Moderator: Community Team
Hologram wrote:Vote suspect because he's suspicious enough to be a lyncher. I'd watch out if I were you pmc.
Hologram wrote:well, your name does contain the word suspect, which is suspicious in and of itself. Also, I believe you crafted a "random" vote on pmc to hide the fact that you are indeed the lyncher and pmc is the lynchee, and then to top it all off you don't refute the claim that I made that you were the lyncher, therefore solidifying my stance even more.
Hologram wrote:Also, you were the first one to post that had nothing of any value to input, whether about the lyncher or what have you, so you must be trying to maintain a low profile and go with whatever the players as a whole are going with, which is a definite scumtell if I ever saw one.
Suspect101 wrote:Hologram wrote:Vote suspect because he's suspicious enough to be a lyncher. I'd watch out if I were you pmc.
you deducted all that from a single post with a random vote?
Suspect101 wrote:Hologram wrote:well, your name does contain the word suspect, which is suspicious in and of itself. Also, I believe you crafted a "random" vote on pmc to hide the fact that you are indeed the lyncher and pmc is the lynchee, and then to top it all off you don't refute the claim that I made that you were the lyncher, therefore solidifying my stance even more.Hologram wrote:Also, you were the first one to post that had nothing of any value to input, whether about the lyncher or what have you, so you must be trying to maintain a low profile and go with whatever the players as a whole are going with, which is a definite scumtell if I ever saw one.
You are trying way to hard on an obvious random vote.
unvote vote Hologram
pmchugh wrote:Suspect101 wrote:Hologram wrote:Vote suspect because he's suspicious enough to be a lyncher. I'd watch out if I were you pmc.
you deducted all that from a single post with a random vote?Suspect101 wrote:Hologram wrote:well, your name does contain the word suspect, which is suspicious in and of itself. Also, I believe you crafted a "random" vote on pmc to hide the fact that you are indeed the lyncher and pmc is the lynchee, and then to top it all off you don't refute the claim that I made that you were the lyncher, therefore solidifying my stance even more.Hologram wrote:Also, you were the first one to post that had nothing of any value to input, whether about the lyncher or what have you, so you must be trying to maintain a low profile and go with whatever the players as a whole are going with, which is a definite scumtell if I ever saw one.
You are trying way to hard on an obvious random vote.
unvote vote Hologram
People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?
saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.
Hologram wrote:saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.
Or perhaps I'm just using that argument to justify a random vote.
I mean, after all, when I use someone's name against them it becomes a little far-fetched.
Suspect101 wrote:Hologram wrote:saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.
Or perhaps I'm just using that argument to justify a random vote.
I mean, after all, when I use someone's name against them it becomes a little far-fetched.
Then you wrote two more paragraphs on why you voted for me. It was a little more than just my name, no?
Hologram wrote:Suspect101 wrote:Hologram wrote:saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.
Or perhaps I'm just using that argument to justify a random vote.
I mean, after all, when I use someone's name against them it becomes a little far-fetched.
Then you wrote two more paragraphs on why you voted for me. It was a little more than just my name, no?
Do you see me changing my vote?
I saw that as well. With absolutely nothing to go on, he defended me on a completely bullshit argument. Either I'm way too persuasive, or he's way to scummy.Suspect101 wrote:Hologram wrote:Suspect101 wrote:Hologram wrote:saboteur wrote:Vote: Hologram because I think you might be looking a bit too deeply into the game this early, as anyone could be the lyncher and placed their 'random' vote on their target.
Or perhaps I'm just using that argument to justify a random vote.
I mean, after all, when I use someone's name against them it becomes a little far-fetched.
Then you wrote two more paragraphs on why you voted for me. It was a little more than just my name, no?
Do you see me changing my vote?
I hope you don't.
Right now it looks like you are scum and PMC is covering for you.
Suspect101 wrote:pmchugh wrote:Suspect101 wrote:Hologram wrote:Vote suspect because he's suspicious enough to be a lyncher. I'd watch out if I were you pmc.
you deducted all that from a single post with a random vote?Suspect101 wrote:Hologram wrote:well, your name does contain the word suspect, which is suspicious in and of itself. Also, I believe you crafted a "random" vote on pmc to hide the fact that you are indeed the lyncher and pmc is the lynchee, and then to top it all off you don't refute the claim that I made that you were the lyncher, therefore solidifying my stance even more.Hologram wrote:Also, you were the first one to post that had nothing of any value to input, whether about the lyncher or what have you, so you must be trying to maintain a low profile and go with whatever the players as a whole are going with, which is a definite scumtell if I ever saw one.
You are trying way to hard on an obvious random vote.
unvote vote Hologram
People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?
so you don't think this a reach at all and that his deduction is justified from my random vote?
