
Moderator: Community Team
sully800 wrote:anyway, here we govote e_i_pi
e_i_pi wrote:Lynched for accusing a lurker, and then recanting when the lurker turned up and seemed legit. God bless democracy
Oh, and before I go to the gallows, I'll point the FOS at Sully... strange how he doesn't vote til the last minute, all the while claiming to be the impartial investigator. He seems to have sat on the sidelines until the knife can go in the back without it coming back on him. Isn't he a veteran of mafia games? Someone who knows how to play them? Amazing how he's suspicious of me, yet provides no reason for suspicion. He's had his eye on me the whole time apparently... oh wait, no he hasn't... only since I had 3 votes. A little odd, don't you think, trying to talk up how suspicious I am in the dying moments when the clock is ticking down? Almost as if he were trying to tell a convincing story that hopefully someone else would believe, such that they would ring the death knell, so he didn't have to appear suspicious himself by casting a vote. Look at him acting as the kind elderly family friend, pretending to play the impartial referee, all the while the fatal gavel being inextricably held in his paw. What is it we call an elderly male family friend? Oh yes, that's right... godfather...
AceArtemis wrote:Deadline is in about 46 hours from the time of this post. Remember that at deadlines, the player with the most votes is lynched.
AceArtemis wrote:8. Once you are killed, you are eliminated from the game. No posting once you are dead.
sully800 wrote:Now this is going to sound suspicious, but I want a fair game and I don't believe you are allowed to talk any more in this thread. If we lynched you and you were innocent then I apologize, but I will guarantee everyone I am not mafia.AceArtemis wrote:8. Once you are killed, you are eliminated from the game. No posting once you are dead.
sully800 wrote:That's strange. I guess then its 4 votes for us to give a message to Ace to kill him. Not 4 votes to lynch him directly![]()
Stroop wrote:sully800 wrote:Now this is going to sound suspicious, but I want a fair game and I don't believe you are allowed to talk any more in this thread. If we lynched you and you were innocent then I apologize, but I will guarantee everyone I am not mafia.AceArtemis wrote:8. Once you are killed, you are eliminated from the game. No posting once you are dead.
Until the mod actually posts the dead scene, he's not dead
Ghost of e_i_pi wrote:This was my understanding, sorry if I inadvertantly broke the rules. GL guys!
Mr. Squirrel in reference to me and Hopscotcher wrote:See everyone! He admits to lying! That scum.![]()
fos: sully
And for the record:unvote. Hopscotcher is already at 2 and with only 4 needed to lynch, I wouldn't want him to be lynched because of my joke vote.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:wcaclimbing wrote:Unless some better evidence comes up, I'm going to no vote. or vote no lynch. or whatever I'm supposed to say to officially not vote for anyone.
I just don't feel comfortable voting someone out with so little evidence to work with. If someone brings up something good later on, I may change my vote. But for now, I don't want to lynch when we could so easily kill a townie.
And what will change by the second day? If we just don't lynch anyone today, day 2 will be no different than day 1. I don't see the point in not lynching. We are gonna have to eventually, otherwise the mafia will never die.
In fact, I find your opinion rather scummy...vote wca
Mr. Squirrel responding to Stroops accusations wrote:Stroop wrote:Mr. Squirrel has said a lot of useless stuff and now he intends to sit back until someone makes a mistake.
Well, it's kind of hard to say anything useful when you have no posts from anyone else to go by. Right now, sitting back is the only option since I have no info to go on.
Mr. Squirrel accusing simon and wca wrote:I'm gonna have to help out pi here. I don't see why you two are trying to lynch him for being a lurker. For starters, there has been very little to discuss so far in this game unless you wanted to start analyzing joke/random votes. Plus, he wasn't inactive for that long (he posted on page 4).
I think the fact that you two are pushing this so quickly and are trying to form a bandwagon, is far more scummy than what pi has done.
vote simon viavant
Mr. Squirrel battling with Simon and wca at once wrote:Hopscotcher wrote:am by no means suggesting we lynch Simon. He may be totally innocent. If the vote were close to a lynch for Simon, I'd Unvote. But I'm sticking to my guns.
You think he's scum but you don't want to lynch him, how in the world does that make sense? And btw, he is very close to a lynch. In fact, one more vote for him and he is lynched.Simon Viavant wrote:FOS mr. squirrel you really are obvious.
I decided to side with pi simply because I don't see the case you have against him. He didn't post for two days, so what? In that whole time there was only a handful of posts so it is not like he was the only one not active. Plus, he says he was busy with work, which should always come before an internet game. I'm not saying he's innocent or guilty (I'm still not sure myself). I just don't think your reasoning is strong enough to deserve him getting lynched. If you could find some more concrete evidence of his scumminess, I would have no problem casting the fourth vote against him.
I think you are just trying to push a lynch early on in the game when we have very little information to go by. That way, when you and your mafia partner decide to kill off somebody tonight, you guys won't look suspicious since no enemies or connections were made on day 1. Very sneaky of you.
And FOS on wca. You seemed awfully eager to place your vote on pi despite the fact that a few pages ago you were dead set in voting no lynch.
Mr. Squirrel finally switching his accusations to Hopscotcher wrote:So basically you are claiming that you will vote for any of the three most suspicious people as long as other people are voting for them? You say that maybe viavant is scum but WCA "screams" scum to you. If so, why don't you change your vote? Why would you keep a vote on someone who you are unsure about, especially when they are this close to a lynch?
The reason is because you want to see a lynch. Despite what you said earlier here:If the vote were close to a lynch for Simon, I'd Unvote.
Simon has been one vote away from a lynch for a while now and you still have yet to unvote. You just want to see a townie get lynched. That is why you are willing to change your vote to wca if there is a large surge towards it but for now you want to stay on the one with the most votes.
unvote simon
vote hopscotcher
This guy just "screams" scum to me.
Stroop wrote:I'm going to point a finger at sully. The whole game he does nothing but FOS people (I think he literally FOSed everyone...)
Hopscotcher wrote:I like this plan!
Vote Hopscotcher
Hopscotcher wrote:I like this plan!
Vote Hopscotcher
sully800 wrote:I make a really long post with as much detail as I can gather.
Hopscotcher votes for himself.
sully800 wrote:Before we here the verdict, I would like to call that Stroop and wca are the scum in this game
Users browsing this forum: No registered users