kratos644 wrote:Hmm it's not that onix couldn't be placed as a lyncher, however odd that may be, it's the fact that the lyncher usually wins as soon as he lynches his target. Although there are exceptions I will not name them to let him claim that's what he meant. Him being a lyncher is also not what I pinned his role as being which brings me back to this.kratos644 wrote:Army of GOD wrote:Guys, Fissk did nothing wrong, get off his back.
FOS jimfinn and evilchaos for bandwagonningArmy of GOD wrote:FOS freezie for defending those two. I'm really curious as to if they're all working together...
Alright. I'm convinced that AOG and Fissk have characters that are somehow linked. Be it by lovers, best friends, masons, mafia, or maybe some other third party. This blind I must defend fissk attitude seems pretty proving of this. The question will certainly be which though. I guess we'll find out when fissk claims though. If fissk turns out to be scum I know who I'll be looking into on day 2 though. Actually if fissk is scum I guess a cop checking out AOG could be helpful. Unless we feel that there would be enough evidence not to waste the cop investigation on AOG and try one of the other suspicious parties like hank or jonty.
So either AOG is truly just blindly defending fissk or fissk lied in his claim and they are mafia together. The next question that rises for me is why is AOG just blindly defending fissk if fissk is telling the truth? I'm going to keep my vote on AOG because I'm quite suspicious of him right now.
If you think AoG is mafia trying to defend another mafia (Fissk), you can simply vote on Fissk (the mafia that is closer to being lynched).