Okay, I just did another re-read.
Clive wrote:Can't believe the PM I just got from the mod. Makes me not want to play anymore.
Whatever, I'm Fezzik pro-town Roleblocker.
edocsil wrote:@ Clive, I will prod inactives, you were needed for the game to continue and did not bother to post. If this bothers you PM me, but do not discus it further in the thread.
Hmm, I wonder what happened behind the scenes here. Guess I will have to wait til the end of the game to find out.
Commander9 wrote:Clive wrote:Can't believe the PM I just got from the mod. Makes me not want to play anymore.
Whatever, I'm Fezzik pro-town Roleblocker.
As much as I don't like your attitude, Fezzik is an important character in the story and unless someone will counter this claim, I will consider him as Fezzik. From my quick read, he seemed harmless enough and pro-town material, so
unvote.
Commander, this does seem a bit contradictory. This post really stood out to me. Commander had been pretty active against.
Even when ga7 and anark supported clive, commander voiced his disagreement.
Then after clive claims, commander says his actions have been harmless and pro-town. However, he stated several that he thought clive putting 40k/tails at L-3 was scummy.
His reasons were:
No need to try to quick lynch sombody for inactivity when the mod says they are going to be replaced soon.
Even though its Day 1- we still want to try to get the best lynch possible
Opposing Reasons
Day 1 is completely random, odd- no leads. Its best to get the game moving and lynch someone quickly- and then later in the game, you can start building cases.
Commander stood to his point of view pretty strongly saying that what clive did was scummy. I can understand him unvoting clive by believing his claim- but not to also add- his actions were harmless and pro-town. Why go after him if his actions were harmless? Just doesn't make sense.
Aage also put a vote towards clive for similar reasons.
I believe Tails made a small case against aage- saying that this was a likely case that scum would propose to appear pro-town.
Aage did unvote clive, after he claimed. Sax threw a fake argument against clive- which leads me to believe that there is a mafia roleblocker out there.
TheSaxlad wrote:I reveal too much in mafia games. Safe to say I kmow a rolebloker but not a name, Clive is not that roleblocker.
And then commander posted this:
Commander9 wrote:Okay, you may "know" that you're town, but we don't. Furthermore, naxus does make a good point that this specific action of yours definitely was scummy. While I do understand that you're knew and I do think that most likely you are town (although that roleblock role doesn't fit with your character at all), the way you are playing this is not doing you any favours.
Commander posted that after saying clive's actions were harmless. So which one is it?
This isn't really enough to warrant a vote or even a FOS on commander, however it is something I did notice. Trying to analyze the posts to build a case- and I still don't really have one. I only have the slightly suspicious instinct against khiva, so will keep my vote on him for now.
Despite that contradiction, commander does seem pro-town. I don't think the mafia would have challenged clive that strongly- as they would have known before hand that he was town.
Sax tried to challenge clive- and we see where that got him.