shieldgenerator7 wrote:hey, since I'm dead, can i be that replacement?
I suppose, you can replace Hank right now if you want.
Moderator: Community Team
shieldgenerator7 wrote:hey, since I'm dead, can i be that replacement?
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:Refirmed.
I would be reading up on the thread but I already did. yay.
This is just like Heaven Can Wait
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
chapcrap wrote:Craziness!
Guess I was good not to vote shield...Hmm, before he died he mentioned the BW's on him should be looked at. Streaker and evilchaos? What say you?
evilchaos wrote:Hi guys. I just replaced FloresDelMal.
After reading through the thread, I haven't found any good leads. Talapus' arrogant PR is annoying. Squirrel's is moderately funny.
I didn't find anything serious to vote on, so I'm going to go with Vote Shield. We should kill him and take his shields to fend off zombies!
evilchaos wrote:F1fth wrote:Welcome to the game, evil!
I must say that while I agree that there's not a lot to go on yet, I find your choice for a "random vote" somewhat interesting since there was a bandwagon forming on shield before you cast it. Seems a little too convenient to pass off a joke, but then again I'm as paranoid as Talapus. Just a little more charming.
Nonetheless, for the time being I'm okay with the shield wagon. His vote was rather odd as safari mentioned and since we have a lot of time and room for voting and so little info, I think a little pressure would do us well.
Unvote Vote shieldgenerator7
Telling them that you're applying pressure defeats the purpose of doing so - lol.
I had skipped over the vote count before voting for shield. No bandwagon intended. Besides, two votes as opposed to one vote on several other people isn't exactly a bandwagon forming when it takes 10 to lynch.
/ wrote:The assassin took off his costume and sprinted at full speed, while at the same time tossing his knife to skewer the man's back. he quickly catches up to the firgure only to see someone completely different than his original target. A grey haired African man looks up with pleading eyes, "Why did you do this?" he asks without moving his lips.
"I'm sorry, you probably didn't need to die yet, but now you've seen too much..." he said as he produced another dagger to cut his talented throat before making a hasty exit.
The real hired mascot's body was found later by employees.
chapcrap wrote:Although, I kind of want to bandwagon onto Shield, talapus just seems like he should be lynched. I think he's trying to throw out disguise by talking so much and being nuts (not that far from ordinary).
unvote vote talapus
Talapus wrote:NUTS! You offend me sir. You are not fit to breath the same air I breath nor walk the same places I have been. You don't know me, where I come from, what I've dealt with in my life. How dare you drag my sanity through the mud. How dare you even use my name in a sentence and utter it out loud. For shame sir, FOR SHAME!
Now, as for talking lots, thats untruthful as I've posted once today and haven't spoken since Tuesday before that post. So those types of infamatory comments are completely beneath even you sir. Secondly, since my post on Tuesday you've brought us such wonderful content posts such as:
1) Someone taking you up on Mr. Squirrels nuts bet
2) A joke post about shrimp on the barby
2) A comparison between this and LOST
4) And now, this dreck with outright fabrications!
As for "disguise", well again, you don't know me sir. I am proud of who I am and how I got to be where I am. You however have no common decency for your fellow man though as you would take my life accomplishments and even character and rake them through the mud. I'm done reading your Dreck. I would vote you for inflamatory comments and not being worth the very oxygen you breath. However your desire to hop on a bandwagon speaks even more to your character then me confronting your dribble and I think other more decent men then yourself will notice that and cast votes your way. I may not wish to associate with the likes of you sir, however I don't wish you nor others here harm or ill will. Unless of course you're that bloody bellman who promised to retreive me a New York Times. That young man had better be ready to pack as waiting for more then 10 minutes is unacceptable. Who runs this place?
chapcrap wrote:evilchaos wrote:So what do we know about Tal's PR and role? He is arrogant and said things about Russia. He appears to be privileged (i.e. wealthy, politically powerful, etc.). He claims he worked somehow to get his position of power (wasn't from inheritence; "I am proud of who I am and how I got to be where I am").
