Moderator: Community Team
JudahsLion wrote:wow...once again aage, edocsil, and Flow are in lock-step with eachother...
I seriously hope all the rest of the people playing are paying attention to that fact. That's the number one give-away for mafia...they stick up for eachother.
Just a message to all other players...they are starting to gang up on me since they know Ive got them figured out.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:JudahsLion wrote:wow...once again aage, edocsil, and Flow are in lock-step with eachother...
I seriously hope all the rest of the people playing are paying attention to that fact. That's the number one give-away for mafia...they stick up for eachother.
Just a message to all other players...they are starting to gang up on me since they know Ive got them figured out.
Remind me what is our justification for our lynch? Cause it isn't bandwagoning like you would desire to imply. And by the way, mafia members don't openly work together, at least not on the surface. Most players are better then that.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
edocsil wrote:JudahsLion wrote:wow...once again aage, edocsil, and Flow are in lock-step with eachother...
I seriously hope all the rest of the people playing are paying attention to that fact. That's the number one give-away for mafia...they stick up for eachother.
Just a message to all other players...they are starting to gang up on me since they know Ive got them figured out.
Remind me what is our justification for our lynch? Cause it isn't bandwagoning like you would desire to imply. And by the way, mafia members don't openly work together, at least not on the surface. Most players are better then that.
Fircoal wrote: I don't think any of those 3 would align so closely as scum.
JudahsLion wrote:Obviously i dont have a rock solid case against Flow, and day 1 lynches are hard to justify. We can take this different ways...we can assume that the quiet people are the suspicious ones (sensfan and mass miracle)....we can assume that the people defending eachother are the suspicious ones (aage, edoc, and Flow)...or we can assume that the guy who is just trying to play the game is the suspicious one (me!).
Right now I believe Aage, Edoc, and Flow are in bed together. Thats just my opinion though. Im not the only one that voted for Flow, so I dont see why I deserve to be put under the microscope by the suspicious 3. The only reason for it is that I am on to you and you want me gone.[
You are apparently eager to begin the lynching...yet you cast your vote for someone that no one else has voted for! Why wouldnt you just vote for Flow since he/she already has 6 votes so that we can, as you say, begin the lynching?!?
jeraado wrote:I was getting ready to point the finger at judahs for being keen on the lynch, but aage and edocsil have been acting very suspiciously. The focus on flow wasn't so light that it wasn't worth investigating, yet each time it has been seriously raised, both aage and edocsil have been in quick as a flash to try and shift the focus back to the person asking the questions.
FOS aage
FOS edocsil
Although I'm less certain about Flow I still think that it is at least worth further investigation, so for now I remain
FOS Flow
I agree with this:Fircoal wrote: I don't think any of those 3 would align so closely as scum.
but there's no way 3 townies would act this way. I could understand one (as lovers) but not two.
I agree there has been some sort of odd OR scummy behaviour from the 3 of them, im not sure if this worthy of a lynch tho just to find out.
What i would suggest is more pressure on flow, 1. to get more info out of him 2. to see if more reaction from Aage and Edoc.
Lets try to use the last few days wisely i dont want a townie out ive seen how easy it is to make a bad lynch.
So the only question in my mind is which of those three to vote for. I am going to vote edocsil for two reasons - 1) edocsil so far has always been the follow-up poster. Aage casts suspicion and edocsil adds the groupthink, and 2) edocsil was the one to ask for a time limit, which by itself isnt a bad idea, but for someone who is filibustering possibly a way to try and force a no-lynch? I'm pretty new to this, but it seems that no-lynch provides more benefit to the scum than it does to us
So to sum up - vote edocsil
although if we have a quorum on flow then I will change
Now lets see how long it takes the three musketeers to try and shift the focus again
kernov wrote:Sorry i messed my quoting up there ^ , heres my bit,
I agree there has been some sort of odd OR scummy behaviour from the 3 of them, im not sure if this worthy of a lynch tho just to find out.
What i would suggest is more pressure on flow, 1. to get more info out of him 2. to see if more reaction from Aage and Edoc.
Lets try to use the last few days wisely i dont want a townie out ive seen how easy it is to make a bad lynch.
aage wrote:kernov wrote:Sorry i messed my quoting up there ^ , heres my bit,
I agree there has been some sort of odd OR scummy behaviour from the 3 of them, im not sure if this worthy of a lynch tho just to find out.
What i would suggest is more pressure on flow, 1. to get more info out of him 2. to see if more reaction from Aage and Edoc.
