at this stage due to the 'building' element.
nagerous wrote:Secondly strike I am not sure what you mean by my defence? The character question was another test for benga which he failed by not answering it/dodging it. I was actually trying to help him out as if he wasn't lying which he clearly is he would have been able to give an answer to my 'character' question for which I used a deliberately ambiguous word. Again anyone who is town should be able to infer what I am referring to here and there is no necessity to spell it out for people at this stage in the game
nagerous wrote:Mafia is a game of manipulation and subterfuge - people lie!
TimWoodbury wrote:quite honestly benga i think your being a total shyt player right now you aint making any since at all talking about mistake or mistake its the same fucking thing.... he had a typo and corrected it minutes later. you responded to teh 1st post in the middle of the page and then decided oh i gotta go to bed instead of finishing the page thats what is total BS im not bealiveing your stupid dumb ass story at all. you called him on the typo hopeing that you could get away with it and then tomarrow say oh well he claimed doc so that must be why he died
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:Unvote Benga I may go back to this. I can kinda buy his reasoning for the Dakky defense but then he goes back to looking like hes clutching at straws.
benga wrote:strike wolf wrote:Unvote Benga I may go back to this. I can kinda buy his reasoning for the Dakky defense but then he goes back to looking like hes clutching at straws.
I think that I have also pointed how case on me is based on straws. There lies all the irony of arguments presented against me.
dakky21 wrote:Am I the only one to notice there were 12 posts since the last vote count on Tuesday?
BTW, on Tue it was 11 to lynch, today it should be 9... and since no one unvoted benga, he should be on L-2 by now.
So as I said, it's better to lynch a survivor than mislynch a town, I'll keep my vote there, but all of you should know that he will be lynched by Saturday if no one unvotes.
dakky21 wrote:As people said before, lynching survivor is better than mis-lynching town. If benga is a survivor at all.
Of course, lynching scum would be ideal, but no one is going to claim scum, right? (just asking)
So me thinks something will come out of this lynch, at least we will see who was on the bandwagon and whose reasons were too weak. If Benga flips scum, then we'll at least know who didn't vote him and have another point of view.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I have noticed. I also noticed that Strike unvoted.
So you know there is poor activity, and what do you do about it?
You say you are happy to lynch Benga becuase then we can see who has weak cases on D2 and lynch them. Well your case if absolute garbage. Yours is the weakest case of them all.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:You are asking me to help you out by being explicit and sharing info with scum?
That is what you are asking.
So no. I wont
ga7 wrote:I was thinking in general fwiw, pointing out a possible doc claim is scummy even though it was clearly an erroneous claim
keyword 1 wrote:in general
keyword 2 wrote:erroneous
TimWoodbury wrote:and also if he had in fact claimed doc why would you as town wanna point it out so quickly...cant be in towns interest to point that out as if he was doc he would be needed would he not be...you played enough that you would know not to point that out,However it can be looked at from the opposite side as skum you wouldnt wanna point it out either for the same reason i above pointed out. im unshure of you at the momemt and not going to rush a vote
madmitch wrote:@ Tim with your last statement to Benga ,I think you are also not a Nation and probally a scum partner with Benga. FOS TIM
madmitch wrote:VOTE BENGA His statement to to Nag about being a docter shows he has not the same goals as we (town) do.
Fircoal wrote:First off why do you think that Nag is claiming doctor? Doesn't that seem a bit weird? Mitch is correct here. There is no reason for another town member to expect a doc claim. So either you're trying to set a trap or you're clueless.
Second you didn't even bother to check Nag's second post which he corrected the typo. So if you're trying to set up a trap it's a pretty poor one. Explain just what you're trying to do here. What made you compelled to think that Nag is a doctor?
Fircoal wrote:Because claiming as a doc seems like a weird claim to make, doesn't it?
