Minister Masket wrote:Confirmed
Oh this will be interesting.
Unlikely.
,
Moderator: Community Team
Minister Masket wrote:Confirmed
Oh this will be interesting.

 cena-rules
				cena-rules
			














 
		darvlay wrote:Get over it, people. It's just a crazy lookin' bear ejaculating into the waiting maw of an eager fox. Nothing more.

 mr. incrediball
				mr. incrediball
			

 baggins994
				baggins994
			
 
			 /
				/
			




 
		Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.

 strike wolf
				strike wolf
			







 
		


 Sierra_Leon
				Sierra_Leon
			



 
		

 baggins994
				baggins994
			
 
			

 Sierra_Leon
				Sierra_Leon
			



 
		 william18
				william18
			











 
		Sierra_Leon wrote:Don't go random bandwagoning please. You're going to make me vote you (baggins/william/suggs/future bandwagoners) if you keep this up.
For those of you who haven't heard my opinion on this before, here is how I think a day 1 should look:
Day 1 starts with joking and random voting. Then some discussion about how some of those random votes appear suspicious. Then some discussion about that discussion. By then some people are most likely giving out scumtells and the random voting turns to voting with (good) reason.
But what I see happening in other games and fear will happen here too is:
Day 1 starts with joking and random voting. However, all 'random' votes are directed at the same person somehow. That person will then claim way too early because he's afraid the bandwagon will keep going at the same pace.
You pick which one is best.
 
 


 suggs
				suggs
			



 
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users