Moderator: Community Team
Under normal circumstances, yes. The characters name and role is normally revealed when they are lynched, or when day begins for those killed at night.theherkman wrote:When someone dies do we find out what role they had?
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
spiesr wrote:You know, maybe ga7 took it upon himself to do some vigilante work and take out what he deemed to be a threat to the town? It doesn't have to be an attempted scum murder. Maybe it is friendly murder...TA1LGUNN3R wrote:unvote vote ga7 for attempted assassination. That's pretty scummy.
Fircoal wrote:OK GUYS!!! I HAVE AN IDEA! YOU SEE WE'RE GOING TO FIND THE MOST ANNOYING PERSON AND VOTE THEM BECAUSE THEY'RE VOTING AN ANNOYING COLOR AND PUT THE CONVERSATION ONTO THAT! SURE SOME PEOPLE LIKE FRENCHIE-CHAN WILL USE ACTUAL LOGIC BUT IT'LL BE GOOD ENOUGH THAT THE MOST OF US CAN RANDOMLY JUMP ON IT AND NAWT APPEAR SCUMMY. WE CAN EVEN DISTACT THE WHOLE CONVO ONTO COLORS SO NOTHING GETS NONE! ETS A BRILLANT PLAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111
strike wolf wrote:I don't care what reason you have for editing. You shouldn't do something like that. quote what you said, edit the part you mean to and post it with EBWOP at the end.
FloresDelMal wrote:now why would i do that? i know that france sucks, but that is not reason for want to die, specially not with the soldes comming
theherkman wrote:So I thought about it a little and its definitely stupid that skimming is a scum tell. Then would not all mafia read everything and not skim? Then you run into the whole wine in front of me thing...
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
ga7 wrote:I do find it a weird coincidence that Violet could be the one warning her AND trying to put the heat off her in the thread too. You don't do that for friends, you do that for scumbuddies.
ga7 wrote:Lol I'll try to answer to some posts of interest but dude, I don't even think I saw death miller more than once in 3 years![]()
Herk, he didn't roleclaim, he's explaining you that generally the roles are revealed upon death, with the role-based exceptions he presented.
theherkman wrote:ga7 wrote:Lol I'll try to answer to some posts of interest but dude, I don't even think I saw death miller more than once in 3 years![]()
Herk, he didn't roleclaim, he's explaining you that generally the roles are revealed upon death, with the role-based exceptions he presented.
But what if he is mafia and he is putting this idea out there so when he is investigated and comes up scum he can point back here as a defense?
ga7 wrote:Ah good thing you didn't replace Flores Mr S, she got sick and I kinda forgot to notify it... She should post tomorrow tho (that was a close one![]()
)
Will reread on the last random occurings...
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
theherkman wrote:ga7 wrote:I do find it a weird coincidence that Violet could be the one warning her AND trying to put the heat off her in the thread too. You don't do that for friends, you do that for scumbuddies.
I don't agree. I just read through some past threads and whatnot and there are roles like masons and cops who have a sheriff and doctors who can all talk to each other. Why do we think she is mafia rather than one of a set of two or three cops? 'Cause if we kill her and she is then the mafia know who to night kill (the other one) . Then wouldn't we lose two cops or doctors? Or is this not a correct assumption?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
theherkman wrote:ga7 wrote:Lol I'll try to answer to some posts of interest but dude, I don't even think I saw death miller more than once in 3 years![]()
Herk, he didn't roleclaim, he's explaining you that generally the roles are revealed upon death, with the role-based exceptions he presented.
But what if he is mafia and he is putting this idea out there so when he is investigated and comes up scum he can point back here as a defense?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
FloresDelMal wrote:the pink is annoying as hell and so is the yellow (fucking chu stop of doing that before i start to stick needles on a pikachu plushie), but the real reason she is being voted, and i think we all can agree on that, is how fishy it seems the way she was submarining just til the moment she got called on it, and then how she commented on niezsche posting but not adressing all the votes and comments directed at her, proving she was also skimming, then if you want to do some metagamming, victor hinted that is quite possible that violet is trying to cover for her scum buddy, therefor my vote stays where it is and FOS Violet
theherkman wrote:That doesn't actually sound that convincing to me...
Commander9 wrote:theherkman wrote:That doesn't actually sound that convincing to me...
Ah, so no one can have problems in real life? Gotcha.
Just for the reference, I've voted Dazey myself, but there's another reason to it. She definitely has problems in real life (you can ask any person in the FOED clan), so please at least stop flaming if you do not know about the situation the other person is in.
theherkman wrote:You know, on second thought, upon rereading this, I think that you, violet and daze are all scum. You are defending daze and saying that I am flaming because I don't buy her excuse? This may have been the biggest scum tell of this entire game.
Commander9 wrote:theherkman wrote:That doesn't actually sound that convincing to me...
Ah, so no one can have problems in real life? Gotcha.
Just for the reference, I've voted Dazey myself, but there's another reason to it. She definitely has problems in real life (you can ask any person in the FOED clan), so please at least stop flaming if you do not know about the situation the other person is in.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users