Moderator: Community Team
strike wolf wrote:naxus wrote:I agree with com9 here. He's around, keep the pressure up.
@ Safari, what happens at deadline?
I'm not sure why people are so eager to make the sax wagon look stronger than it is. You weren't voting the inactive who was active elsewhere. If you were you would have voted for fircoal or pancakemix both of whom had been gone for a longer period and both of whom had posted more in the interim.
I will agree that the timing of tails unvote was a bit irregular but the people trying to make this saxlad case stronger than it is are the ones I find more suspicious.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
strike wolf wrote:Yes you voted an inactive which from my experience tends to be out of character for you. Were you not the one beating up on the victor sullivan wagon in POTC mafia for being against an inactive? You've maintained silence against those on this wagon which is fine it's a perfectly ok wagon overall with traditional pressuring of an inactive. I'm only against those who seem to be trying to point out he is active which isn't really true. Also no I don't think you're trying to use it to get him lynched but I do feel you are trying to create some kind of air of protowniness by asserting that he is active and making it look like it is a bit more than a common inactive hunt. It isn't. I felt the same way about your premature cry to get a discussion going and I will back up my opinion.
TheSaxlad wrote:I'm really sorry guys. I have overstretched myself. If you want a claim I can provide that, but I think Safari has done that for me![]()
I will read up and then post a massive post for my views. I'm sorry.
Commander9 wrote:TheSaxlad wrote:I'm really sorry guys. I have overstretched myself. If you want a claim I can provide that, but I think Safari has done that for me![]()
I will read up and then post a massive post for my views. I'm sorry.
Umm... By any chance you could explain this better? I know you didn't meant Safari, so I'm assuming it's strike and from what I'm reading you two are connected? That could explain Strike's rigorousness...
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
/ wrote:I think a claim would be the most produtive thing to do at this point since there are only four days left.
in the meantime as promised for the other current votes of note (not counting comm because the vote count doesn't seem to be accurate, or it wasn't counted because it wasn't bolded.)Haggis_McMutton wrote:Vote Commander for confirming last. classic scum move that.
also FOS Andy for probably being the only one in here that joined CC before me.Talapus wrote:Vote: freezie. It's just been so long I had to make sure I remembered what it felt like. It felt goodFircoal wrote:Vote: Talapus Cause he feels better in bed
So, are you guys sticking with this? Would you like us to follow you on these cases?![]()
Or are you just fence sitting until someone else does all the work?
I'll Unvote vote tal, since of the three he's the most active (sort of.)
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Commander9 wrote:strike wolf wrote:Yes you voted an inactive which from my experience tends to be out of character for you. Were you not the one beating up on the victor sullivan wagon in POTC mafia for being against an inactive? You've maintained silence against those on this wagon which is fine it's a perfectly ok wagon overall with traditional pressuring of an inactive. I'm only against those who seem to be trying to point out he is active which isn't really true. Also no I don't think you're trying to use it to get him lynched but I do feel you are trying to create some kind of air of protowniness by asserting that he is active and making it look like it is a bit more than a common inactive hunt. It isn't. I felt the same way about your premature cry to get a discussion going and I will back up my opinion.
This is slightly different than the Sully wagon in POTC. First of all, I was the 1st one to place a serious vote and it was 2nd vote on Saxlad - he had absolutely no pressure and this hadn't moved him anywhere near towards the lynch. The only thing that it did it gave some pressure. Sully's wagon was already established and growing when I said that I won't vote him and that I don't approve that. I don't see how this is out of character for me. At all. Again, with that "protowniness" - that's pretty much your main argument (and quite ineffective too). What I do here is nothing different what I normally do, so I don't understand this. Furthermore, you also know that I always like discussions and get into those (Remember the "painful Lebowski debate") and I'm encouraging them any way that I can.TheSaxlad wrote:I'm really sorry guys. I have overstretched myself. If you want a claim I can provide that, but I think Safari has done that for me![]()
I will read up and then post a massive post for my views. I'm sorry.
Umm... By any chance you could explain this better? I know you didn't meant Safari, so I'm assuming it's strike and from what I'm reading you two are connected? That could explain Strike's rigorousness...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
safariguy5 wrote:Deadline in 2 days.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
AndyDufresne wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Deadline in 2 days.
Safari, do you have a 'time' when the official deadline is up? Like Midnight? or 6 PM Eastern? or Something?
--Andy
strike wolf wrote:Id like to know too...though at this rate I'm wondering if we'll get anything better than a no lynch.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:strike wolf wrote:Id like to know too...though at this rate I'm wondering if we'll get anything better than a no lynch.
Yea... Honestly at this point Sax needs to get in here and claim. Then at least we might be able to get a lynch.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Gilligan wrote:Back from vacation...Reading up on the 7 or so pages that happened whilst I was gone.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users