YET ANOTHER NEGATIVE BULLSHIT FEEDBACK
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:32 pmtime after time, i get the biggest bullshit feedbacks from noobs. i say we wipe the whole feedback system out. i spend too much time and energy getting them removed.
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/
YET ANOTHER NEGATIVE BULLSHIT FEEDBACK
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=9223
Page 1 of 4
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:32 pmPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:44 pmIt seems like a snowball effect to me JOHHNY. Once you get a few NF's it's open season on you.
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:45 pmThe guy who left your latest feedback isn't a noob.
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:57 pmhe is ranked 1798 and has never beaten me = noob
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:06 pmJOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:he is ranked 1798 and has never beaten me = noob
He joined the site 1 day after it was made, He's a major, he's played 234 games and you think he's a noob?
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:11 pmonly 234 games ? I played 950 games with another 80 in progress. so yes, hes a noob. kinda makes you wonder about his "opinions" when he lacks the experience ?.... oh, and the proof 
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:21 pmJOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:only 234 games ? I played 950 games with another 80 in progress. so yes, hes a noob. kinda makes you wonder about his "opinions" when he lacks the experience ?.... oh, and the proof
Quantity or quality. I prefer quality.
JR; Games Completed: 964 / 2385 points = 2.474 points per game
Hazmaniac; Games Completed: 239 / 1798 points = 7.52 points per game
Face it JR - your not as good as you think you are
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:34 pmwe all know the higher your ranked, the less points you win per game. ask blitz. Haz will get 30 points to my 5 points for beating the same player.
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:39 pmJOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:we all know the higher your ranked, the less points you win per game. ask blitz. Haz will get 30 points to my 5 points for beating the same player.
Hmmm a math problem...
He will actually get 6 or maximum 7 points for beating him, not 30.
You are so "experienced" and you dont yet know how the scoring system works. tsk tsk
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:46 pmi dont know what the pecentage is, but its a lot more than 6 points. if we both beat #1 blitz, he gets alot more than 1 point than me.
no
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:47 pmnooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
the feedback is a very important system to make sure secret alliances, foul language and other abusive behavior can be kept in check by the players themselves reducing the number of mods considerably.....
*granted, not all players mind negative feedback, but it keeps others in check
but far more importantly, i have a lot of them...
the feedback is a very important system to make sure secret alliances, foul language and other abusive behavior can be kept in check by the players themselves reducing the number of mods considerably.....
*granted, not all players mind negative feedback, but it keeps others in check
but far more importantly, i have a lot of them...
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:08 pmJOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:we all know the higher your ranked, the less points you win per game. ask blitz. Haz will get 30 points to my 5 points for beating the same player.
ok then - lets put me in the equation;
JR; Games Completed: 964 / 2385 points = 2.474 points per game
Hazmaniac; Games Completed: 239 / 1798 points = 7.52 points per game
Pedronicus; Games Completed: 352 / 2789 points = 7.92 points per game
I'm getting nothing for a win and crucified when i loose - and I'm still keeping my average points per game fairly high
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:23 pmyour off the point. he left me feedback with 0 proof and he was wrong. i dont like being accused of BS.
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 2:41 pmI may be going off the point of this thread - but it annoyed me to see you calling one of CC's longest serving members a noob.
Get off your high horse and treat other CC members with the respect that they are due.
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:kinda makes you wonder about his "opinions" when he lacks the experience ?
Get off your high horse and treat other CC members with the respect that they are due.
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:08 pmrespect ? again, he post BS about me and than I call him a noob, but I must show respect to him because hes been on this site like 3 months longer than me?
oh, it must be true what he posted because he signed up here before me. wow, that makes real sense. It must be true, because his points per game are higher. Are you for real?
oh, it must be true what he posted because he signed up here before me. wow, that makes real sense. It must be true, because his points per game are higher. Are you for real?
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:19 pmwut about the BS negative feedbac u left me makes poor game decisions u said and u also accused me of a alliance ok he asked for comments on his gameplay and i told him its not teaming especially if i ATTACK HIM so maybe u should stop leavin pointless feedbacs urself
game
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:26 pmyeah, at least he didnt blow you off the way he did me...gave him every last army and missed the second turn...i deleted my negative...i have only left two and deleted both...
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:28 pmmy god i told u y real life comes first
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:31 pmlol
he probably had a secret alliance with the other team !
he probably had a secret alliance with the other team !
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:35 pmyah and guess wut he asked for comments on his gameplay if u would like 2 check the game chat again go ahead and wut did i do i gave him comments but its not like i didnt attack him or unprotect my borders and hey JR i didnt no we were allowed 2 leave revenge feedbac but i guess u dont follow those rules
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:17 pmPedronicus wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:we all know the higher your ranked, the less points you win per game. ask blitz. Haz will get 30 points to my 5 points for beating the same player.
ok then - lets put me in the equation;
JR; Games Completed: 964 / 2385 points = 2.474 points per game
Hazmaniac; Games Completed: 239 / 1798 points = 7.52 points per game
Pedronicus; Games Completed: 352 / 2789 points = 7.92 points per game
I'm getting nothing for a win and crucified when i loose - and I'm still keeping my average points per game fairly high
This PPG system isn't very accurate. Mine is:
11 games / 1183 points = 107.5 ppg
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:22 pmWow... I don't think you need to be a Rodes scholar to understand what's wrong with this picture...
I think Johnney needs a time-out... nay, better still, an interlude to reflect.
Sadly, after reading this whole thread, it is questionable that Johnney will accede, or acquiesce, this austere bearing.
Therefore, it would appear to be an utter waste of effort to attempt to convince him otherwise.
*******************************************************************
Side note... there was a math error in the points per game above.
We all start with 1000 points. Below is the # of points GAINED per game played.
