DoomYoshi wrote:I was trying to lay low but Commander called me out on it and then saf built his case from there.
OMGuising? Nice.
Sorry that I've pointed that you were laying low and not contributing at all. Geee...

Moderator: Community Team
DoomYoshi wrote:I was trying to lay low but Commander called me out on it and then saf built his case from there.
A little schizophrenic there? That is supposed to be my job. It's the bees I tell you, mind control!edocsil wrote:I don't want some scum to come in here and hammer our supposed doc.edocsil wrote:God I wish someone would just hammer so this cockup would be over.
spiesr wrote:A little schizophrenic there? That is supposed to be my job. It's the bees I tell you, mind control!
Anyhow, so yoshi appears to be claiming our now suicidal doc. So what do we do now? Lynch him anyway? Go find yet another person? Go back to lynch AD?
safariguy5 wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:It is not a WIFOM argument. I am saying that the same action should be taken regardless of whether she is mafia, knowing full well that she is most likely town. When I say frame, I didn't mean the mafia ability frame. I meant the mafia would kill someone who had voted for violet in order to frame her in the eyes of the town. That is why I had earlier stated that my opinions could get me killed, as I am the perfect target.
Then it's a WIFOM argument again. Mafia might think that we think they're going to frame Vio with the kill and kill someone who didn't hop on the bandwagon. In fact, when I'm mafia, we usually leave the people who make accusations around because it's easier to pin blame on them later. It's a circular argument, we cannot use what we think the mafia is going to do as basis for what we do now. All we can do is see what the mafia did and then try to go from there.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
safariguy5 wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Before I defend myself saf and edoc, humour me with an answer to a n00b question: how many docs are usually in an 11 player game?
Usually 1, but there can be no set doc and have say a JOAT with protect and bodyguard combo to compensate. Jailkeeper is also a possibility. But a straight up saving role is usually just 1.
Drabod wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:edocsil wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:I am 100% telling the truth.
Doesn't make any sense to go and kill two townies when there is no harm, no foul, right? Victor didn't get lynched and everyone is still alive, so after I get done with class and work today, I'll browse through a quick re-read and see what's up. If you guys REALLY want me to die, though... Someone is coming with me.
There is a distinct chance that we will have one dead townie, but why would you try to hammer on a foolish case? Surely you know the time and lynches would be spent on you. It is not the action of a townie, it is the action of 3rd party who has little care for who dies or a scum trying to cover his tracks.
Or someone trying to move past Day 1.
Patience is key on day 1, theres no point rushing a game or mistakes would be made, only scum/third party will care about this i dont believe his claim hes trying to stay alive UNVOTE VOTE ANARK
edocsil wrote:IMO I think Yoshi or PCM would be the best possible lynches. You already know my thoughts on PCM. Yoshi waffled quite a bit between Nark and Vic, trying to follow public opinion but really just drawing attention to himself. others have also stated cases against him that I find plausible.
Unvote Vote Yoshi
Also Nark, I do desire to know if your lover has a protection.
safariguy5 wrote:Again, the main crux of my case on you was the vote on victor when people suspected nark. The vote looks like you're trying to stay active as scum but fear the possibility of the bomb taking you out.
Drabod wrote:Doom Yoshi - This player has been the most suspicious in my eyes throughout the game, firstly he tried to push the case on victor even though victors claiming to be the doc even though anark had claimed to be a bomb at the time. Then he has now quickly changed his mind and is "spiritually" voting anark. Both of the claimed roles are effective when used well to the town and key for the town to succeed. So spirtually i feel he has no case on either of them as i previously stated.
Commander9 wrote:Unless someone counter claims, why should we kill our doc? He may be acting out and playing a bit idiotic,
safariguy5 wrote:Just going on record here, you're going to look really bad if I get killed because I am not mafia.
safariguy5 wrote:From a game balance standpoint, I find it hard to believe that we would have both a JOAT and a doctor in an 11 player game. Whoever we end up lynching, I'm pretty sure 1 out of these two is mafia.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
DoomYoshi wrote:Don't think I didn't notice the character smear there. By claiming I am idiotic, you are lowering the level of suspicion on my claim towards you.
DoomYoshi wrote:Here comes the piece of evidence anyone needs to kill me: I have lost the pm which had my name in it. All I can remember is that I am the doctor.
