Roll Mafia I (4/10) *GAME OVER or Day 4* SKOFFIN MVP!

[nagerous]

My 39 phds say we should lynch / for scumarining.. this day phase has gone on for far too long so I don't blame ga7 for pushing for lynches to a certain degree.

/ has been playing it very cool however, rarely adding any comments, rarely getting involved in any of the arguments and debates. In my opinion the 40 phd must be hung!

[aage]

My 39 phds say we should lynch / for scumarining.. this day phase has gone on for far too long so I don't blame ga7 for pushing for lynches to a certain degree.

/ has been playing it very cool however, rarely adding any comments, rarely getting involved in any of the arguments and debates. In my opinion the 40 phd must be hung!

My 41 phd´s tell me this is odd. Bandwagon a doesnt work, okay lets try bandwagon b, oh that doesnt work either lets do bandwagon c. Er..?

[nagerous]

My 39 phds say we should lynch / for scumarining.. this day phase has gone on for far too long so I don't blame ga7 for pushing for lynches to a certain degree.

/ has been playing it very cool however, rarely adding any comments, rarely getting involved in any of the arguments and debates. In my opinion the 40 phd must be hung!

My 41 phd´s tell me this is odd. Bandwagon a doesnt work, okay lets try bandwagon b, oh that doesnt work either lets do bandwagon c. Er..?

Well my 39 phds would like to point that the initial bandwagon on A (xuereb ) did not work because he was lynched, as for B, Victor I have not been convinced by any of the arguments made against him and I don't feel that there is a conclusive evidence. You have played very pushy towards me and this has made me somewhat suspicious but I still am on the mindset that your ultimate aim is to lynch me so I am not too concerned about you and am not convinced you are scum. / on the other hand his voting has seemed sporadic to me, firstly bandwagoning me on your 'evidence' and secondly bandwagoning victor. I am also not convinced by the case against ga7 who I believe is being pushy to a certain degree out of a certain frustration with the slowness of the game rather than anything more untoward.

His most recent post, was one that particularly bothered me, rather than laying out any form of substance into the game himself he instead provides us all with a very handy vote count - playing the classic role of 'useful townie' the scum he merges into the town trying to help us all along with the game. I would suggest that he has also refrained from bandwagoning ga7 due to the fact that he is worried about the potential scumminess of the third vote and instead is sitting tight maybe waiting to strike a hammer on someone - giving his faction (the scum one) a handy advantage?

[aage]

My 39 phds say we should lynch / for scumarining.. this day phase has gone on for far too long so I don't blame ga7 for pushing for lynches to a certain degree.

/ has been playing it very cool however, rarely adding any comments, rarely getting involved in any of the arguments and debates. In my opinion the 40 phd must be hung!

My 41 phd´s once again tell me this is odd. Bandwagon a doesnt work, okay lets try bandwagon b, oh that doesnt work either lets do bandwagon c. Er..?

Well my 39 phds would like to point that the initial bandwagon on A (xuereb ) did not work because he was lynched replaced, as for B, Victor I have not been convinced by any of the arguments made against him not that he gave any but i know what you mean and I don't feel that there is a conclusive evidence. You have played very pushy towards me and this has made me somewhat suspicious but I still am on the mindset that your ultimate aim is to lynch me so I am not too concerned about you and am not convinced you are scum. / on the other hand his voting has seemed sporadic to me, firstly bandwagoning me on your 'evidence' and secondly bandwagoning victor. I am also not convinced by the case against ga7 who I believe is being pushy to a certain degree out of a certain frustration with the slowness of the game rather than anything more untoward.

His most recent post, was one that particularly bothered me, rather than laying out any form of substance into the game himself he instead provides us all with a very handy vote count - playing the classic role of 'useful townie' the scum he merges into the town trying to help us all along with the game. I would suggest that he has also refrained from bandwagoning ga7 due to the fact that he is worried about the potential scumminess of the third vote and instead is sitting tight maybe waiting to strike a hammer on someone - giving his faction (the scum one) a handy advantage? Neat theory but how's this? We lynch Victor.

Instead of the "I am annoying and post crap"-victor you go with this (slightly farfetched, but you have a point) theory? I don't really see why.

[aage]

My 39 phds say we should lynch / for scumarining.. this day phase has gone on for far too long so I don't blame ga7 for pushing for lynches to a certain degree.

/ has been playing it very cool however, rarely adding any comments, rarely getting involved in any of the arguments and debates. In my opinion the 40 phd must be hung!

