Moderator: Community Team
[/quote]Marashu wrote:dakky21 wrote:Endgame422 wrote:Dakky was scum in 2/3 of the last games that i was involved with but thats not really the point.
Of course its the jokevote stage so im far from certain he is scum but that comment was strange,he seemed to be trying to downplay the scene "subtly" and it seemed like enough reason to give him a push and see how he reacts.
His reaction doesnt really do much for me and id consider him for a claim later but theres lots of time here. Also, I really am beginning to think Streakers IMOs is to point fingers at as many people as possible to get a reaction then yell scum. Wing I feel makes good claims but sticks with Streak sometimes I think because he likes what Streak says.
Sorry was sick over the weekend. Also, I enjoy being challenged to add to the discussion. Funny, how all of the game start at the same time. Alas, I am fairly certain on two separate instances that both Wing and Streak have called people scum for using the previous manouvers.
Streak has called me scum in a game for posting about peoples activity, saying it was just me trying to get focus off myself. Wing has done the same. We arenāt that far into Day 1 were people cannot still come back and be good contributors. I also like how Wing and Streak seem to play right off each other in either game, confuses my reads on them.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:strike wolf wrote:I just read Dakky's post as "what?" It is completely nonsensical.
If were talking about Strike- In an hour he went from the above to the below without any intervention from End or I.strike wolf wrote:virus90 wrote:havent been in most of the games lately, just a few. so why is dakky scum "again" according to you? (end wing?) i dont see it from the post your referring to.
Endgame422 wrote:OK folks time to liven this one up.
I am 3rd party survivor.
I am the mothman.
I can visit 1 player each night with a warning of "impending disaster" but im also told that some players may suffer "side effects"
My PM was intentionally ambigious about the "disaster" and about the "side effects"
The real story of mothman was that he was sighted 100s of times in the point pleasant area in West Virginia over several months in the late 1960s
Those who had close interactions reported splitting headaches,sickness relating to radiation poisoning(burns/discoloration of the skin and eyes)and hallucinations of the silver bridge crashing into the river.
In 1967 the silver bridge collapsed into the ohio river during rush hour traffic killing 46 people and causing immeasurable damages after which the reports of the mothman abruptly stopped.
I think its been set up so i can basically choose to help either town or scum as whichever faction i visit gains some kind of information.
I like my chances much better with town then against it.
Im thinking this works like rishs "visit" system from EotW where i have unique interactions depending on who i visit.
Im basing that logic off the fact that SOME players will suffer "side-effects" being the way it was written.
Also i think i was designed as a red herring 3rd party as my visits are supposed to appear in the night scenes,which leads me to believe scum is a small faction this game.
That further supports my decision to claim that im 3rd party as i can win alongside town and i like towns chances,especially if i just play like an extra townie.
Now who thinks we should lynch me?
Endgame422 wrote:Pancake i claimed now because i know that this group of players would not have eased off if i claimed under pressure and my last game as 3rd party i lied and pretended to be town and got lynched at what turned out to be Lylo losing the game for both town and myself.
So the only option from my POV was to claim,explain myself as much as i can given my odd role and hope for the best.
To HS/IB lynching me is like pushing through a no lynch,zero chance of hitting scum.
You wont hit town admittedly if you go for me but you learn very little off of my lynch and give scum a free night basically.
Im more valuable to town as an honest opinion/vote that costs you nothing then as a corpse that costs you a day/night cycle.
FPd by tim
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Vote IB
Lynching 3rd Party gives a free nightkill to mafia. IB knows this, yet is pursueing the easiest non-mafia lynch in the game.
Until Endgame claimed, all IB's posts had been attacking Dakky for his terrible play. These in themselves have no alignment indication.
However, taken all together, we have a player who is avoiding commiting to anything and trying to get the easiest targets lynched.IronButterfly wrote:You MAY have had some credibility and reason to be saved if we had witnessed first hand what exactly it is that you do
Yes, so why not wait till D2 and we know what the side effects are? Because then who will be the easy target to lynch D1? My bad, scumhunting is too difficult for you clearly.
