Moderator: Community Team
Metsfanmax wrote:HotShot53 wrote:12.Metsfanmax - Got into a big fight with storr day 1, from which storr town reads him. Voted streaker because he wanted to just go along with whomever storr wanted to lynch (sheeping),
A moment's reflection should point out how obviously wrong this is. The entire basis of my play up to that point was that Storr was scum, and that we were likely to hit town. I said that I wanted Storr's target to get lynched precisely because I expected that Storr's target would flip town, bolstering my point that Storr was scum so that we could lynch him on D2.then after the claim unvoted and gave reasons he believe the claim, even though wing stated definitively that it was a fake claim.
Storr answered this point sufficiently. I am not an idiot. The last thing I would do as scum there is to draw attention to myself by unvoting when I had already switched on to Storr's case and said I wanted Storr's pick to be lynched. Streaker was clearly going to die at that point unless something miraculous happened, so what did it gain me?
Metsfanmax wrote:Makes the statement that we are going to lynch storr or marashu today, anything else is wasting time. Although on day 1, he said "Also, lol at your argument against lone voters. That's a great attitude: never start a case against someone new, just sheep on what other people are doing."
Yes, and I acknowledged that there might be a seeming contradiction between the two stances. I don't think there was in context, because I was actually going hard against Storr and making a serious, game-long case out of it; most of the other people today have made half-hearted votes and not defended them further even as the day evolved. But even if I did change my stance when the circumstances changed (something I try not to do), that's not alignment indicative; it doesn't take being scum to want to be right.
Metsfanmax wrote:When I gave him a FOS for the statement, he defends himself by stating "basically no one is doubting my town affiliation at this point in the game", doing what he didn't like storr doing of stating he's confirmed town basically.
I don't like saying someone is confirmed town when the "confirmation" is themselves saying it a lot based on disputed circumstances. I have been exonerated as town by multiple players (implicitly or explicitly) this game, without any real dispute about those circumstances, and you are one of the only people who is doubting it at this time. So the point here is that you'd better have a good reason to go after me.
Metsfanmax wrote:Switches his vote back to marashu by quoting marashu's giving his win condition.
I obviously intended not to say why I am voting based on that, but since you are saying that your win condition is consistent with his, I will not say that it is not consistent with mine. (Maybe you are both scum?)
virus90 wrote:@ marashu, why do you vote got tonka'd. we have 1 day, no one votes him yet. you dont make a case, seems like a waste of vote & time
its not that i disagree, i already stated that GT is on my scum list 2, so i would be fine with pressuring him, but you dont seem to make an effort. besides your list post was mwah to me. many reads i disagreed with.
marashu is fair game for a lynch in my opinion. i wouldnt mind a second claim, preferably from talapus (or GT).
got tonkaed wrote:Townies really dont have to stick themselves out there all the time to not get mislynched, they just need people to know create nothing cases on them and then get bandwagoned.
got tonkaed wrote:I was saying since i wasnt one of the power scum characters, I wouldn't be a lynch/shot candidate.
Unless you think we shouldn't go after power scum, in which case I guess I would come up with a different defense.
StorrZerg wrote:1. you can't like his read on mets, because there was never a read on mets.
2, you can't like his read on me, because your town reading me.
3. you side with him on tonk for his scum read of ":GT - gt does seem kinda scummy to me. Not really getting a town read from him."
so yes, im calling you out for liking his reads, when they are not describing anything, at most you can say you like who he is calling town/scum, yet the first 3 that come to mind for me have no substance or differ from your reads.
So yes, i want you to explain what reads you like, cause clearly im not getting it, and im calling you out for bs
Marashu wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:Suppose Storr does claim Padan Fain. What would you do then?
A world does not exist where Fain is pro-town. Storr would fake claim if he is Fain. If we do get a name claim out of him, then we need to decide if he's telling the truth or not.mtamburini wrote:People voting for storr need to wake up and not be stupid or Ill just lynch all of you
Ok, so other reads (will be quick impressions since I need to leave in like 15 minutes).
virus - I like his reads. I'd lean town with virus.
Wing - I'm having a tough time reading Wing. My gut is saying town. Still wondering about his certainty about Streaker's fakeclaim.
mtam - I think that mtam is probably town. I feel like he would be explaining his plays more if he were scum so that people could keep up with his thought process, instead of doing what he's doing to rock the boat and get scum to slip.
mitch - I feel like mitch is town.
Storr - Still leaning anti-town with him. Worried that if he is left unchecked for too long it will spell a town loss, which is why if he is anti-town, he's the better pick to get rid of early. My vote's staying on him - even if not a lynch, I would like to see a name claim from him.
