Sam, stop telling the scum your role. Or falseclaiming; whatever. I must admit, though, it is nice for someone to confirm my suspicion that gmork is the cultās killer. Despite the fact that Suspect wrote over the initial advertisement for a Neverending cult game, he reiterated it at the top of page two.
I canāt pretend that I am surprised that pmchugh is leading town in a lynch again. However, it galls me that his reasoning is sound. This demands a proper answer to the original question: what were the bandwagonās reasons.
AceArtemis wrote:pmchugh wrote:Well I think this pretty much seals the lynch, you claim a survivor and we need a lynch to gain info. If we are wrong hell we will only lose a 3rd party member who can win with mafia if we are right then we caught scum. Its win/draw and a much safer bet than anyone else IMO. I support a hammer vote.
I completely agree. Unvote, Vote: Simon Viavant You are the weakest link, goodbye.
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Vote Simon as others have stated he did have a scummy statement following Sam's and on top of that has gone lurking.
gimpyThewonder wrote:does that mean the deadline is closed or close?
if it isn't too late i'll switch my vote unvot vote simon just to get a succesful lynch and draw day 1 shenanigins to a close
Stroop wrote:Two possible deadline lynches
I'm going to go with the Simon bandwagon on this one. vote Simon
MrDizzle wrote:So you want to get rid of townies huh? unvote vote Simon
((Later)) As I said previously, I was disturbed by Simon's mere suggestion that lynching the vig might not be such a bad idea. I have seen no defense from him that changes my mind on this matter so my vote remains with Simon.
thischarmingman wrote:pmchugh wrote:Better to off someone who is a town vig, not only are you trying to work out exactly who it is you are considering killing a town member who could become useful? I say tommorow that the vig should wait and when we decide on a lynch we get him to do it, giving us two lynches.
But in the mean time this is an incredibly scummy statement, you should never lynch a townie power role espicially when you may be able to influence their descisions.
unvote vote simon
this is the most logical vote ive seen so far
Vote Simon
This creates a strong temptation to quote all I wrote last game day. Every single player used pmchughās duplicitous reconstruction of Simonās conduct. First, he exaggerated Simonās commitment to lynching the vigilante. I contested him and the objection became Simonās āsubtle tactics.ā Unfortunately, this coincided with Simonās disappearance. When Simon finally claimed, Pmchugh branded him expendably anti-town in comparison to the āinformationā it would bring. Odd to rely on his claim as reasoning to test his claim via lynch.
So, to those who agreed that a third party is less important than āinformationā from a lynch, what did you learn? That the people who voted for Simon stole a potential game day from town? Believing Simon could have told you that. Again, I must admit that Pmchugh has found bandwagon hoppers. I would vote for them myself if Pmchugh hadnāt been behind yesterdayās charade at
every junction.
I urge all good men to
vote Pmchugh.