Streaker wrote:I need to point out here the game of Harry Potter. Storrzerg did a comparable play, where he claimed 3rd party (and in the end, confirmed third party). While it gives mafia a free kill at night, it does guarantee that a non-town alligned player is lynched. Storrzerg played the town game from day 1 all the way until the very end, where he switched sides and was decisive in mafia victory.
Third party does not equal town alligned. I believe he will do his best for town, until such time as a better opportunity presents itself for him to win the game.
I don't think I want to lynch him now, because we have better odds of lynching scum now then before. Just think it's a bad idea having him around until endgame (lol eh) because it's a liability to town.
Marashu wrote:I don't agree that IB wanting to lynch End is scummy. I don't think it's the right play, but I don't think it's scummy. I can understand him wanting to eliminate a non-town aligned player (who may or may not be anti-town - the "disaster" might be his way of explaining an SK kill), but early game it is normally in a 3P's best interest to work with town, so I don't want to lynch End today. If IB were scum, I don't think he would be raising such a stink about this.
I do believe End is non-town, at the very least. It explains why I feel he hasn't been pushing as hard as he could have been for scumhunting (asking me to back up one of my early reads, and backing down after a short answer without pushing harder). That said, End, you say you'd rather help town, so why not give us some reads?
I liked Mets' post. I also want to hear ptlowe's defense about Streaker's post against him.
FP'd by PancakeMix. As was said, by the time Storr jumped ship, town had already lost and the game on that day was just continuing to see whether Storr was the one to get killed that day (town and mafia had the same number, mafia had 2 night kills that night, and Storr was the swing vote - mafia said they'd let him live if he voted with them that day). As for mitch, most of his posts are fluff and flavourful - he's been getting better at offering reads and asking questions, but he still has a very erratic playstyle.
strike wolf wrote:Madmitch stands out for being mimicry as pCM says but I always find him difficult to read because he can be erratic. The fact that IB is not suggesting any type of scum hilunting stands out to me more than trying to lynch third party. He's better than that and right now he would be my choice for lymch.
As wing said. Storrs didn't decide HP in mafia s favor, town lost that game. I know because we lost in part to my mistakes and inability to press an aage lynch when I was becoming increasingly certain he was scum.
benga wrote:I am not prepared to make case on them or lynch them so I need more info about others.
Especially with ends unpredicatable disasterness, would rather wait for cops investigations.
benga wrote:well you gave me enough to vote streaker
first you wanting to gather up the lynch squad
2nd you really haven't produced anything useful other then just jumping from one guy to another
3rd and yes you are right, I shouldn't just try to lynch random guy, I should pursue someone who has been scummy to me from the start
benga wrote:Streaker wrote:Just to be clear, I'm not particularly interested in lynching dakky at this point, more in other's opinions on wether or not to lynch dakky.
Interesting to note, it seems only wing is trying to stop this bleed of rolefishing.
Virus was only interested in the % that dakky used, nothing else.
he even admits he is gathering people for lynch
dakky21 wrote:Not saying benga isn't town, but your thinking is not what I am thinking so you're currently No1 for the vig kill.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:Can people please work on making sure quote and spoiler tags are done correctly? Some of these posts are practically unreadable.
TimWoodbury wrote:so how bout this
dakky claims his kills each time he kills then we can go from there if dakky dont claim them and somewhat able to explain his reasoning he gets lynched
Endgame we keep him as he is wanting to help town HOWEVER the 1st sign he is looking to harm town HE gets lynched
benga wrote:first you wanting to gather up the lynch squad
2nd you really haven't produced anything useful other then just jumping from one guy to another
3rd and yes you are right, I shouldn't just try to lynch random guy, I should pursue someone who has been scummy to me from the start
Endgame422 wrote:Mitch i understand your slip up on dakky,but why was wing your second choice?
Benga looks like town to me here.
Scum have little need to present new cases here as they have several easy paths to take right now so his small case on streaker reads town to me even though it is OMGUS.
On the case of streaker he is playing very agressive,which im not really used to from him so im not real sure what to make of it here.
He suggested how dangerous i was but then said he isnt really interested in lynching me, he was pushing dakky hard but then suggests we ignore him.
If you arent very convinced in your reads streaker why are pushing them so hard?
benga wrote:can we have vote recap?
