Moderator: Community Team
archer3base wrote:Just an FYI, I'm going to be in Vegas the next 3 days but will try on be on here as much as I can.
crasp wrote:Would help if you pair would stop flirting while i am counting.
Post count since Scene 1 start.
Players Upt 14/3 since
archer3base (4) 8
Bantam (1) 5
charm (9) 6
DB4Christ (9) 9
Gabsensei (7) 14
jusplay4fun (9) 6
Killuminati19 (5) 18
King Edward 3rd (11) 1
legionnaire (14) 9
mookiemcgee (2) 2
SiriusCowKing (8) 15
TheCrown (17) 24
TuffyLess (6) 2
Joak (6) 11
H8 AFK (7) 1
That is up to this post.DB4Christ wrote:Crasp.....can we get a post count, or at least the 5 players with the fewest plz? I don't know about Legion TC......I do have Charm on my list though. Are you saying you think Charm fits #7 and #8 from your list, and that's why your voting her??
TheCrown wrote:3 times she denied me (like Peter ;) ), and I mentioned about having proof and she never came back with anything. She sounded so much like she knew something definite (which I knew would have been false). Then she throws in the words "boobs" and "blonde" and says she is having fun, and these are just all back-peddling words, trying to get you all to think about other things than her lack of showing proof. "OOOPS, he's on to me, better say 'boobs' to distract all the testosterone monkeys about." Just all fishy to me, and if she were a veteran mafia player, I'd be pushing people to vote her, but she's not and I'm not. AND she has said nothing since. Maybe I am harping on this a bit much, but like I said, it seems the scummiest to me.
TheCrown wrote:More thoughts on Charm:
1. Just after mookie "randomly" voted on Sirius, who had previously voted oh him, charm comes in less than an hour and bandwagon votes to get Sirius up to 2 votes. Was she pushing for a quick lynch on Sirius?
TheCrown wrote:then later, charm tries to vote for Tuffy AND Bantam.... that's at least 3 votes is a quick time, plus the accusations on me.
TheCrown wrote:And if DB4 wants to look, Legion talked like crazy the first 4 pages or so of this game.... and is now scarce... anything there DB4?
TheCrown wrote:just thought of this for archer....
You can also see if lynched townie was defended or attacked by players vehemently... that can also give you a hint on people's agenda.
TheCrown wrote:jusplay does seem aweful quick on the defense and voting when mad... but this is just his history of play repeating itself... it's just "jusplay". I think if it were anyone else, other than Wolfz, I would probably seek a claim.
Killuminati19 wrote:Bantam wrote:Well it looks as though I'm the 1 to go - so for the rest of my fellow townies - just take note of all those scum aboard my bandwagon.
I've outlined my position fairly consistently - god gave us two eyes and one mouth for a reason.
No you haven't
Bantam wrote:Killuminati19 wrote:Bantam wrote:Well it looks as though I'm the 1 to go - so for the rest of my fellow townies - just take note of all those scum aboard my bandwagon.
I've outlined my position fairly consistently - god gave us two eyes and one mouth for a reason.
No you haven't
Can I suggest you read the posts again then - when i read the arguments they don''t stack up,
It would seem that a number of people wear the rose-coloured glasses when rating their own judgement.
DB4Christ wrote:I will lay off Bant, as enough feel he has earned some credibility. I don't like Mook's explanation...sorry Mook. Vote: Mook for severe in-activity
TheCrown wrote:Just a note from me:
I hate the "leader gets lynched" part of this in mafia. I had never played it that way before, and hate it. It just seems wrong, and it should be that if there is no consensus, then it is a "no lynch" for the day. I think the rules need to change, as the way we play now caters to the lazy people and makes them lazier. :x
TheCrown wrote:Just a note from me:
I hate the "leader gets lynched" part of this in mafia. I had never played it that way before, and hate it. It just seems wrong, and it should be that if there is no consensus, then it is a "no lynch" for the day. I think the rules need to change, as the way we play now caters to the lazy people and makes them lazier. :x
TheCrown wrote:Just a note from me:
I hate the "leader gets lynched" part of this in mafia. I had never played it that way before, and hate it. It just seems wrong, and it should be that if there is no consensus, then it is a "no lynch" for the day. I think the rules need to change, as the way we play now caters to the lazy people and makes them lazier.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users