Balance Not Included Come Back Mafia End Game: Mod Down!!!

[dakky21]

I keep accidentally clicking the wrong one.
You wrongfully assumed I'd offer you peace in this game or any game if I were able to do so as a point against me, this is simply untrue. There are few people I would so casually offer peace to.

So without knowing if those people are of your own alignment, you would offer them peace, while you wouldn't offer the same thing to the people you don't know? That's called meta I think, but it still bothers me why would you act like that. In each separate game we're all supposed to be equal, so saying those things makes me wonder.

[nagerous]

I keep accidentally clicking the wrong one.
You wrongfully assumed I'd offer you peace in this game or any game if I were able to do so as a point against me, this is simply untrue. There are few people I would so casually offer peace to.

So without knowing if those people are of your own alignment, you would offer them peace, while you wouldn't offer the same thing to the people you don't know? That's called meta I think, but it still bothers me why would you act like that. In each separate game we're all supposed to be equal, so saying those things makes me wonder.

I don't think you can call meta when alignments in other games are still in question. We should focus on this game as the other game is irrelevant for now.

[dakky21]

I don't think you can call meta when alignments in other games are still in question. We should focus on this game as the other game is irrelevant for now.

I'm not talking about the other game. I'm talking about Skoffin willing to accept truces from some selected players and not from others, while each game should be separated from each other. I am focused on this one and she is contradictory to herself, first defending me about changing strategy and then not willing to accept that it was a defense. I see it like any other attempt to look pro town - "protect the innocent" and then when accused "I'm not defending you" tactics...

[Skoffin]

I keep accidentally clicking the wrong one.
You wrongfully assumed I'd offer you peace in this game or any game if I were able to do so as a point against me, this is simply untrue. There are few people I would so casually offer peace to.

So without knowing if those people are of your own alignment, you would offer them peace, while you wouldn't offer the same thing to the people you don't know? That's called meta I think, but it still bothers me why would you act like that. In each separate game we're all supposed to be equal, so saying those things makes me wonder.

I don't think you can call meta when alignments in other games are still in question. We should focus on this game as the other game is irrelevant for now.

I'm not talking about the other game. I'm talking about Skoffin willing to accept truces from some selected players and not from others, while each game should be separated from each other. I am focused on this one and she is contradictory to herself, first defending me about changing strategy and then not willing to accept that it was a defense. I see it like any other attempt to look pro town - "protect the innocent" and then when accused "I'm not defending you" tactics...

What is contradictory here? And what do you mean by "defending me about changing strategy and then not willing to accept that it was a defense."?

You are bringing up a mechanic from another game that does not even exist in this game, it's hardly relevant to anything that happens in here. And no, I don't agree that all players are equal. Let's be honest, some players are far more valuable than others; this can be based on particular roles etc from within a particular game, or it can be more broad in games simply due to their skill level in the game. In that game I accept a truce as it seemed beneficial for me to do so, and because wing seemed to be a more valuable player to me than the other person who offered me a truce. But let's also not forget that a lot of my posting style lately has been merely for my own comedic purposes and not much more than that. The game is meant to be fun and I am posting in a way that feels humorous to me.

As for the "I'm not defending you" bit, well that's how we view these sorts of things. I'm not defending you specifically, I'm defending the concept; you just happen to be the person brought up in in regard to that concept. I am 100% in favour of changing playstyles and adapting to each game and as such I disagreed with Tim's assessment, therefore it's reasonable for me to publicly disagree with his thoughts on that matter. Furthermore, his notion was just outright dumb and I always think it's good to point out things that are dumb. Jajaja

For the record, it's also in my favour to point out now why I disagreed with Tim's post. I have clearly changed my own playstyle since the last game that was played here, in fact I quite clearly stated as much in the Civ game you have been referencing, so Tim is essentially also saying that I am being scummy for adapting my playstyle. Out of interest, if you were going to go to the trouble of bringing up the civ game and how it makes people look in this game as justification as to why I am 'scummy' for arguing with Tim about adapting playstyles why would you leave out the only point that may have actually been relevant here? (

[Ragian]

Sheesh, Dakky. Try not reading everything literally. There must be room for poetic and dramatic language.