My 41 phd´s once again tell me this is odd. Bandwagon a doesnt work, okay lets try bandwagon b, oh that doesnt work either lets do bandwagon c. Er..?

Well my 39 phds would like to point that the initial bandwagon on A (xuereb ) did not work because he was lynched replaced, as for B, Victor I have not been convinced by any of the arguments made against him not that he gave any but i know what you mean and I don't feel that there is a conclusive evidence. You have played very pushy towards me and this has made me somewhat suspicious but I still am on the mindset that your ultimate aim is to lynch me so I am not too concerned about you and am not convinced you are scum. / on the other hand his voting has seemed sporadic to me, firstly bandwagoning me on your 'evidence' and secondly bandwagoning victor. I am also not convinced by the case against ga7 who I believe is being pushy to a certain degree out of a certain frustration with the slowness of the game rather than anything more untoward.

His most recent post, was one that particularly bothered me, rather than laying out any form of substance into the game himself he instead provides us all with a very handy vote count - playing the classic role of 'useful townie' the scum he merges into the town trying to help us all along with the game. I would suggest that he has also refrained from bandwagoning ga7 due to the fact that he is worried about the potential scumminess of the third vote and instead is sitting tight maybe waiting to strike a hammer on someone - giving his faction (the scum one) a handy advantage? Neat theory but how's this? We lynch Victor.

Instead of the "I am annoying and post crap"-victor you go with this (slightly farfetched, but you have a point) theory? I don't really see why.

Apparently bold print isn't distinguishable in a quote.

[/]

bandwagoning me on your 'evidence' /quote]
hmm...? I don't recall mentioning aage's evidence, I voted you because you seemingly gained an extra phd overnight equaling my own 40, I immediately unvoted when it was apparently not the case, hardly an attempt at getting you lynched now was it?

secondly bandwagoning victor.

I suppose you really are skimming, can you point out at which point I "bandwagoned" victor? there was no vote, nor any case on him until I called him out for joke voting right after a deadline announcement, you could say I started a bandwagon on him, in the sense that such is what happens whenever town makes a legitimate effort to catch scum, we vote so that we may lynch the scummiest person, something you apparently have had no need for.

Want a vote there vote / 39phds happy - laying low.

you yourself admit to "laying low" in other words, your game-plan consists of not picking any side and hoping town devours itself, gee who else does that? oh right, the mafia, who already knows they gain no benefit to their credentials by either catching scum (their own team) or lynching town (being caught in a bandwagon)

my votes may be "sporadic" as you say, but that is simply because there are a limited amount of scum, and I am fairly confident I have caught one in each of today's votes, you who pick no side but "omgus don't lynch me!" and victor, who puts no effort even in crisis. scum is the only side that benifits in a no lynch, and both of your motives conclude you had no intent of finishing anything near the deadline.

if you want to hear a claim however, it seems I have been doing it from my first post, I am of course the doc with 40 PHDs, a role that has always been town in a fircoal game, if I was scum it would pretty much be a game-breaker from the start since it is apparently fairly well known in fir games.

The reason for my giving a vote count, was in fact to call out the non-contributors and I feel it has worked out quite well!

unvote vote nag

[/]

bandwagoning me on your 'evidence'

hmm...? I don't recall mentioning aage's evidence, I voted you because you seemingly gained an extra phd overnight equaling my own 40, I immediately unvoted when it was apparently not the case, hardly an attempt at getting you lynched now was it?

secondly bandwagoning victor.

I suppose you really are skimming, can you point out at which point I "bandwagoned" victor? there was no vote, nor any case on him until I called him out for joke voting right after a deadline announcement, you could say I started a bandwagon on him, in the sense that such is what happens whenever town makes a legitimate effort to catch scum, we vote so that we may lynch the scummiest person, something you apparently have had no need for.

Want a vote there vote / 39phds happy - laying low.

you yourself admit to "laying low" in other words, your game-plan consists of not picking any side and hoping town devours itself, gee who else does that? oh right, the mafia, who already knows they gain no benefit to their credentials by either catching scum (their own team) or lynching town (being caught in a bandwagon)

my votes may be "sporadic" as you say, but that is simply because there are a limited amount of scum, and I am fairly confident I have caught one in each of today's votes, you who pick no side but "omgus don't lynch me!" and victor, who puts no effort even in crisis. scum is the only side that benifits in a no lynch, and both of your motives conclude you had no intent of finishing anything near the deadline.

if you want to hear a claim however, it seems I have been doing it from my first post, I am of course the doc with 40 PHDs, a role that has always been town in a fircoal game, if I was scum it would pretty much be a game-breaker from the start since it is apparently fairly well known in fir games.

