FiveThreeEight wrote:How much useful information can you put out in Day 1?
This was directed at AD.
Moderator: Community Team
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
FiveThreeEight wrote:FiveThreeEight wrote:How much useful information can you put out in Day 1?
This was directed at AD.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
freezie wrote:In every mafias, you can always get informations, even by day 1. If you watch carefully, that is.
The possibility of a slip-up is always there.
And I played with you, too....You used to do only votes..No discussion..
FiveThreeEight wrote:freezie wrote:In every mafias, you can always get informations, even by day 1. If you watch carefully, that is.
The possibility of a slip-up is always there.
And I played with you, too....You used to do only votes..No discussion..
Even with the possibility of a slip-up, that doesn't mean there is one. I don't think I have played enough for AD to make this accusation.
Also, I don't see him having any epiphanies in either of the games that we're both playing.
borox0 wrote:Vote 538 because of his slip up.
freezie wrote:borox0 wrote:Vote 538 because of his slip up.
If you cna explain his slip-up in the next 12 hours, I will remove my vote from you.
Unvote
Vote: Borox
Could very well be a random day 1 vote, but again...Don't say it's not when it's one.
borox0 wrote:freezie wrote:borox0 wrote:Vote 538 because of his slip up.
If you cna explain his slip-up in the next 12 hours, I will remove my vote from you.
Unvote
Vote: Borox
Could very well be a random day 1 vote, but again...Don't say it's not when it's one.
He said that you can't get much info on day one when you can very easily get good info.
freezie wrote:borox0 wrote:freezie wrote:borox0 wrote:Vote 538 because of his slip up.
If you cna explain his slip-up in the next 12 hours, I will remove my vote from you.
Unvote
Vote: Borox
Could very well be a random day 1 vote, but again...Don't say it's not when it's one.
He said that you can't get much info on day one when you can very easily get good info.
And how does that make him mafia? A townie could easily have said the same thing..
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:freezie wrote:borox0 wrote:freezie wrote:borox0 wrote:Vote 538 because of his slip up.
If you cna explain his slip-up in the next 12 hours, I will remove my vote from you.
Unvote
Vote: Borox
Could very well be a random day 1 vote, but again...Don't say it's not when it's one.
He said that you can't get much info on day one when you can very easily get good info.
And how does that make him mafia? A townie could easily have said the same thing..
I think he falls under the catergory of missguided n00b. (I mean bor0x.)
borox0 wrote:I thought it was better than a completly random vote. Thats it. Vote for me if you finds this not good enough.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users