[strike wolf]

Gah!this site seems to be eating my posts the last couple of days

*Official warning: Editing posts as stated in the rules is not allowed, since the editing was most likely an unintentional violation, no punishment shall be given. This will not excuse further editing. Future editing will result in punishment up to but not exceeding modkill. *

Vote Count

Dakky (2)-tim, Sam
Nag (2)-Chuzilla, Nag
Mitch (1)-DJ
Mets (1)-Legion
Legion (1)-Rage
Rage
DirtyDishsoap
Chu
Tim
Skoffin
Djfireside
Samlen

With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline set for Monday 2/20 currently. May change if activity does not improve.

[DirtyDishSoap]

My bad on that one, sorry!

[TimWoodbury]

changing strategy is still change of strategy weather for good reason or not (his reason is good and acceptable) but still if we know he played a certian way in previous games under certian situations and does the opposite here it will throw up red flags

Yes Tim, you are right, it throws up red flags (it's a clear meta), but consider it this way, maybe I want to see what will happen if I don't claim D1 and try to hunt scum without proving I'm town based on role PM's. Having two games active at a same time makes this even more complicated because claiming here can impact the claims in the other game. Let's just try something new, shall we?

i am fine with new things i was jsut explaining why it could possably be viewed as bad and deff give you a thumbs up for admitting that the playstyle you had wasnt working

[TimWoodbury]

That's a ridiculous argument; you are essentially saying that no one should ever consider adapting their style of play or aim to improve their performance because it might make it harder for other people (such as yourself) to figure out their alignment. That problem is not on Dakky to resolve, that would mean that you should adapt and get better at feeling scumtells and slips. Preposterous.

i will admit that i gotta gt better myself at reading people must say at least i aint getting any worse at reading them

[TimWoodbury]

PS folks sorry about not posting the past couple days had my miltiary things this weekend and was super busy. got a snow storm headded my way dropping bout 2 feet of snow may lose power in case i dissapear (if i lsoe power ill get somewhere with power so i can still play)

[Metsfanmax]

Gah!this site seems to be eating my posts the last couple of days

*Official warning: Editing posts as stated in the rules is not allowed, since the editing was most likely an unintentional violation, no punishment shall be given. This will not excuse further editing. Future editing will result in punishment up to but not exceeding modkill. *

Vote Count

Dakky (2)-tim, Sam
Nag (2)-Chuzilla, Nag
Mitch (1)-DJ
Mets (2)-Legion
Legion (1)-Rage
Rage
DirtyDishsoap
Chu
Tim
Skoffin
Djfireside
Samlen

With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline set for Monday 2/20 currently. May change if activity does not improve.

Is there a double voter, or did you count me wrong?

[strike wolf]

Fixed

[Djfireside]

Good Catch Mets. I can see the struggle with Dakky, changing how you play and the expectations of you from game to game. As it was already noted, some people and their skills/pitfalls are brought through each game. Especially a pain on D1 since everything is up in the air with very little to go on.

[Skoffin]

Things have gotten very slow here, if only we had wing to slap us into gear.

Let's do something. Let's shake things up. Let's threaten people with votes

Vote samlen

[dakky21]

Things have gotten very slow here, if only we had wing to slap us into gear.

Let's do something. Let's shake things up. Let's threaten people with votes

Vote samlen

Out of nowhere... you vote samlen because... <insert reason here> ... or the reason is let's just vote random people to force them to claim? You should have started with me if that's what you're trying to achieve.

Anyway, I'll give a WEAK reason why I will follow you... samlen didn't post here since Feb 10 which is 4 days which could be scumarining.

[Skoffin]

Stating my reasons openly doesn't garner as much info if I state those reasons before Samlen can even react to it. My goal is not to get random people to claim, so no, no reason to start with you.

[dakky21]

BTW skoff, why didn't you put it in bold and GREEN? Just noticed the rule. Won't follow you after all since your vote is a joke.

[Skoffin]

Well, it was in bold at least! Rules should be in the first post, bah!

vote Samlen

[Samlen]

Things have gotten very slow here, if only we had wing to slap us into gear.