HotShot53 wrote:nagerous wrote:Yes but within this set up a doctor claim at day 1 would make even less sense
I know what you're saying, I guess I just thought Benga also thought it didn't make any sense, thus resulting in the question. Obviously most think Benga instead just has no idea about the game setup, meaning he is likely scum, which combined with his other statements is possible. It's as good as any other day 1 case so far anyway
strike wolf wrote:@Benga: Misunderstanding the doc part isn't really a valid argument at this point as it would only apply if you were claiming to be town and the argument of you announcomg you thought someone soft claimed doc as being scummy for erroneously trying to out a doc is a small enough point that I dont really care right now. I am more of the position that a. Celts seems like a BS claim. B. The whole buddying up with Dakky thing was strange at best. I admit I don't fully know what to think about the Germany fake soft claim at this moment but defending a player seems like an awfully risky strategy for third party.
nagerous wrote:Secondly strike I am not sure what you mean by my defence? The character question was another test for benga which he failed by not answering it/dodging it. I was actually trying to help him out as if he wasn't lying which he clearly is he would have been able to give an answer to my 'character' question for which I used a deliberately ambiguous word. Again anyone who is town should be able to infer what I am referring to here and there is no necessity to spell it out for people at this stage in the game
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Nag. What is the difference between Benga and Ga7? Both made the same error, one has justified it, one hasnt.
So guys, still think my playstyle is unhelpful? Or do you realise how depressingly little information you lot have generated? Exception of Strikewolf who tried valiently for a short while.
benga wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:benga wrote:@nag
did you just claim doc? why would you do that?
Because Nag is not very good at mafia?
However, can you explain what leads you to believe that there is a Doc in the game D1?
not sure what you mean?
benga wrote:nagerous wrote:Benga yuh made the mistake one by skimming and not seeing I EBWOP'd straight away and secondly by thinking there is a doctor in the game when any town role will know that this is unlikely at this stage due to the 'building' element.
So did I made mistake or was I skimming? I already said it was honest pre-bedtime overlook to not see EBWOP, but that doesn't mean you did intentionally write it like that.
Djfireside wrote:Good Morrow fellow Civilizations. Look forward to forging the great world with you all.
In regards to current transgressions, I tend to side with Nag having a Typo as well since he has clearly stated why the typo would be such. It makes sense to me now for while I watched from afar I could not fully understand.
As for the minor civilization claim, while it fits the style since a minor civ would not follow normal paths of a standard civilization, I am a little weary of it to be stated. I am in agreement with others that lynching him currently will not gather any further information so I understand the push for knowledge and in agreement right now however I am on the side of if you are not with me you are against me so I will remain guarded against Benga but not push any hostilities as I am quite young to this council
I am also a little taken aback by Tim, despite his latest outburst, in all my readings they have been all over the board. Voting quickly on Nag for a statement that was easily dismissed but giving Benga a pass and claiming wont rush to a vote despite already doing so on Nag. Even gathered mitch's FOS as well for the actions.
For now I greet you and look forward to forging our empires
nagerous wrote:benga wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:benga wrote:@nag
did you just claim doc? why would you do that?
Because Nag is not very good at mafia?
However, can you explain what leads you to believe that there is a Doc in the game D1?
not sure what you mean?
This was Benga's initial answer again to your question FYI. Seems scummy as f*ck personally.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
dakky21 wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I have noticed. I also noticed that Strike unvoted.
So you know there is poor activity, and what do you do about it?
You say you are happy to lynch Benga becuase then we can see who has weak cases on D2 and lynch them. Well your case if absolute garbage. Yours is the weakest case of them all.
Why I'm saying this... is because Skoffin didn't post since Sunday. So it's 4 days without a post. And have a war with me. If you were scum, what would be the best protection for you? Of course, going in both peace and war.. which gives you +4 for the lynch... I don't like how Skoffin is playing this... and it's not just him/her, everyone is trying to lay low...
Skoffin wrote:dakky21 wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I have noticed. I also noticed that Strike unvoted.
So you know there is poor activity, and what do you do about it?
You say you are happy to lynch Benga becuase then we can see who has weak cases on D2 and lynch them. Well your case if absolute garbage. Yours is the weakest case of them all.
Why I'm saying this... is because Skoffin didn't post since Sunday. So it's 4 days without a post. And have a war with me. If you were scum, what would be the best protection for you? Of course, going in both peace and war.. which gives you +4 for the lynch... I don't like how Skoffin is playing this... and it's not just him/her, everyone is trying to lay low...
@Fircoal
As mentioned above, it actually makes more sense for third parties not to build as third parties cannot build in the actual game of civ. I personally think both scum/town can build but with some alterations.
Also, did you know that you are playing exactly the same here as you did in the last game?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users