The reason for my giving a vote count, was in fact to call out the non-contributors and I feel it has worked out quite well!

unvote vote nag

EBWOP, messed up a bracket

[pancakemix]

1. Even if Victor's not a jester and it's just the way he acts, why should that draw any interest in its own right? Sure it's annoying, but it's not worth wasting time over.

2. Based on his own justifications, I feel that all of ga7's actions are within the bounds of reason. Thus, he is not worth voting.

3. / makes some good points regarding nag, but I don't like the way he tries to use his role to put himself above reproach.

[nagerous]

39 PHDS apologies if you missed understand me, I am describing you as laying low and that is the reason for my vote, that is just a very messed up sentence.

I don't believe you at all also about the doctor claim - safari was a doctor and he is dead, what are the odds of a 2nd doctor in this game - very low in my opinion.

Exactly a 40 PHD guy if it has always been town what are the odds that fircoal would make it scum for a change especially with a game with so many characters with PHDS, I don't see the point of having a supposed role who is cleared from the outset like you are trying to suggest there is - that is very scummy.

Finally, you finish off responding to my actions with an OMGUS vote - very classy.

[pancakemix]

1. Even if Victor's not a jester and it's just the way he acts, why should that draw any interest in its own right? Sure it's annoying, but it's not worth wasting time over.

2. Based on his own justifications, I feel that all of ga7's actions are within the bounds of reason. Thus, he is not worth voting.

3. / makes some good points regarding nag, but I don't like the way he tries to use his role to put himself above reproach.

I have 1 PhD.

EBWOP.

1 PhD.

[/]

I don't believe you at all also about the doctor claim - safari was a doctor and he is dead, what are the odds of a 2nd doctor in this game - very low in my opinion.

my 40 PHDs take an interest in the nature of your 39 PHDs in this case, My role says I am the doc with 40 PHDs, safari's said he was the doc with 0, if AAge can confirm he is the "doctor with 41 PHDs" this will prove undeniably you are not the "doctor with 39 PHDs" the break in the theme's chain, and almost without a doubt scum.
Aage?

[nagerous]

I don't believe you at all also about the doctor claim - safari was a doctor and he is dead, what are the odds of a 2nd doctor in this game - very low in my opinion.

my 40 PHDs take an interest in the nature of your 39 PHDs in this case, My role says I am the doc with 40 PHDs, safari's said he was the doc with 0, if AAge can confirm he is the "doctor with 41 PHDs" this will prove undeniably you are not the "doctor with 39 PHDs" the break in the theme's chain, and almost without a doubt scum.
Aage?

I've never claimed to be a medical doctor of 39 phds, but neat trying to force others to complain when you're in a pickle yourself. if you're also so obviously an obvious doctor then why were you not NKed? who did you protect last night - questions, questions..

[nagerous]

I see you're teaming with aage again though - why not ask pancakemix or flores as they both have PRs.

39 PhDs and signing out..

[ga7]

Yeah I doubt Flores will be able to play this one since she's travelling. So would be better to replace her.
I find any role-based speculations a bit silly in this game, it does strike me as weird that Nag would not be a doc despite his many phds though. Hell, I figured in this game even scum could be docs
"if you're also so obviously an obvious doctor then why were you not NKed?" Sorry too lazy to do a proper quote, wtf seriously? The guy just claimed doc like probably most of us could, do you think scum could see the future and therefore would have chosen not to kill the claimed doc night 1?
I'm on the fence as I'm curious to hear about /'s action since he felt the need to claim out of nowhere, but if he's a classic 40 phd doc it'd be useful info for scum. I think since we have so little it could be useful to the town too though...
I'm a bit more inclined to vote Nag atm to check potential links, I still find Victor the scummiest but I feel we're finally getting somewhere.

[aage]

I don't believe you at all also about the doctor claim - safari was a doctor and he is dead, what are the odds of a 2nd doctor in this game - very low in my opinion.

my 40 PHDs take an interest in the nature of your 39 PHDs in this case, My role says I am the doc with 40 PHDs, safari's said he was the doc with 0, if AAge can confirm he is the "doctor with 41 PHDs" this will prove undeniably you are not the "doctor with 39 PHDs" the break in the theme's chain, and almost without a doubt scum.
Aage?