HS - I really would like to hear more from him.
GT - gt does seem kinda scummy to me. Not really getting a town read from him.
DD - If Storr is scum DD is town. I can't see them being scumbuddies. If, somehow, Storr is town, then the way he was tunneling Storr seems weird to me. But I totally understand his apprehension about Storr. DD is neutral to me.
Mets - The comment about today's lynch being Storr or myself, well, I think it's weird and stymies discussion. I'm leaning scum with him.
IB - IB is playing pro-town, and I feel like it's legit, so I think he's town.
Tal - was skeptical about him at first. His going into more detail about his D1 action has eased those. Neutral leaning town.
HotShot53 wrote:The difference is who the cases are on... yesterday when you said to look at new cases, the main case was on streaker. Today when you don't want new cases, it's on storr and marashu, both of whom I think are town.
Or maybe some groups of town have different win condition statements than others. Remember the last game where win conditions were allowed to be discussed, where town all have variations so it couldn't be used as an insta-win pass phrase?
HotShot53 wrote:More than once I've seen someone claim, and people say "that's a reasonable claim" and everyone jumps off the wagon. It very well could have happened yesterday, if wing hadn't insisted that the claim was fake. So, it didn't gain you anything in this case... but it could have if you could have convinced others his claim was reasonable.
The difference is who the cases are on... yesterday when you said to look at new cases, the main case was on streaker. Today when you don't want new cases, it's on storr and marashu, both of whom I think are town.
Or maybe some groups of town have different win condition statements than others. Remember the last game where win conditions were allowed to be discussed, where town all have variations so it couldn't be used as an insta-win pass phrase?
got tonkaed wrote:The entire case against me is Marashu trying to avoid getting lynched.
Marashu wrote:those who make it to the Eye of the World are Rand, Mat, Perrin, Moiraine, Lan, Egwene, Nynaeve, Loial, and you could make the argument for Bela ... Argument could also be made for Thom
Marashu wrote:As for my case on GT, well...got tonkaed wrote:Townies really dont have to stick themselves out there all the time to not get mislynched, they just need people to know create nothing cases on them and then get bandwagoned.
And yet on the same page as he posts this, Storr tells him to vote (actually, they have a big conversation about how he's doing nothing but talking circles and Storr tells him he needs to take action) so he jumps on my wagon because it's odd that I didn't consider something and share with the class.got tonkaed wrote:I was saying since i wasnt one of the power scum characters, I wouldn't be a lynch/shot candidate.
Unless you think we shouldn't go after power scum, in which case I guess I would come up with a different defense.
This is such a weird quote to me. It's wrong on a few levels. First, the argument of not being a candidate because he's not a claimed villain, well, it implies that we should ignore goons to hunt powerscum when we don't know whether or not they are all powerscum (Streaker didn't flip a role, so for all we know he could have been a scum roleblocker). He is also projecting and putting words into Wing's mouth by implying that Wing doesn't want to hunt powerscum (and therefore does not want to hunt scum). Third, he's really driving home that he does not believe name claims matter, because people will not claim villain names - but his case on me was that I did not consider Storr to be a certain flavour character. Finally, his whole powerscum discussion thing is weird because we don't know if named villains even exist, but he is likely a power role if not a powerscum role or else I feel like he would have made the commuter trade.
Speaking of, he claims he visited Storr because it was an inactive at the time. So he didn't know what the visit did, but wanted to make sure it wouldn't really be noticed. I think it's kind of weird.
got tonkaed wrote:Because I am not a mafia member. Mafia players overread situations to try and bandwagon.
The only case toward me being scum would be that I was very inactive at the end of D1. The fact that I pretty much missed the deadline entirely, not just didn't vote streaker or defend him, should be evidence that my inactivity was RL based not game based.
Townies don't try to create cases where there aren't cases. Keep that in mind wing.
rishaed wrote:Vote Count:
Marashu (4) - gotTonkaed, WCmdrG, Storr, madmitch, Mets, IB
Storr (0) - Marashu, IB, Mets
Mets (1) - mtamburini
Talapus (1) - virus90
GT (4) - Mars, Hotshot, IB, Storr
Hotshot (0) - Storr
With 14 alive it takes 8 to lynch. Deadline July 11th.
rishaed wrote:Vote Count:
With 14 alive it takes 8 to lynch. Deadline July 11th.
got tonkaed wrote:The entire case against me is Marashu trying to avoid getting lynched.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users