Are you Soviet Premeir Joseph Stalin?
Not sure if he is Stalin or not, but Stalin seems kinda scummy to me. Look at that mustache.
Talapus wrote:Well, it certainly didn't give us much to go on and it wasn't very helpful for any of us. Both him and Chapcrap seem to have the same style of taking up space, emitting hot air, and adding no real substance.
Oh, what is this. WHAT IS THIS! A GREEN M & M? GREEEEN?!?! My rider specifically states no green M & M's in the candy bar. Are you stupid? Can't you read? Are you color blind? But, it doesn't matter. No excuse is good enough for this. You are a disgrace and disgust me. Get out of my site and pack your bags. I'll have you fired before you hit the front desk.
For now though I will vote Chapcrap for openly admitting to want to bandwagon without any reason. Day one or not, that isn't really the best idea.
Unvote(If Needed)
Vote :Chapcrap
chapcrap wrote:While I am new to this on CC (as Fir stated), I have played before. I wasn't trying to bandwagon just to do it. I felt like he was trying to change focus, just as safari stated. However, I didn't vote for him (shield) yet because I wasn't sure. And as far as bandwagonning goes, evilchaos is right, why would I even say that I was thinking about jumping on shield if I was scum? I would just back up the argument and hop on.
Tal, as far as taking up space and not adding substance, have you been reading your own posts? I know you're trying to play out your role, but that's all your posts have been until now. That's what my posts earlier were too, playing a role. All you did was say exactly what you have been doing and try to say that I was doing it worse than you. My vote stays on Tal for now, but I have a FOS pointed right at shield. I've got my eyes on both of you.
chapcrap wrote:Agreed that shield isn't overly suspicious. Neither is Tal for that matter. However, for my money I'd be betting on one of them. There isn't a lot to go on yet.
Aside: I do like Tal playing out his roles.
chapcrap wrote:Craziness!
Guess I was good not to vote shield...Hmm, before he died he mentioned the BW's on him should be looked at. Streaker and evilchaos? What say you?
chapcrap wrote:I posted a little hastily and the death scene threw me. After reflecting:
I still have no idea. I don't think that evil or Streaker would necessarily be bad at all. I actually would think more along the lines that they were townies because of the way things went down. Perhaps our gaze should be directed at someone shield went after (not sure who he's gone after, joke or otherwise) and/or someone who has been quiet in the thread.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
Talapus wrote:Ok, really note sure what is going on here, my internet must be acting up as I've now posted my thoughts three times in this thread and they aren't actually showing up. So forgive me if you see lots of posts that look similar. I will try this once again and then attempt a reset on my end.
Why on Earth would someone want to target me? I understand many of you are envious and probably dream every night of going to sleep and waking up looking, acting and living just a bit more like me. However, if there is a god, he would turn you down as he as perfected the perfect individual already......
I really don't understand however how a town member appears to have come after me so hard without even an investigation first. As I stated before I have nothing to hide and am town myself, so what motive is there tp day kill me before someone has even had a chance to check. Also I have never played with a sextuple voter, but is it possible that with his vote on me(I assume because he tried to kill me) that he saw 5 other versions of him all wanting me dead as well and somehow killed one of those and thus died himself?
Finally, what is the signifigance with the god mascot costume? Is anthoer player here missing his? Because it sounded he may have taken the costume from someone. All around I don't really understand at the moment as as I said need to reset this internet because it's upsetting and frustrating me to no end at the moment. So I will return to you all later after a stiff scotch and some verbal degrading of the staff, which always seems to clear my head and calm my nerves.
evilchaos wrote:I don't exactly know why anyone would waste a day kill on Tal. He doesn't sound like a cop or doctor, if the killer was anti-town. He doesn't seem scummy, if the killer was pro-town. It's rather confusing. I'm more concerned with chap's response and general behavior than the day scene itself.
As for Chap's points, I will address them in the order presented.
1) You said that, but then kept your vote on Tal and basically FOS'd Shield. Your actions speak louder than words.
