The reason I was "shocked" at Kwanton's supposed hammer vote was because he had said back when this lynch was basically just a joke that he wanted to put the hammer vote on. And after the claim he still did it, with a sort of joking smile. I assumed he did this, not because he didn't believe the roleclaim, but because he wanted to hammer like he said before.
cmckinney wrote:I don't know why you guys are saying she shouldn't have claimed. After all, she was a Lynch -1, and Kwanton was planning on putting the hammer on. I'm not sure how you wouldn't have claimed in that situation, and after that; Kwanton goes in and hammers anyway.
That being said, I think that her roleclaim is definitely suspicious. I agree to that it sounds like it was just made up right on the spot, but I'm just not sure if I should vote her or not.
Now here I am on the fence about voting her. Her simple claim sounded suspicious, and many others voiced the same opinion.
ga7 wrote:Hmm. I'm not too convinced. Sounds like a claim made in a hurry while about to be lynched, without even a name. I think it's BS.
ace1217 wrote:Somebody needs to vote skoff, I don't trust the claim
FloresDelMal wrote:i think she's scum just having fun and making us feel anxious about voting her.
I decided to reread and was still on the fence.
ace1217 wrote:I say vote her, my gut doesn't approve of the claim in this case, I doubt its true
Ace tells me to vote her. I'm already suspicious of her claim, so I decided to do what I believed was a decent lynch.
So basically, I saw Skoffin's roleclaim as sounding pretty fake. Make what you want of it.