naxus wrote:Sigh, was just saying that ive seen it happen before. Didn't mean for a whole discussion to be based off of it
So you're saying discussion is a bad thing? Cause it sounds like you're upset about it.
Moderator: Community Team
naxus wrote:Sigh, was just saying that ive seen it happen before. Didn't mean for a whole discussion to be based off of it
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
naxus wrote:Now don't twist my words fir. Discussion is great but day one discussion is usually useless cause it ends up a blind lynch anyway.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
mandalorian2298 wrote:Vote Fircoal for being Fircoal.
Sorry for the inactivity guys, but I feel kind of sluggish lately.
ShaggyDan wrote:I agree with StrikeWolf's reasoning about the wagon, and that large joke wagons should be discouraged. However I do think Sheep's vote was typical joke-vote. He withdrawed it quickly, which either means he realised it went a little beyond a joke, or he was intentionally backpedalling on a slightly scummy move. Personally I think the former.
Sorry I don't have more to contribute, been a bit busy with other games/RL. That and nothing major has really jumped out at me.
naxus wrote:Joke voting someone is fine, but jokevoting someone to L-3 or L-4 is a little to far. Ive seen a couple games where joke voting allowed the mafia to speed hammer someone
naxus wrote:Joke voting someone is fine, but jokevoting someone to L-3 or L-4 is a little to far. Ive seen a couple games where joke voting allowed the mafia to speed hammer someone
Iliad wrote:It does look like Naxus tried to prove his town status and jumped at the opportunity.
Regardless strike wasn't in any danger, and neither did sheeps vote put him in any. It would've been nice if the joke votes continued, but I guess we're through on the other side now.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Fircoal wrote:naxus wrote:Now don't twist my words fir. Discussion is great but day one discussion is usually useless cause it ends up a blind lynch anyway.
So you're saying that we shouldn't discuss at all day 1? Gee I wonder how much info we could get from that. :3
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Not sure what the case against me here is. If you did you read back you would've seen how I did participate in the joke vote stage and I did joke vote so you must've skimmed if you missed mine, however a day after my joke vote sheep's vote and naxus overreaction happened, ending the joke vote stage. So I enjoyed the joke vote stage while it happened, and thought it was pretty fun.VioIet wrote:Iliad wrote:It does look like Naxus tried to prove his town status and jumped at the opportunity.
Regardless strike wasn't in any danger, and neither did sheeps vote put him in any. It would've been nice if the joke votes continued, but I guess we're through on the other side now.
For someone who says that the joke vote stage was so much fun, you surely weren't an active participant in it. I just re-read the whole thread, and I didn't see any joke votes that popped out at me- that were composed by you. And I didn't even think the joke vote stage in this game was funny. I think you are normally a very articulate player. If you truly meant that you were just going to miss the joke vote phase, because you thought it was so hilarious- i think you would have phrased the wording in your post better. Fir called you out on it first, and saf said it was miscommunication- but i don't think so.
And FOS Sheep, because I think he probably lost count and thought that he hammered.
And yes i realize it sounds like I'm rambling a bit- but its late at night, and I'm operating on about 5 hours sleep. So my apologies if I'm incoherent. Hopefully you get the gist of what I'm trying to say.
And before I forgot.
Unvote
Vote Illiad
strike wolf wrote:Fircoal wrote:naxus wrote:Now don't twist my words fir. Discussion is great but day one discussion is usually useless cause it ends up a blind lynch anyway.
So you're saying that we shouldn't discuss at all day 1? Gee I wonder how much info we could get from that. :3
I'll go ahead and unvote sheep but I want to hear naxus' answer to this before I come to a decision on this wagon.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
naxus wrote:strike wolf wrote:Fircoal wrote:naxus wrote:Now don't twist my words fir. Discussion is great but day one discussion is usually useless cause it ends up a blind lynch anyway.
So you're saying that we shouldn't discuss at all day 1? Gee I wonder how much info we could get from that. :3
I'll go ahead and unvote sheep but I want to hear naxus' answer to this before I come to a decision on this wagon.
Im not saying we shouldn't discuss day but that in 9/10s of all mafia games, the day one lynch is random. Only real good lynches happen off of a newbie slip up D1. And fir is screwing with me and its not funny
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Fircoal wrote:naxus wrote:strike wolf wrote:Fircoal wrote:naxus wrote:Now don't twist my words fir. Discussion is great but day one discussion is usually useless cause it ends up a blind lynch anyway.
So you're saying that we shouldn't discuss at all day 1? Gee I wonder how much info we could get from that. :3
I'll go ahead and unvote sheep but I want to hear naxus' answer to this before I come to a decision on this wagon.
Im not saying we shouldn't discuss day but that in 9/10s of all mafia games, the day one lynch is random. Only real good lynches happen off of a newbie slip up D1. And fir is screwing with me and its not funny
So just because D1 is usually random we should continue to make it random? You don't even wanna try to make a D1 based off of facts. Also you again fail to note the effect that it has on the later game. Try again.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
naxus wrote:Fircoal wrote:naxus wrote:strike wolf wrote:Fircoal wrote:
So you're saying that we shouldn't discuss at all day 1? Gee I wonder how much info we could get from that. :3
I'll go ahead and unvote sheep but I want to hear naxus' answer to this before I come to a decision on this wagon.
Im not saying we shouldn't discuss day but that in 9/10s of all mafia games, the day one lynch is random. Only real good lynches happen off of a newbie slip up D1. And fir is screwing with me and its not funny
So just because D1 is usually random we should continue to make it random? You don't even wanna try to make a D1 based off of facts. Also you again fail to note the effect that it has on the later game. Try again.
I never said that it didn't affect late game, I just said the lynch is random. Trying to really build a case on the usual D1 stuff that happens is flimsy at best. Also what facts are you referring too?
@strike I appreciate the irony in that statement but it still sucks
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Fircoal wrote:It doesn't really matter what this Day 1 lynch comes from as long as we can extract infos from it.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
naxus wrote:Now don't twist my words fir. Discussion is great but day one discussion is usually useless cause it ends up a blind lynch anyway.
Streaker wrote:I agree with naxus. Day 1 lynches are part random, because of the lack of evidence. You seem to use this as the main reason not to lynch you. The discussion with Fir isn't doing you much good either.
Lynching naxus is as good random as any other, even better. He's acting must scummy, and real evidence is hard to find Day 1.
I'll hold off voting until I see the VC though.
naxus wrote:Ok my vote on sheep was not me trying to get him lynched, I just threw a vote out there because he was a tad scummy. I havn't built a case against someone who has only really jokevoted and hasn't posted since saturdayFircoal wrote:It doesn't really matter what this Day 1 lynch comes from as long as we can extract infos from it.
Thats what i'm saying.
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
safariguy5 wrote:naxus wrote:Now don't twist my words fir. Discussion is great but day one discussion is usually useless cause it ends up a blind lynch anyway.
That to me sounded unusual for naxus, I don't remember him being this strong on language. Aggressive sounding post to me. I'm still with fircoal on this one, if nothing else, the naxus wagon has begun delineating some of the different sides that people are on. However, naxus seems really uncomfortable in this position, something that townies usually don't react to quite as defensively.
naxus wrote:Ok my vote on sheep was not me trying to get him lynched, I just threw a vote out there because he was a tad scummy. I havn't built a case against someone who has only really jokevoted and hasn't posted since saturdayFircoal wrote:It doesn't really matter what this Day 1 lynch comes from as long as we can extract infos from it.
Thats what i'm saying.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users