2) He's playing a role, but he also posts with purpose. Every post he has made has served a purpose and brought about some type of discussion (after the joke votes anyway). Yours have not.
3) It's fine to joke; I'm a fan of humor. It isn't fine to do nothing but joke or post fluff.
4) An FOS is one step down from a vote. It's basically saying that you either are very close to voting for him or would vote for him, but you have another scummy person who you've already placed a vote on. FOSing is like voting in the sense that you should have some reason behind it. You did not.
5) You mean you were playing your role, just like you criticized Tal for doing? There is a bit of a double standard here. Also, it doesn't really matter how you phrased it. Your intent was to throw suspicion on Tal and Shield. It doesn't matter whether or not you phrased it to include your role.
6) This is highly WIFOM.
7) I'm not convinced.
safariguy5 wrote:Commander9 wrote:safariguy5 wrote:For being such a prolific poster, he's gone cold for several pages now. Nothing of substance yet, but we're firmly out of the jokevote stage and his jokevote came just as tal was trying to transition to a serious discussion. See, if he had posted a good reason for voting tal or even a good reason for voting anyone, I wouldn't have said anything. But that vote was clearly a joke and aimed at the guy looking for things to talk about.
I'm assuming that was a reference to me. First of all, as you may now from other games (in which you are playing), I've been gone for a bit and I've just finished re-reading and didn't post anything up to this point. Second of all, you know that it was not a joke vote - it doesn't look anything like it. Good try, but it won't work.
No, I actually was talking about my justification for voting shield.
shield followed the Tal post about rereading the thread with a jokevote based on tal's love of cannibalism when we were joking around about zombies. And I meant shield posts a lot on the forums so for him to not post in here for a while is a bit odd.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:.
Tal, my good friend, your PR playing is hilarious. However, you are quite annoying. I wouldn't mind lynching you, though I would go for that $20 for getting you that extra pillow.
safariguy5 wrote:I really think that it was some sort of SKer that went after you with a DK, no reasonable townie would use a basically random DK on someone during Day 1.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
Talapus wrote:Ok, evil and chaos are going head to head and I need to reread through the arguments when I get some time later tonight. RL is calling so it may be a few hours. I would however like to put this out there and hope others agree. But, with a player in this game who gets 6 votes, it means there could be someone else with that ability. Scum or not, it doesn't matter because it is a serious power in this game. So, from this point on I think we all need to be careful with bandwagons and placing any more then 2 votes on a person at a time. Not paranoid so much, as I am concerned with someone else out there like that. They make the potential for an early hammer with no claim and start of early night very real at this point.
Also, do not fret about the hysterical weeping coming from the back stairwell. Some incompetent ex-staff member dared to question my earlier requests for how I want my mini bar stocked and set up daily. Not only will she never make that mistake again but I believe she will question whether or not she should even breed and plaguu the rest of us with her offspring. Which is how it should be. Incompetent, unworthy people should not be allowed to procreate and burden the rest of high society. Truly, they have no shame.
chapcrap wrote:evilchaos wrote:I don't exactly know why anyone would waste a day kill on Tal. He doesn't sound like a cop or doctor, if the killer was anti-town. He doesn't seem scummy, if the killer was pro-town. It's rather confusing. I'm more concerned with chap's response and general behavior than the day scene itself.
As for Chap's points, I will address them in the order presented.
1) You said that, but then kept your vote on Tal and basically FOS'd Shield. Your actions speak louder than words.
2) He's playing a role, but he also posts with purpose. Every post he has made has served a purpose and brought about some type of discussion (after the joke votes anyway). Yours have not.
3) It's fine to joke; I'm a fan of humor. It isn't fine to do nothing but joke or post fluff.
4) An FOS is one step down from a vote. It's basically saying that you either are very close to voting for him or would vote for him, but you have another scummy person who you've already placed a vote on. FOSing is like voting in the sense that you should have some reason behind it. You did not.
5) You mean you were playing your role, just like you criticized Tal for doing? There is a bit of a double standard here. Also, it doesn't really matter how you phrased it. Your intent was to throw suspicion on Tal and Shield. It doesn't matter whether or not you phrased it to include your role.