Let's do something. Let's shake things up. Let's threaten people with votes

Vote samlen

S-s-s-shake it up! It's probably about time to remove my joke vote and poke the more inactive people (Most of us are inactive but Fircoal and Mitch haven't appeared for longest at 3 days \o/)
Unovte
Vote Mitch








9. Chu

[dakky21]

Well, it was in bold at least! Rules should be in the first post, bah!

vote Samlen

Ok, so you're confident. As I stated before:

Anyway, I'll give a WEAK reason why I will follow you... samlen didn't post here since Feb 10 which is 4 days which could be scumarining.

I'll also vote Samlen but I may retract my vote at any time.

[TimWoodbury]

unvote vote mitch

mitch wake up wake up you cant blame the silence on the other game due to it being night over there till today so why you being so quiet

[Metsfanmax]

unvote vote mitch

mitch wake up wake up you cant blame the silence on the other game due to it being night over there till today so why you being so quiet

vote Tim for thinking that this is scummy, have you even seen mitch play before, he doesn't know how to shut up when he's actually involved in the game.

[Samlen]

show

Woops sorry bout the bottom bit. I had copy/pasted the players list and gone backwards to see who was least active/who's latest post stretched the furthest back

Anyway, I'll give a WEAK reason why I will follow you... samlen didn't post here since Feb 10 which is 4 days which could be scumarining.

I'll also vote Samlen but I may retract my vote at any time.

It's still the 13th cc time but ye I've been inactive here unfortunately, mostly cause I don't know what to say.

[Fircoal]

Stating my reasons openly doesn't garner as much info if I state those reasons before Samlen can even react to it. My goal is not to get random people to claim, so no, no reason to start with you.

What are you even talking about? If you have reasons to vote him you should state those reasons, or what else is he going to respond to. Otherwise you're going fishing without any bait. I personally love my low quality bait.

Things have gotten very slow here, if only we had wing to slap us into gear.

Let's do something. Let's shake things up. Let's threaten people with votes

Vote samlen

S-s-s-shake it up! It's probably about time to remove my joke vote and poke the more inactive people (Most of us are inactive but Fircoal and Mitch haven't appeared for longest at 3 days \o/)
Unovte
Vote Mitch

I've been lazy. I really do need to post more though. x3 *yawns*

Well, it was in bold at least! Rules should be in the first post, bah!

vote Samlen

Ok, so you're confident. As I stated before:

Anyway, I'll give a WEAK reason why I will follow you... samlen didn't post here since Feb 10 which is 4 days which could be scumarining.

I'll also vote Samlen but I may retract my vote at any time.

Are you trying to start a bandwagon off of weak reasoning like that? I mean you admit it's weak and yet you vote him as well. After he posted too!

It's still the 13th cc time but ye I've been inactive here unfortunately, mostly cause I don't know what to say.

A likely story! How can you have nothing to say with all of this oodles of information that's just laying out there for the taking! You're scum that's why!

[Fircoal]

Oh FFFFFFFF. That post came out super ugly. Here's a much prettier version:

Stating my reasons openly doesn't garner as much info if I state those reasons before Samlen can even react to it. My goal is not to get random people to claim, so no, no reason to start with you.

What are you even talking about? If you have reasons to vote him you should state those reasons, or what else is he going to respond to. Otherwise you're going fishing without any bait. I personally love my low quality bait.

Things have gotten very slow here, if only we had wing to slap us into gear.

Let's do something. Let's shake things up. Let's threaten people with votes

Vote samlen

S-s-s-shake it up! It's probably about time to remove my joke vote and poke the more inactive people (Most of us are inactive but Fircoal and Mitch haven't appeared for longest at 3 days \o/)
Unovte
Vote Mitch

I've been lazy. I really do need to post more though. x3 *yawns*

Well, it was in bold at least! Rules should be in the first post, bah!

vote Samlen

Ok, so you're confident. As I stated before:

Anyway, I'll give a WEAK reason why I will follow you... samlen didn't post here since Feb 10 which is 4 days which could be scumarining.

I'll also vote Samlen but I may retract my vote at any time.

Are you trying to start a bandwagon off of weak reasoning like that? I mean you admit it's weak and yet you vote him as well. After he posted too!

It's still the 13th cc time but ye I've been inactive here unfortunately, mostly cause I don't know what to say.

A likely story! How can you have nothing to say with all of this oodles of information that's just laying out there for the taking! You're scum that's why!