Marashu wrote:benga wrote:can we have vote recap?
Here's an unofficial one.
Marashu ā Strike Wolf (1)
Dakky ā pancakemix (1)
TimWoodbury ā virus90, Endgame422, dakky21, IB (4)
Benga ā Marashu (1)
Ptlowe ā streaker (1)
Iron Butterfly - WingCmdr Ginkapo, HotShot (2)
Streaker - benga(1)
Mets - madmitch(1)
strike - ptlowe(1)
Just read over Tim's posts. Tim's usually the kind of player who gets defensive at L-7, and that's not really happening here. He backs off dakky because of some weak excuse about how vig is a town role, when he was recently in a game where he was the vig, but the vig could have been any alignment. Also, with him backing off of dakky, he seems to not have any opinions on who is scum. He's also trying to push how pro-town end is, when a claimed 3P would need to say that for survival anyway. So I could get behind a tim lynch.
Endgame422 wrote:Streaker,benga IS inconsistent but that doesnt mean he is scum.
I imagine if he was scum he would have argued why he isnt scum,instead of why the player voting him is scum.
Everyone knows OMGUS always draws peoples attention and i think scum are typically smart enough not to do it on D1.
Of course you can make WIFOM arguements all day about this but im looking for who is trying to blend in,if thats bengas goal that vote/case against streaker does not serve him very well.
Fpd by wing.
TimWoodbury wrote:dakky21 wrote:TimWoodbury wrote:its dffinatly interesting you wanna kill someone who in the long run COULD be the choosing factor in weather or not town or skum win this thing
It's definitely interesting you don't want to see him dead.
so not wanting to kill someone whom we know right now will help town at the momemt is funny??? maybe down the road we kill him yah but not right now
Streaker wrote:TimWoodbury wrote:virus90 wrote:havent been in most of the games lately, just a few. so why is dakky scum "again" according to you? (end wing?) i dont see it from the post your referring to.
because dakkys ass was skum in the last game so i also agreevote dakky because he must be skum due to ebing skum in last active game
Are you serious, or do you consider this a joke vote/post?
Streaker wrote:benga wrote:dakky is lawys such an easy target, he seems to being able to provoke much interest about his alignment/sex preferences
Do you want to lynch him?
Streaker wrote:Just to be clear, I'm not particularly interested in lynching dakky at this point, more in other's opinions on wether or not to lynch dakky.
Streaker wrote:
Vote virus90
Streaker wrote:EBWOP: wanted to add a question to wing: why Mars?
Streaker wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Vote Marashu
No-one should enjoy playing mafia, thats not the point. The sooner he is out of the game, the sooner the misery can envelope us all.
He's also gone AWOL since this, despite being perma online over the last few days.
Marashu made this post, just yesterday:
On the other hand, metsfanmax and pcm have posted a combined total of 0 times since opening post. You fail to mention them.
Marashu wrote:
Right now, I'm liking IB, I'm liking strike, and I'm liking Streaker.
Vote Benga
Streaker wrote:
Unvote, vote ptlowe
strike wolf wrote:Can people please work on making sure quote and spoiler tags are done correctly? Some of these posts are practically unreadable.
strike wolf wrote:Forgive me if I am wrong but I thought characters were not alignment indicative?
strike wolf wrote:Madmitch stands out for being mimicry as pCM says but I always find him difficult to read because he can be erratic. The fact that IB is not suggesting any type of scum hilunting stands out to me more than trying to lynch third party. He's better than that and right now he would be my choice for lymch.
Marashu wrote:I don't agree that IB wanting to lynch End is scummy. I don't think it's the right play, but I don't think it's scummy. I can understand him wanting to eliminate a non-town aligned player (who may or may not be anti-town - the "disaster" might be his way of explaining an SK kill), but early game it is normally in a 3P's best interest to work with town, so I don't want to lynch End today. If IB were scum, I don't think he would be raising such a stink about this.
Endgame422 wrote:Buddying like this isnt what i would expect out of these 2 or really from any set of 2 players that are both town,especially on D1.
Are you guys reading each other town here? Id like both your opinions on each other.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users