VioIet wrote:I feel that some people have been a bit too hard on anark. He gave Victor 24 hours to claim. Also ,Victor didn't provide any sort of defense when he posted. This is pretty much a sign that he is not going to.
I think if some people were really so concerned with sully accumulating too many votes; they would have unvoted to ensure that he wasn't hammered before he claimed.
All of those who have a vote on Victor at the moment are almost, or just as much to blame as Anark. I don't see anyone rushing to unvote Sully to prevent someone from hammering him. If edoc's claim is true- then certainly there are scum on Victor's wagon- probably the earlier votes. Then how convenient to just wait for someone to hammer, as long as it isn't you. And then you can conveniently use it as an argument to accuse them.
Just trying to think outside the box a bit for this one; i think this is definitely plausible.
Yes, this could be true, but it's all based on pure speculation. As far as Sully goes, when nark "hammered", he was L-2, which is good enough for someone to provide claim, but Nark thought it was L-1 and he tried to hammer. He's a good player and he knows better - I don't see any excuses why he'd do that, I'm sorry.
While your suggestion is definitely possible and I wouldn't be surprised to see mafia in that BW, this is all based on speculation. But it could also be just as good of speculation to say that mafia could stay out of that BW, try to defend Sully and then when he was lynched and turned up town, used that as an argument to base their innocence. I do like your idea, but I'm not going to shift my vote just because of speculation...
We have a fact that Nark thought that he was hammering a person who still hadn't claimed and whatever you say, I will always say that's scummy. I'm not defending Sully - what he has done is very scummy and him not defending himself only makes it worse, but we can have a cop or a tracker to work with him.