Moderator: Community Team
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Ragian wrote:Have you decided on my question?
Ragian wrote:madmitch wrote:@ Ragian, I think thee protests to much
Show me my protesting.
@manda, well, in that case, are you scum since you're pounding on the first thing you see? Don't you qualify as scum the same way as you're saying dakky does?
mandalorian2298 wrote:Fair enough. As you say I haven't played with you before, so I can't metagame your usual playing style. Since we are on the page 2 od Day 1, unless someone does something really spectacular, I can only be suspicious of the little things like that, and it's IMO it's better to beat the bushes and maybe make someone jump then to do nothing and waste the Day. I would have voted you for it, but since it IS a thin lead, and you do have some votes on you already, I settled on the FOS as the middle road.
dakky21 wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:De ja Vou all over again. Let me guess you need to be lynched on odd days this game??
LMAO. Anyway, as they said before, don't reference active games with this one.TimWoodbury wrote:just tell the truth dakky you just simply love me:) you should know very well alredy that i joke vote whoever never cared much for whoever i joke vote for as its imply a joe obviously we dont wanna kill a person whos not gonna be playing/looking to be replaced right from the get go maybe down the road day 3-4 if still here and still not playing or wantig to pay but thats esides the fact
In my eyes, you're just digging yourself deeper with that unprovoked defense. No one followed my attack, but you're still defending, trying to solve the situation. One more minus in my book, you can say you were joking and all but defending like this with only me on your head is... another question mark to me.
dakky21 wrote:Army of GOD wrote:At first my vote on dakky was in jest, obviously, but his overreaction to a joke vote against a non-player seemed way too over the top and try hard.
Let it be known that my vote on dakky has converted into serious
You didn't played last 10 games here so you obviously don't know how things work... you have full right to be serious, but you should know some patterns which regularly happen, and some of those are voting for not playing character or person... I remember my first game where I got insta-lynched for voting for Arnold Schwarzenegger (or someone like him).... these things make you smarter
the white rose wrote:rizky_biznezz wrote:Go on rose get ur joke in quick.. But it better be funny lol
well then gotta vote tim cos i always do, true he always flips town, but i must get it right sooner or later
TimWoodbury wrote:dakky21 wrote:Yes, I was serious. They taught me that joke voting for someone who is not playing is generally scummy.
So Tim voting Aladdin sounds scummy to me. Joke vote phase is more important than you think... inexperienced players easily reveal themselves.
just tell the truth dakky you just simply love me:) you should know very well alredy that i joke vote whoever never cared much for whoever i joke vote for as its imply a joe obviously we dont wanna kill a person whos not gonna be playing/looking to be replaced right from the get go maybe down the road day 3-4 if still here and still not playing or wantig to pay but thats esides the fact
TimWoodbury wrote:dakky21 wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:De ja Vou all over again. Let me guess you need to be lynched on odd days this game??
LMAO. Anyway, as they said before, don't reference active games with this one.TimWoodbury wrote:just tell the truth dakky you just simply love me:) you should know very well alredy that i joke vote whoever never cared much for whoever i joke vote for as its imply a joe obviously we dont wanna kill a person whos not gonna be playing/looking to be replaced right from the get go maybe down the road day 3-4 if still here and still not playing or wantig to pay but thats esides the fact
In my eyes, you're just digging yourself deeper with that unprovoked defense. No one followed my attack, but you're still defending, trying to solve the situation. One more minus in my book, you can say you were joking and all but defending like this with only me on your head is... another question mark to me.
i respond as i see fit your the only one who saw my joke vote as scummy others thought you was crazy and that last post was simply saying it was a joke vote. with that its the last im gonna say towards that lets move on as its not gonna go anywhere just ends in me and you back forth wich dont help town at all
TimWoodbury wrote:dakky21 wrote:Army of GOD wrote:At first my vote on dakky was in jest, obviously, but his overreaction to a joke vote against a non-player seemed way too over the top and try hard.
Let it be known that my vote on dakky has converted into serious
You didn't played last 10 games here so you obviously don't know how things work... you have full right to be serious, but you should know some patterns which regularly happen, and some of those are voting for not playing character or person... I remember my first game where I got insta-lynched for voting for Arnold Schwarzenegger (or someone like him).... these things make you smarter
each player has there own patterns i dont think ive ever actually voted for a person who wasnt wanting to be in the game though there was 1 game i was wanting to vte for inactives and i was town in that one.
TimWoodbury wrote:dakky21 wrote:Army of GOD wrote:At first my vote on dakky was in jest, obviously, but his overreaction to a joke vote against a non-player seemed way too over the top and try hard.
Let it be known that my vote on dakky has converted into serious
You didn't played last 10 games here so you obviously don't know how things work... you have full right to be serious, but you should know some patterns which regularly happen, and some of those are voting for not playing character or person... I remember my first game where I got insta-lynched for voting for Arnold Schwarzenegger (or someone like him).... these things make you smarter
each player has there own patterns i dont think ive ever actually voted for a person who wasnt wanting to be in the game though there was 1 game i was wanting to vte for inactives and i was town in that one.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
dakky21 wrote:Tim, if you got a post restriction, please tell us now, because I don't understand you anything and I think you tried to wrote everything correct.... another minus for you, but let's speak about that at another time...
Looks like you can't use interpunctions like commas (,) and dots (.) so really, please, say if you got such a role. You're unreadable otherwise and still my no1 suspect.
Iron Butterfly wrote:vote Hotshot
His play style has grown old for me. Post something relevant or get lynched. This whole "Busy with life, sorry no time to post,Ill read up and post what I think later." will not be excepted this game by me
This could go for a few others as well but HS has a history of playing like this and it really helps no one. We have short days this game.
dakky21 wrote:I still wonder where are some players like Mets.... didn't seen his post in a while...
BTW who replaced Aladdin?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users