boonetown wrote:firstly, how is anything i've said 'filler'? my pointing out that someone has repeated what others has said without bringing forth any additional information, and saying it's just filler isnt just my opinion, it's fact. i have spoken about a good handful of people, and yes while that's not a lot its all i currently have at the moment. if you think i'm only 'fillering' then i will do my best to change that, i just disagree completely.
onto this role claiming business, how is it that someone can merely ask "are you happy with your role" and get fos'ed the fos out, but someone can outright, in multiple posts, ASK for a claim from someone or else he'll lynch them... and NOT be fos'ed? that's not okay with me.
stop threatening to lynch someone if they dont claim a role. how about you claim your role, or i'll lynch you.
I mentioned under your own definition it's filler because you made a pretty broad range of what is "filler" in this game.
Deadline is tomorrow, this game set-up does not require majority, just most votes. So the person on the block to be lynched has the best interest in claiming so that anyone voting can pull off before they are deadline lynched. It's common knowl... I shouldn't say that, "common sense is not so common", nor is common knowledge.
@ Bunnies, first off Jonty did not say such a thing, he said he FOS's us both. Second, I usually generate heat when I push for cases, some people stay completely quiet while I'm in game so that they can just FOS me and count it as "activity" (I know it's not the case for Jonty as he's been away), but people stay back and wait for me to make the first move as it's easy then to just say "Your case is no good" then hop on the easy bandwagon against me. I never mind it because I know I'm aggressive as hell. If I wasn't aggressive I don't think we'd be seeing some people as active as they are right now.
Right now Boone and Neb aren't high on my radar for D1, I'm narrowed a bit down to 2 people or the No Lynch. With under 24 hours left going after anyone else would be wasting everyone's time. I can easily go back on this day tomorrow and see if any flags are raised. (I guess you could say I am tunneling here as I believe it's a waste of time to build a case on others without any time to do anything with it).
@Strike Wolf. Of course I am interested in the cities. Mafia have no need to ask because they can ask their buddies in each city about all the info all of you have. The only people in the dark are Town and 3rd Party. While maybe there's a 3rd Party that needs info about the cities to do something, we also need that info.
I don't know why others aren't as interested in the cities as I am.
@Betiko, I am sort of iffy on it, but somehow I think Firth is a lyncher role. I'm iffy because there was a small case building on you at the time, but with how MUCH he's pushing as you say in the city, he could very well be a lyncher needing to lynch you to win, then he got all excited when there's a case building D1 on his target and zoom zoom zoom, aggressive to lynch you.
I assume the game mechanic is the Iron Throne thing. It sounds like there's someone looking for it. Mafia would know where it is with spies in each city, so it must be either a town or a 3rd party looking for it.
@Epitaph
StorrZerg wrote:I will confirm There are 4 "locations"
Braavos
Kings Landing
The Dread Fort
Storms End
Sound like cities to me. Braavos, Kings Landing and Dread Fort are cities, I forget which city Storms End is but it's a city as well is it not?
The Iron Throne IS out there (that is a fact stating we know it's out there, but we don't know what it's for as of yet).
Again, just stating Betiko is protected from a lynch and voteless, we know that's a fact. Not the reason why.
Not speculation, Storr said it himself that characters will not determine faction. So as crazy as it is, Tyrion could be mafia, Cersei could be town and Joffery could even be town. That's all it's telling us.
All 5 points are facts, just we are not sure if any of them are important for us to use.
Argument with bunnies is just an argument. I'm pushing for pressure, she's trying to deflect. The thing that detracts from the game is others focusing on the argument and not adding anything constructive to it. Either add something to it or try to build up a better case against ANYONE else. (Right now I think Crasp inactivity case is not too shabby, but the other case on Firth is one that is drawing most of my attention away from bunnies and I'll probably leave my vote on Firth if nothing more comes from the argument with bunnies).
@IB, you know you love me though <3 Send some hugs my way
@Bunnies, it's confirmed just to do with him now. There's a vote now on Firth that is counting. That's why my option of going on Firth day break tomorrow still stands.
Wow... I missed Crasp's raging post due to it being mostly a quote I assumed I already read what was quoted but then went back to read after seeing Bunnies' comment. Looking at the voting thread (COME ON GUYS, SAY THAT YOU VOTE HERE AS WELL, helps us all out..) Looks like the noose around Crasp is tightening, so that means my small case on bunnies will not pick up any heat what so ever. So
Unvote. It wasn't bad for a Day 1 case but there's bigger fish to fry now.
@Zivel, arrogant? More like...

... in theorizing and overthinking things.
(
No rule about posting a small picture right Storr? XD)
Anyway,
Vote Crasp. That whole rage page was uncalled for. This is Mafia, chill. Everyone is at each other's throats from time to time but no need to have a spas attack about being voted for. It happens. It's Day 1. Here's to hoping to a 3rd party/mafia lynch tomorrow. I think there's good odds of at least hitting a third party if nothing else.
I will come back to the thing on Firth though, you're only saved due to Crasp's rage. (Hey, that rhymed.. sorta).