Conquer Club

Posted: **Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:46 pm**

Just a question that came to mind

Posted: **Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:48 pm**

Puff wrote:Just a question that came to mind

A nice small game works just fine for me :wink:

Posted: **Thu Dec 07, 2006 12:54 pm**

i mostly play Terminator so more chance of getting away with not losing points if u can at least take 1 person out,so defo 6.

Posted: **Thu Dec 07, 2006 1:55 pm**

wow I did not expect the results to be like that :shock:

Posted: **Thu Dec 07, 2006 1:57 pm**

what did u expect???

Posted: **Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:01 pm**

5 player games are perfect, well for me at least

:D:D

Posted: **Thu Dec 07, 2006 2:39 pm**

gordon1975 wrote:what did u expect???

three player. Maybe 4, though I also did not think anyone would chose "I don't care"

Posted: **Thu Dec 07, 2006 4:30 pm**

out of interest i wondered why there arnt 2 player games filled by a neutral with other terrortories. probs a stupid question just curious

Posted: **Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:59 am**

I don't care
Single player I really don't care, prefer doubles to be 6 player, and the option to play with 8 on world map 2.0.

Posted: **Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:39 am**

4 or higher singles, 6 player doubles, rarely play triples (only for clan games).

Posted: **Fri Dec 08, 2006 8:45 am**

Only option i dont like is 3 way. Worst possible number of players although quite a few like it and thats kool. I CAN STAY CLAM lol :wink:

Posted: **Fri Dec 08, 2006 9:45 am**

Personally, I'd like to see an option for a two player game with a neutral 3rd...

But then again, I have my own agenda....

Posted: **Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:59 am**

For standard, I prefer 5, then 6. And I hate 3 players games, too. For triples, I like 4 players :wink:

Posted: **Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:59 pm**

I think North America needs 7 or 8.

Posted: **Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:03 pm**

Nous-irons wrote:I think North America needs 7 or 8.

Seven......or EIGHT?! (and I thought six was crazy).

Posted: **Sat Dec 09, 2006 2:09 am**

Nous-irons wrote:I think North America needs 7 or 8.

What about World 2.0

Posted: **Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:35 pm**

three player is the best...even on the world 2.0 map...

Posted: **Sat Dec 09, 2006 3:45 pm**

i prefer 3 players for triples games, but there is no option for that. i would have won for sure in such a case.

Posted: **Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:25 pm**

Selin wrote:i prefer 3 players for triples games, but there is no option for that. i would have won for sure in such a case.

umm, that would be one team...is that the point?

Posted: **Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:28 pm**

sorry to resurrect from dead. but is there a reason why we cant have two and neutral. Only thing i can think off is multis. I dont know :cry:

Posted: **Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:48 pm**

Lanceyboyuk wrote:sorry to resurrect from dead. but is there a reason why we cant have two and neutral. Only thing i can think off is multis. I dont know

There's the it's not fun thing...

Posted: **Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:32 pm**

The more players the better.

Posted: **Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:34 pm**

s.xkitten wrote:
Selin wrote:i prefer 3 players for triples games, but there is no option for that. i would have won for sure in such a case.

umm, that would be one team...is that the point?

kitten, like the pic in ur sig. :wink:

and i like 3 players, better chance of winning..... :wink:

Posted: **Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:41 pm**

I prefer small games myself (such as 3 or 4).

I personally don't like large single player games (5 or 6) because if the people take forever, you wait for days just to take your turn.

Never did a triples match, but I do like 6 players for team games. (Doubles = 3 teams)

Posted: **Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:52 pm**

I PLAY TERMINATOR ONLY,,,,,MORE BODIES TO STACK UP.6 IS BEST FOR ME .SUNTZU

Conquer Club

The number of players in a game

The number of players in a game

Re: The number of players in a game

How many players in a game