C9 Newbie Game- Endgame

[AceArtemis]

guess I'll vote for Simon Viviavant. with no other information to go on other than his decietful sounding name

Sorry, but all votes must be in bold for them to count, like this: Vote: Simon Viavant
This is the code for it:

Code: Select all

[b]Vote: Simon Viavant[/b]

[Hopscotcher]

Vote: Simon Viviant

[sully800]

Have any of you thought that maybe sully might be lying to us in order to avoid posting?

Well I'm back now, and free to post. But I suppose otherwise that would be a good possibility

The race went well for anyone who is interested. If you want confirmation that I wasn't lying I can post results in a couple of days.

Oh no, now I've been too defensive which means I MUST be lying I love these games, they make you so unsure of yourself.

For the record I am not mafia

[Mr. Squirrel]

Have any of you thought that maybe sully might be lying to us in order to avoid posting?

Well I'm back now, and free to post. But I suppose otherwise that would be a good possibility

The race went well for anyone who is interested. If you want confirmation that I wasn't lying I can post results in a couple of days.

Oh no, now I've been too defensive which means I MUST be lying I love these games, they make you so unsure of yourself.

For the record I am not mafia

See everyone! He admits to lying! That scum. fos: sully

And for the record:unvote. Hopscotcher is already at 2 and with only 4 needed to lynch, I wouldn't want him to be lynched because of my joke vote.

[sully800]

Tri results

show

On topic - thanks for the unvote Mr. Squirrel, there is a reason you were always my favorite woodland creature. As for who to actually lynch, its so hard on the first day. But I know the town stands the best chance when there is a lot of talking, and no quick lynches (because talking is how you gather info, lynching without info leads to a dead town).

Everyone who is not speaking: Where where you on the night that our beloved mayor died??

[e_i_pi]

Everyone who is not speaking: Where where you on the night that our beloved mayor died??

Why, I was at home playing CC of course

Vote: wcaclimbing

Looks like he's jumped on a bandwagon - dangerous type of person to have around when tempers are flared

[wcaclimbing]

Vote: wcaclimbing

Looks like he's jumped on a bandwagon - dangerous type of person to have around when tempers are flared

Seeing as I am now the only person voting for Hopscotcher (since Squirrel unvoted) and there was only one other vote for him at the time I made mine, I would hardly call my vote 'jumping on the bandwagon'.

That vote was just going off the best evidence I've seen so far. I find it suspicious when a person doesn't show up to play.

[AceArtemis]

-Vote Count-

sully800-2, (Hologram, Simon Viavant)
Hopscotcher-1, (wcaclimbing)
Simon Viavant-1, (Hopscotcher)
wcaclimbing-1, (e_i_pi)

Not Voting: sully800, Mr. Squirrel

With 7 alive, it's 4 to lynch.

[wcaclimbing]

what happens if no one gets voted out? Is there a time limit?

[Hopscotcher]

Vote: wcaclimbing

Looks like he's jumped on a bandwagon - dangerous type of person to have around when tempers are flared

Seeing as I am now the only person voting for Hopscotcher (since Squirrel unvoted) and there was only one other vote for him at the time I made mine, I would hardly call my vote 'jumping on the bandwagon'.

That vote was just going off the best evidence I've seen so far. I find it suspicious when a person doesn't show up to play.

I thought this was a tournament, lol. I didn't know it was a forum thing.

[wcaclimbing]

I thought this was a tournament, lol. I didn't know it was a forum thing.

I've made that kind of mistake before.
Good enough excuse for me.
unvote Hopscotcher

Since we don't really have any evidence to go on, wouldn't it be better to not lynch anybody today?
Cause with two mafia and five town, we'd be more likely to lynch a town person and mess things up for ourselves in the future...
What do you guys think?

[sully800]

I thought this was a tournament, lol. I didn't know it was a forum thing.

I've made that kind of mistake before.
Good enough excuse for me.
unvote Hopscotcher

Since we don't really have any evidence to go on, wouldn't it be better to not lynch anybody today?
Cause with two mafia and five town, we'd be more likely to lynch a town person and mess things up for ourselves in the future...
What do you guys think?

That's kind of true, but then we don't get much evidence either. You get info from who people voted for, and the conversations they had. If the town never lynches then all the townies get killed at night and can't defend themselves.