I've never claimed to be a medical doctor of 39 phds, but neat trying to force others to complain when you're in a pickle yourself. if you're also so obviously an obvious doctor then why were you not NKed? who did you protect last night - questions, questions..

If you're not a doctor then what do your phd's do?

[aage]

I don't believe you at all also about the doctor claim - safari was a doctor and he is dead, what are the odds of a 2nd doctor in this game - very low in my opinion.

my 40 PHDs take an interest in the nature of your 39 PHDs in this case, My role says I am the doc with 40 PHDs, safari's said he was the doc with 0, if AAge can confirm he is the "doctor with 41 PHDs" this will prove undeniably you are not the "doctor with 39 PHDs" the break in the theme's chain, and almost without a doubt scum.
Aage?

I've never claimed to be a medical doctor of 39 phds, but neat trying to force others to complain when you're in a pickle yourself. if you're also so obviously an obvious doctor then why were you not NKed? who did you protect last night - questions, questions..

If you're not a doctor (like me since im a doc with 41 phds) then what do your phd's do?

ebwop. Darned pr's.

[nagerous]

39 phds trying to be forced into a claim? I'll only claim when I feel it is absolutely necessary.

[/]

I've never claimed to be a medical doctor of 39 phds, but neat trying to force others to complain when you're in a pickle yourself. if you're also so obviously an obvious doctor then why were you not NKed? who did you protect last night - questions, questions..

Well, I don't suppose I can speak for scum, (unless I invoke my PHD of criminal psychology first, because ya-know I totally have 40 PHDs) but if I had a kill I would assume the same conclusion as GA, there are so many docs with PRs in this game that the obvious docs with PRs shouldn't be targeted since they will likely protect each other.

I'm on the fence as I'm curious to hear about /'s action since he felt the need to claim out of nowhere, but if he's a classic 40 phd doc it'd be useful info for scum. I think since we have so little it could be useful to the town too though...
I'm a bit more inclined to vote Nag atm to check potential links, I still find Victor the scummiest but I feel we're finally getting somewhere.

I believe it is the classic 40 PHD role, for substantial proof of this, look at TWO's role, "kicker" it pretty much only makes sense with a 40 PHD doc.... Thus I feel I perhaps shouldn't state my previous action, as even in the following nights it may prevent deaths.

If you're not a doctor (like me since im a doc with 41 phds) then what do your phd's do?

[/quote]and we confirm the flavor in the PR... it is fairly clear that, at the very least in role flavor, nag should be called "the doc with 39 PHDs" if he were town, even Flores hinted at being a "doc" earlier, what it means is up to speculation, but it still is clearly part of the theme's flavor. Sorry to echo this, but once again I say

I am of course the doc with 40 PHDs

I don't believe you at all also about the doctor claim - safari was a doctor and he is dead, what are the odds of a 2nd doctor in this game - very low in my opinion.

I've never claimed to be a medical doctor of 39 phds,

hmhmmhm, nag makes an attempt to change from "there is no other doc" to "my flavor is probably a doc, but not medical" if it were actually in his flavor like the rest of us, but he wasn't a "doctor doc" he would have logically assumed I had meant the same thing when I said "doc", but since he clearly said he doesn't believe there would be any other doc in game, it means he, for some reason has a PR, but has nothing to do with the theme of doctors and doctorates, he is likely a scum who has stolen them as his flavor.

[aage]

41 phds wanted to ask this before but what exactly is a kicker?

[ga7]

Kicker kills people who have extra lives.
On one hand I still don't think it's very solid to rely on the flavor, on another I'm really curious now. Let's see what Nag finds "absolutely necessary".

Vote Nagu-chan <3

[nagerous]

unvote vote nagerous

39 phd style

[/]

lynch -2...... is no one else really going to vote?
can we have some prods please?

[pancakemix]

Vote nag because nag has clearly just completely flown off the handle. In addition, my earlier discussion with aage has mostly cleared him in my mind and thus I find it doubtful that he would be a lyncher at this point.

I have 1 PhD.

[TA1LGUNN3R]

I'll have to agree. I think ga7 has said enough to clear himself for now, and nag isn't making sense. If he wants to be lynched, then let's give it to him.

vote nag

-Tails

[nagerous]

you dumbfuck doctors lynched the pope! xD