Hologram wrote:I saw that as well. With absolutely nothing to go on, he defended me on a completely bullshit argument. Either I'm way too persuasive, or he's way to scummy.Suspect wrote:I hope you don't.
Right now it looks like you are scum and PMC is covering for you.
Unvote
Your move pmc.
pmchugh wrote:
Can I ask a serious question about mafia games, why are you not alowed to defend someone without immidiately being their scum buddy? I have done this countless times and the reaction is always your his scum buddy! Do you think I'm that stupid?
Suspect101 wrote:pmchugh wrote:
Can I ask a serious question about mafia games, why are you not alowed to defend someone without immidiately being their scum buddy? I have done this countless times and the reaction is always your his scum buddy! Do you think I'm that stupid?
Becuase think about the actions you just defended. he wasn't just reaching. He pretty much claimed me as being the lyncher after a random vote. How do you deduce that from my post? You can't, which makes his actions look scummy and you defended his actions, which makes you look scummy. If you defend a person and have a legitimate reason, then you can complain, but how do you not look like a scum buddy for defending those action?
pmchugh wrote:People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?
pmchugh wrote:Suspect101 wrote:pmchugh wrote:
Can I ask a serious question about mafia games, why are you not alowed to defend someone without immidiately being their scum buddy? I have done this countless times and the reaction is always your his scum buddy! Do you think I'm that stupid?
Becuase think about the actions you just defended. he wasn't just reaching. He pretty much claimed me as being the lyncher after a random vote. How do you deduce that from my post? You can't, which makes his actions look scummy and you defended his actions, which makes you look scummy. If you defend a person and have a legitimate reason, then you can complain, but how do you not look like a scum buddy for defending those action?
Fair enough although if you read this:pmchugh wrote:People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?
I am hardly defending him, and I stand by everything I said in that post.
All random votes are open to suspcion just like any other post, I didn't say his reasons were good nor that I agreed with them; merely that you can't just say "it was random vote/post therefore it doesn't count". A more accurate defense would have mocked his reasons i.e. he said your name was one reason. Or you would have ignored it as random if you seen this to be a joke. I wasn't saying you were wrong and he was right, merely that his methods were right and yours were wrong.
Put it this way if he hadn't said that we would all be pretty quiet just now, and that is where I liked his post not on the content itself.
Hologram wrote:pmchugh wrote:Suspect101 wrote:pmchugh wrote:
Can I ask a serious question about mafia games, why are you not alowed to defend someone without immidiately being their scum buddy? I have done this countless times and the reaction is always your his scum buddy! Do you think I'm that stupid?
Becuase think about the actions you just defended. he wasn't just reaching. He pretty much claimed me as being the lyncher after a random vote. How do you deduce that from my post? You can't, which makes his actions look scummy and you defended his actions, which makes you look scummy. If you defend a person and have a legitimate reason, then you can complain, but how do you not look like a scum buddy for defending those action?
Fair enough although if you read this:pmchugh wrote:People who believe random votes aren't open to suspcion are mistaken, every post you make is. He's reaching but still you need to reach to start the game unless ani happens to be scum. Speaking of ani, where is he?
I am hardly defending him, and I stand by everything I said in that post.
All random votes are open to suspcion just like any other post, I didn't say his reasons were good nor that I agreed with them; merely that you can't just say "it was random vote/post therefore it doesn't count". A more accurate defense would have mocked his reasons i.e. he said your name was one reason. Or you would have ignored it as random if you seen this to be a joke. I wasn't saying you were wrong and he was right, merely that his methods were right and yours were wrong.
Put it this way if he hadn't said that we would all be pretty quiet just now, and that is where I liked his post not on the content itself.
Woo! See what I started? A giant gagglefuck where we have two suspicious people, myself and pmc. Now I know why I did what I did, but pmc seems to be a little too butt hurt and over-reactive to me suddenly putting suspicion on him.
My lack of vote still stands. Both of you seem to be way to butt hurt over all of this though, that's for sure.
pmchugh wrote:What does everyone else think?
Stroop wrote:pmchugh wrote:What does everyone else think?
Hologram looks the scummiest.
Yeah, maybe more from me later. A bit busy today.
Ok he was suspicious but that was a very premature hammer, why didn't you let him claim or at least put up a defense. Very poor decision IMO.Stroop wrote:Stroop wrote:pmchugh wrote:What does everyone else think?
Hologram looks the scummiest.
Yeah, maybe more from me later. A bit busy today.
Alright. Holo was reaching to accuse Suspect, but his points were in fact valid. Suspect looked like scum/lyncher to me more than Holo, especially since he was so sensitive about being called the lyncher over a random vote.
Hologram backed off as soon as someone mentioned pmc and he might be partners in crime and turns the spotlight on pmc (who doesn't even look bad at all (am I scum with pmc now?)). My money is on Holo, but #2 is surely Suspect.
vote Hologram
Users browsing this forum: No registered users