6) This is highly WIFOM.
7) I'm not convinced.
Don't try to say that every one of Tal's posts have served a purpose, because they all haven't. As for your rebuttal to my number 1, I didn't realize an FoS was such a big deal. I have no idea what WIFOM is supposed to mean. I never criticized Tal for playing his role. I actually said I liked that he played it.
It seems like all of your posts against me are ridiculous. unvote
evilchaos wrote:
@Everyone: What do you think of that day scene? I personally believe the target was Tal, but it could easily be interpreted several different ways. What are possible motives for someone to target Shield? What are possible motives for someone to target Tal?
shieldgenerator7 wrote:Whathium?!
Highly suspicious... I thought it was going to be Tal. oh well
Well anyway, good game. Go Town! (or that is, Resort Guests and Staff)
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
safariguy5 wrote:While it might be a stretch to say that EVERY talapus post has been significant, I do think he's been more helpful or "townish" than half the people in this game. And there's no good way to logic out of a WIFOM there chap, chaos does bring up a good point about that.
As far as using FOS, I usually use it to show multiple suspicious people. For instance, if 3 different people bandwagonned, then I would probably vote one of them and FOS the other two. It makes no sense to FOS someone and then vote for someone else who you never mentioned in the case.
I think that the target was Tal, but I really doubt a possible day busdriver. It could be he's untargetable or bulletproof, but I have no way of knowing what is true. Not sure what a ventriloquist does, could have something to do with the death.
evilchaos wrote:chapcrap wrote:evilchaos wrote:I don't exactly know why anyone would waste a day kill on Tal. He doesn't sound like a cop or doctor, if the killer was anti-town. He doesn't seem scummy, if the killer was pro-town. It's rather confusing. I'm more concerned with chap's response and general behavior than the day scene itself.
As for Chap's points, I will address them in the order presented.
1) You said that, but then kept your vote on Tal and basically FOS'd Shield. Your actions speak louder than words.
2) He's playing a role, but he also posts with purpose. Every post he has made has served a purpose and brought about some type of discussion (after the joke votes anyway). Yours have not.
3) It's fine to joke; I'm a fan of humor. It isn't fine to do nothing but joke or post fluff.
4) An FOS is one step down from a vote. It's basically saying that you either are very close to voting for him or would vote for him, but you have another scummy person who you've already placed a vote on. FOSing is like voting in the sense that you should have some reason behind it. You did not.
5) You mean you were playing your role, just like you criticized Tal for doing? There is a bit of a double standard here. Also, it doesn't really matter how you phrased it. Your intent was to throw suspicion on Tal and Shield. It doesn't matter whether or not you phrased it to include your role.
6) This is highly WIFOM.
7) I'm not convinced.
Don't try to say that every one of Tal's posts have served a purpose, because they all haven't. As for your rebuttal to my number 1, I didn't realize an FoS was such a big deal. I have no idea what WIFOM is supposed to mean. I never criticized Tal for playing his role. I actually said I liked that he played it.
It seems like all of your posts against me are ridiculous. unvote
Tal's posts have all contained SOME type of content (whether it be his opinion on someone, his defense against something, speculation about the setup of the game, etc.) after we left the random voting stage. WIFOM refuses to circular logic. Your sixth point stated that you wouldn't target Shield if you had FoS on him because this would make you suspicious. Players know this, so maybe scum would purposefully attack the one they're FoSing because they could make just the argument you did. But players also know this so...
It's basically logic that never resolves itself. It isn't a good defense.
As for never criticizing Tal, you stated, and I quote, "I think he's trying to throw out disguise by talking so much" I assumed this referred to his PR, as that is the majority of the fluff in his posts. You later stated that you enjoyed it, this is true, but it remained the original reason you voted for him (a vote which you never removed).
@Everyone: What do you think of that day scene? I personally believe the target was Tal, but it could easily be interpreted several different ways. What are possible motives for someone to target Shield? What are possible motives for someone to target Tal?
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users