Lets try to use the last few days wisely i dont want a townie out ive seen how easy it is to make a bad lynch.
L-2 isn't good enough for you? What the hell?
kernov wrote:aage wrote:L-2 isn't good enough for you? What the hell?
Seems we where right guys , keep the votes on flow! just because Aage is at it again im still not sure hes a bad boy.
Either that or Aage is on the stamppot again
aage wrote:... but in here some people don't seem to grasp that a person actually can be interested in something that doesn't have to do with him/her.
jeraado wrote:I was getting ready to point the finger at judahs for being keen on the lynch, but aage and edocsil have been acting very suspiciously. The focus on flow wasn't so light that it wasn't worth investigating, yet each time it has been seriously raised, both aage and edocsil have been in quick as a flash to try and shift the focus back to the person asking the questions.
So the only question in my mind is which of those three to vote for. I am going to vote edocsil for two reasons - 1) edocsil so far has always been the follow-up poster. Aage casts suspicion and edocsil adds the groupthink, and 2) edocsil was the one to ask for a time limit, which by itself isnt a bad idea, but for someone who is filibustering possibly a way to try and force a no-lynch? I'm pretty new to this, but it seems that no-lynch provides more benefit to the scum than it does to us
edocsil wrote:JudahsLion wrote:Flow520 wrote:I think most of us would rather take our time so we have better chance of actually lynching scum.
...says the mafia
..Says the mafia
Vote JudahsLion
edocsil wrote:M8 the logic was so self evident I didn't think it needed an explanation beyond a repeat of the word of judas. Why on earth would we not want to take our time and proceed with a careful lynch? Rushing ends with a dead townie, no leads D2, and dead townies in the night. Understand now why I voted for him? If he wasn't joking he may as well of held up a sign. If he was joking, he is risking his life for a laugh.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Unvote vote Judah pushing for a fast lynch is scummy in nature especially when it was really weak evidence against them to start.
edocsil wrote:aage wrote:... but in here some people don't seem to grasp that a person actually can be interested in something that doesn't have to do with him/her.
The last two lines are the most important. We have separately looked at flow's actions and Judas's actions and found one to slightly curious and the other to be scum.
JudahsLion wrote:This is the curious thing about you, which obviously Kernov and I both see...is all this "We" talk. you are subtly acknolwedging that you two are collaborationg. You three are WAY more suspicious than any one else right now.
last post on 24th Nov , in what exactly?sensfan wrote:oh boy! im in then!
JudahsLion wrote:it looks like we are still waiting for 5 people to get off their lazy keister and cast a vote.
At this point no one is really talking except about things non-mafia related, and our only "suspicious" person is Flow. If youre sitting on the fence right now, let me say that Flow has to be the first lynch becuase quite frankly the first kill is always kinda random and its the only person worthy of death at this point. Once we get the 9 votes we need, we will be able to progress to the next day where we will actually find out some useful information for once. We will see 2 people die (probably), and we may get information from a cop.
Also, if you take the word "Flow" and flip it around, it spells "Wolf". What do wolves do? They kill people. Case closed.
aage wrote:Fircoal, you of all should know. Dethy mafia also has a N0 and the mafia doesn't get a kill.
Also, let's look at this:the moderationing awesomeness wrote: 14 people have confirmed so far. Most in this thread; a few by pm. However even if you confirmed your role by pm, remember to post in here as well. With that said....
Night 0 Began!!!
If you have a night 0 action, submit it in to me. As soon as all actions are in or 24 hours have passed- whichever comes first- Day 1 will begin.
IF you have a night 0 action, it specifically says. idk but I think the mafia didn't have a pm that said "you have a n1 action. you have a n2 action. you have a n3 action." It probably said something like "you can kill at night". It might have mentioned N0; only the mafia would know.
And knowing the game, I don't think they'll tell us
jeraado wrote:We want to get as much information as possible before actually making a lynch. The odds are that a day 1 lynch will turn up a townie, but the more information we have the more likely we are going to be able to pick up on who is actually scum. Even if we don't make a wrong lynch on day 1, if we've at least picked up some leads we can consider what happens on subsequent days, whereas if we jump into the first lynch that comes along, then the chances are on day 2 we'll still not have much to go on.
Flow520 wrote:The whole idea of "the three musketeers" is just silly.
The post I made previously included quotes expressing great suspicion of Judah by Fircoal, aage, edocsil, and kernov. Add that the reasons Tails used to vote for Judah and you have a 6 person group.
What seems more scummy to me is the manner in which kernov flips and flops depending on whichever way the suspicion is blowing.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users