As for your final point, I never claimed I had half the game figured out until I was on my deathbed anyway. The speculating that annoyed you were simply ideas.
To your advice on how I should defend myself, I still disagree that the cases were anything but flimsy.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
mafiawiki wrote:A town player is going to be actively trying to find scum and determine who is town, while a scum player is looking to score points, or win arguments. This leads to different arguing styles.
DoomYoshi wrote:I looked up the word scumtell and I found this on the page:mafiawiki wrote:A town player is going to be actively trying to find scum and determine who is town, while a scum player is looking to score points, or win arguments. This leads to different arguing styles.
So the fact that I wasn't concerned about my attack is not (according to the above wiki article) scumtell.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
safariguy5 wrote:Yes, PCM could definitely be under scrutiny for accusing Commander of vote hopping. However, I'm not buying the evidence of him not responding to joke cases. If the case isn't something substantive, you cannot expect someone to respond seriously. However, since a false accusation of vote hopping is the scummiest piece of behavior we have so far and really what you're looking for on Day 1 anyways, I think PCM is the best candidate.
unvote vote PCM
safariguy5 wrote:Ok, well my thoughts on pcm is that he might have said some suspicious things, but nothing really out and out scummy to me. Vio was trying to get the game going again, and Drabod seems to have woken up. Victor, let's face it, is probably too busy with other things to consistently post in here. If we're going to lynch someone for submarining, why not go for the guy who's probably going to be the least active is not nonexistent in all likelihood in the coming days? Dead weight best shed now.
unvote vote Victor
No knock on you as a player Sully, but you have that newsletter stuff and are really busy. I just don't think you can concentrate on everything at once.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
DoomYoshi wrote:If I turn out to be town, it doesn't mean that Saf is mafia. If Saf turns out to be town, it doesn't mean that I am mafia. I don't understand how a quick lynch can help anyone other than mafia at this point. The back and forth will end. Soon, assuming sax agrees to my request for a resending of my role.
Well, of course you are hesitant to blame people for agreeing with you, that would imply that you were at the very least wrong.Commander9 wrote:To be fair, I probably started the AD Bw, but it was fully justified - I would not blame anyone for participating in it.
Interestingly enough, my second choice for a lynch would be you, so I don't imagine that you would vig yourself for me now would you?Anarkistsdream wrote:How about this? You guys all get to vote who I vig in the night, as well. I will vig that person.
Well, I can say this about safariguy, he is very much aware of the framer role. I had a cult alignment framer role in his Modern Warfare mafia, so I can see how he would come to think of the actual role when DoomYoshi mentioned "framing." (Amusingly enough, if memory serves, in that game of follow the cop my only successful frame was on the mafia godfather.)pancakemix wrote:Now the use of the word "frame" is very important here. Yoshi's choice of that word may have been ill-advised given the ability of the Framer role. But on the other hand, that role is extremely rare. I actually can't think of a game I've played in where there was a Framer (there might have been one in freezie's HP game, but that's all I can think of). But Safari starts talking about framing in that sense. I can only interpret it in that sense of the word. He doesn't question it (i.e. "How do you know there's a framer?"). He just takes it as it is. This is the only way this could be a WIFOM. And I think this is also a fundamental blunder on Safari's part. I think he basically admitted the mafia have a framer. Which means he knows that. Which means he's mafia.
As a newcomer to mafia here you have done several small things that are tripping the scum radars of the more established players. It is hard to explain what exactly these things are, but in general, being new you just don't quite "mesh" with the other players just yet. Something about you just seems off, and the sense of things being off is used by players to detect scum by gut feeling. This often happens with new players. The problem is that it is hard to determine if the scum-tells one is sensing from a new player are because he is new, or becuase he is new and scum. Not sure how to get around this when new players come into the mafia forum. Games specifically for new players are one way to kind of break them in, but they require a certain amount of new players to work.DoomYoshi wrote:Another case against me. How did I draw attention to myself?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Anarkistsdream wrote:I am SO freaking confused right now... Hahahaha
How about this? You guys all get to vote who I vig in the night, as well. I will vig that person.
My love will either vig a second player or protect me, so get your votes out for that one.
Now, let's hammer someone and see who is right and who is LYING!?!?! This back and forth will never end.
Commander9 wrote:Unless someone counter claims, why should we kill our doc? He may be acting out and playing a bit idiotic, but we didn't kill herk in Briarsburg. Why would you suggest this?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users