Then again when the town lynches with limited info they die doubly fast. Let's just keep the conversation going, then we can decide what to do as we approach our deadline (there is no hard deadline in this one by the way, read the rules)

[wcaclimbing]

Unless some better evidence comes up, I'm going to no vote. or vote no lynch. or whatever I'm supposed to say to officially not vote for anyone.

I just don't feel comfortable voting someone out with so little evidence to work with. If someone brings up something good later on, I may change my vote. But for now, I don't want to lynch when we could so easily kill a townie.

[Mr. Squirrel]

Unless some better evidence comes up, I'm going to no vote. or vote no lynch. or whatever I'm supposed to say to officially not vote for anyone.

I just don't feel comfortable voting someone out with so little evidence to work with. If someone brings up something good later on, I may change my vote. But for now, I don't want to lynch when we could so easily kill a townie.

And what will change by the second day? If we just don't lynch anyone today, day 2 will be no different than day 1. I don't see the point in not lynching. We are gonna have to eventually, otherwise the mafia will never die.

In fact, I find your opinion rather scummy...vote wca

[wcaclimbing]

if we didn't lynch today, that would prevent the likely chance of us voting out one of the town.
so then on day two we would be down only one town member, not two. That would give the town better chances, wouldn't it?

The change between day one and two would be that the mafias would kill someone. That could give us a better clue as to who they might be.

I only see benefit for the mafia if we lynched someone today. Cause that would be one less person they have to eliminate at night. Unless we get lucky and actually manage to find a mafia on day one.

[Mr. Squirrel]

wca without any sort of discussion or lynching, we will be no closer to knowing who is mafia in day 2 than we are now. I agree that a mafia's kill can give us clues as to who is actually a mafia member, but unless we have something to go by on day 1, the night kill will only hurt us because we will have one less town vote.

And, contrary to what you say, I believe a lynching can help the town even if it ends up being another townie. If we lynch a townie, we can better deduce the rest of the mafia by who defended/attacked said townie. No matter what, I believe a lynch is needed if we are to hunt down the mafia.

[e_i_pi]

Unvote: wca

I have a sneaking suspicion there's a liar amongst us

[sully800]

if we didn't lynch today, that would prevent the likely chance of us voting out one of the town.
so then on day two we would be down only one town member, not two. That would give the town better chances, wouldn't it?

The change between day one and two would be that the mafias would kill someone. That could give us a better clue as to who they might be.

I only see benefit for the mafia if we lynched someone today. Cause that would be one less person they have to eliminate at night. Unless we get lucky and actually manage to find a mafia on day one.

The real benefit of voting, is the off chance that you accuse a mafia member. You don't even need to lynch the member, you just need to vote for them with good enough reasoning. If you start to gather support and one person refuses to support it then there is your scum. But of course nothing is that simple and you can never vote for sure.

I can never decide whether no voting is good or not. It keeps the town alive twice as long, but limits the evidence that you get. (You can still gather new information, because once a townie is killed at night you can verify that they were previously telling the truth). Once again that means the town can only win by talking, giving opinions, sharing theories and such. Some once again, FOS at anyone who is not talking or at least those who are not providing substance. Which for now is all of us I guess

[wcaclimbing]

Thanks for the explanations, guys.
This'll make sense to me eventually

[Mr. Squirrel]

unvote

[AceArtemis]

what happens if no one gets voted out? Is there a time limit?

Don't worry about it right now. There's no time limit yet. When I set a deadline, you'll know.

[AceArtemis]

-Vote Count-

sully800-2, (Hologram, Simon Viavant)
Simon Viavant-1, (Hopscotcher)
No Lynch-1, (wcaclimbing)

Not Voting: sully800, Mr. Squirrel, e_i_pi

With 7 alive, it's 4 to lynch.

Simon Viavant and Hologram have not posted recently, so I will prod them if they do not post soon. I may also have to set a deadline. Carry on...

[wcaclimbing]

...and Hologram is still missing.
Does that mean he's getting kicked out, or would somebody replace him if he never shows up?

He's deadbeating out of all of his games. So its not like he's not purposely not posting in here. He hasn't been on CC since saturday...

[sully800]

Well there is two options that I see then:

• Vote for him since he is no help for the town
• Don't vote for him since we'd be pretty sure that he's not mafia (since he wouldn't be able to complete his night role without being replaced. This has the added effect that the mafia probably won't lynch him since he's not helping us.

I'd lean toward the first choice, but let's definitely give him a chance to come back

[e_i_pi]

What happens if there is a majority vote for no lynch?