Moderator: Community Team
derfderf34 wrote:@ga7 he alreadt avoided that question
@everyone I promise you that I am Coleman Reese favour cop and last night I investigated nag and found him talking about large sums of money I suppose since of what you have all found on my character that I am not just a straight forward cop (maybe Niave)
Natewolfman wrote:vote ace for having more posts so far than anyone! seems like the type of thing a manic joker would do
Natewolfman wrote:unvote because my vote was strictly a random vote and these days are moving too quickly to have a bunch of wasted random votes
Natewolfman wrote:this is going nowhare and fast, with the time limit coming up Vote kalishnikov he has the most votes on him right now and we must apply pressure somewhare or risk a no-lynch which (as ive been told in other games) is bad.
Natewolfman wrote:the problem is, noone looks scummy right now, and the days are so short we have to get something done, i think we only have like 5 hours left right now before we get a no-lynch and as its been explained to me (numorus times) its always better to get a civi lynch in then no lynch at all, no?
Natewolfman wrote:im also going to vote nag for making a vote without any explination? vote will stand til we get a good reason
Natewolfman wrote:unvote i have no leads and do not know whare to take thislol
Natewolfman wrote:ga7 wrote:Nate, no leads O RLY? Didn't you see the 2 posts full of info just above yours? SFOS Nate
haha, i didnt mean no leads, what i ment was, no clear answer, nag raises a good point, i just would like to hear more responces on this before my vote rests on nag
Iliad wrote:So, so ironic. Let's please not have that if he doesn't die in 24 hours I'm going to blow up the hospital thing.
Anyway I think that Nag should not claim, or at least just yet.
However one lurker and bandwagoner did catch my eye. Let's look at his track recordNatewolfman wrote:vote ace for having more posts so far than anyone! seems like the type of thing a manic joker would do
Joke voteNatewolfman wrote:unvote because my vote was strictly a random vote and these days are moving too quickly to have a bunch of wasted random votes
But notice he doesn't step in to try to discuss anything. Random votes someone, comes back several pages to unvote and goes back to lurking. Real helpful for town there.Natewolfman wrote:this is going nowhare and fast, with the time limit coming up Vote kalishnikov he has the most votes on him right now and we must apply pressure somewhare or risk a no-lynch which (as ive been told in other games) is bad.
And now he returns and bandwagons. Notice that he tries to absolve blame, if someone asks him why would a no-lynch be bad.Natewolfman wrote:the problem is, noone looks scummy right now, and the days are so short we have to get something done, i think we only have like 5 hours left right now before we get a no-lynch and as its been explained to me (numorus times) its always better to get a civi lynch in then no lynch at all, no?
Real helpful there, nate. He doesn't actually put anything to the game, but gives a bland "maybe we should do something" remark. Notice how he thinks no-one looks scummy right now.Natewolfman wrote:im also going to vote nag for making a vote without any explination? vote will stand til we get a good reason
Now this is interesting. Last day he bandwagoned on kalish, and now I saw nag and mm vote ga7 and noticed how it was suspicious. ga7 votes nag back, and look BandwagonMan is here to save the day, voting nag!Natewolfman wrote:unvote i have no leads and do not know whare to take thislol
And this post is made just after derf claims flavour cop and what nag was. Yep, nate, you were totally reading what is happening just like yesterday when you unvoted and claimed no leads.
And now the pattern emerges.
Vote someone, preferably with a few votes
Lurk
Come back to unvote, saying there is nothing to go on with
Go back to lurking
Bandwagon on anyone with a couple of votes
Make general, bland non-helpful statements about how maybe we should do something
Go back to lurking.Natewolfman wrote:ga7 wrote:Nate, no leads O RLY? Didn't you see the 2 posts full of info just above yours? SFOS Nate
haha, i didnt mean no leads, what i ment was, no clear answer, nag raises a good point, i just would like to hear more responces on this before my vote rests on nag
"Shit! Someone caught onto me! When I meant I didn't have any leads, I didn't mean I didn't have any leads. We're playing mafia, I don't say what I mean. I meant I have to follow the crowd and blend in, I have to see whether people will defend nag and I will unvote and then go back to lurking, or if a wagon forms on him and I can happily hop on and finish day"
Frankly I cannot see how this could stink of scum more. Lurking, skimming, bandwagoning, offering no discussion but just coming in to unvote, he does the lot.
derfderf34 wrote:@ga7 he alreadt avoided that question
@everyone I promise you that I am Coleman Reese favour cop and last night I investigated nag and found him talking about large sums of money I suppose since of what you have all found on my character that I am not just a straight forward cop (maybe Niave)
animorpherv1 wrote:I'm thinking will toned down the killing roles.
anyways, I find neither of the two scummy. I've seen this behavior from both of them, although, nag is a little closer.
Iliad wrote:However one lurker and bandwagoner did catch my eye. Let's look at his track record
Iliad wrote:So, so ironic. Let's please not have that if he doesn't die in 24 hours I'm going to blow up the hospital thing.
Minister Masket wrote:Iliad wrote:So, so ironic. Let's please not have that if he doesn't die in 24 hours I'm going to blow up the hospital thing.
Is this the second time that Iliad has dropped a "subtle" hint that he is The Joker?
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
Natewolfman wrote:Iliad wrote:However one lurker and bandwagoner did catch my eye. Let's look at his track record
Im just not very good at mafiaweather im scum, vig, doc, deputy, or just townie, ive tried voicing my opinion (got lynched twice doing this) I try staying quiet (got called out and lynched) I try semi-voicing my opinion like here but I honestly just dont have experience to know what Im doing and I get called out again? honestly look at my track record youll see it everywhare
I just dont see any of the clues you guys are at all, and 90% of the time these circumstantial claims lead to everyone lynching a townie. Obviously I have no clue what im doing nor how to learn better
Minister Masket wrote:Iliad wrote:So, so ironic. Let's please not have that if he doesn't die in 24 hours I'm going to blow up the hospital thing.
Is this the second time that Iliad has dropped a "subtle" hint that he is The Joker?
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
Natewolfman wrote:I think I need a tutor for online mafia![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
in any case, if i count right thats 4 against me (with 8 to lynch) anyone else wana add to the fire before im forced to make a final claim? I have nothing against anyone else, except that I can tell you that
pmc is completely innocent (as seen through night action)
that ought to help the town ga7
nagerous wrote:vote natewolfman
lynching a mod is always fun
oh... he's also acted scummy....
nagerous wrote:unvote
I didn't read it properly.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users