JR; Games Completed: 964 / 2385 points = Avg of 1.4 points GAINED per game
Hazmaniac; Games Completed: 239 / 1798 points = 3.3 points per game
Pedronicus; Games Completed: 352 / 2789 points = 7.1 points per game
Robinette; Games Completed: 172 / 2648 points = 9.6 points per game
I think Johnney needs a time-out... nay, better still, an interlude to reflect.
Sadly, after reading this whole thread, it is questionable that Johnney will accede, or acquiesce, this austere bearing.
Therefore, it would appear to be an utter waste of effort to attempt to convince him otherwise.
*******************************************************************
Side note... there was a math error in the points per game above.
We all start with 1000 points. Below is the # of points GAINED per game played.
JR; Games Completed: 964 / 2385 points = Avg of 1.4 points GAINED per game
Hazmaniac; Games Completed: 239 / 1798 points = 3.3 points per game
Pedronicus; Games Completed: 352 / 2789 points = 7.1 points per game
Robinette; Games Completed: 172 / 2648 points = 9.6 points per game
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:52 pmin a diversion attempt...i will make you all feel better about your per game score...
JR; Games Completed: 964 / 2385 points = Avg of 1.4 points GAINED per game d'oh!
Hazmaniac; Games Completed: 239 / 1798 points = 3.3 points per game Rolling Eyes
Pedronicus; Games Completed: 352 / 2789 points = 7.1 points per game Applause
Robinette; Games Completed: 172 / 2648 points = 9.6 points per game Cool
AA Games 620(50pending) 1769 points= 1.2 pts per game
Personally i think you are all awesome players...I almost never beat JR in singles...Pedro is masterful, Haz and Robin I must assume know what they are doing. But there are so many feuds on here now its ridiculous...
The purpose of the feedbacks is to keep people in check...I have one myself, and appologized for complaining in the game i got it in, but want it to stay there, so that if i find myself wanting to say something annoying, i know I may be called on it...This game naturally incites emotion, which is why its so good...Luck, strategy, and interaction with the other players are all important factors...but also can drive you crazy...
It is a shame to see players with hundreds of games and possibly as many hours in here feuding, often over one game or one event. I understand it, and mean no disrespect, because i have been guilty of it myself, but it really would be cool if there was less of it...myself included...
Have fun all...
I have to work on my points per game I think...
I wonder if i set up 10 new games right now how quickly they will fill...
JR; Games Completed: 964 / 2385 points = Avg of 1.4 points GAINED per game d'oh!
Hazmaniac; Games Completed: 239 / 1798 points = 3.3 points per game Rolling Eyes
Pedronicus; Games Completed: 352 / 2789 points = 7.1 points per game Applause
Robinette; Games Completed: 172 / 2648 points = 9.6 points per game Cool
AA Games 620(50pending) 1769 points= 1.2 pts per game
Personally i think you are all awesome players...I almost never beat JR in singles...Pedro is masterful, Haz and Robin I must assume know what they are doing. But there are so many feuds on here now its ridiculous...
The purpose of the feedbacks is to keep people in check...I have one myself, and appologized for complaining in the game i got it in, but want it to stay there, so that if i find myself wanting to say something annoying, i know I may be called on it...This game naturally incites emotion, which is why its so good...Luck, strategy, and interaction with the other players are all important factors...but also can drive you crazy...
It is a shame to see players with hundreds of games and possibly as many hours in here feuding, often over one game or one event. I understand it, and mean no disrespect, because i have been guilty of it myself, but it really would be cool if there was less of it...myself included...
Have fun all...
I have to work on my points per game I think...
I wonder if i set up 10 new games right now how quickly they will fill...
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 5:14 pmWho knew somebody could get so pissed off about feedback given to them over a non-hasbro risk game on a website. Might I suggest stepping away from the computer screen...go pop open a cold one and relax or something.
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 5:28 pmI guess I touched a nerve with you JR. A few things:
a) I wrote legitimate feedback from 1 game after you continiously performing the same cowardly moves on me time and again so you could retain your higher ranking and not lose your precious points (a fact that you do not deny). The only reason you are going on the offensive is because you know that it is true.
b) If you didn't like my play, you would have written negative feedback before which you didn't do. Only after I left you negative feedback, did you leave me one. Shows how vindictive and what type of baby you are. Further, you are the first person to have left me negative feedback in almost an entire year. That itself speaks volumes about how much I'm respected by the players that I play against. The fact that you can't accept another person's opinions shows how much of an ingrate you actually are.
c) Lastly, the fact that you have played 4X the amount of games that I have means nothing. It just means that you have more time on your hands. Sorry that my career as a lawyer prevents me from playing more but someone here has to do something with their life.
The bottom line is, is that you are wrong and the only people that know this are those we played against who don't and will never know the true motivations of your actions except for the fact that you inexplicably went after me with all your armies when you knew that you had no chance of winning.
a) I wrote legitimate feedback from 1 game after you continiously performing the same cowardly moves on me time and again so you could retain your higher ranking and not lose your precious points (a fact that you do not deny). The only reason you are going on the offensive is because you know that it is true.
b) If you didn't like my play, you would have written negative feedback before which you didn't do. Only after I left you negative feedback, did you leave me one. Shows how vindictive and what type of baby you are. Further, you are the first person to have left me negative feedback in almost an entire year. That itself speaks volumes about how much I'm respected by the players that I play against. The fact that you can't accept another person's opinions shows how much of an ingrate you actually are.
c) Lastly, the fact that you have played 4X the amount of games that I have means nothing. It just means that you have more time on your hands. Sorry that my career as a lawyer prevents me from playing more but someone here has to do something with their life.
The bottom line is, is that you are wrong and the only people that know this are those we played against who don't and will never know the true motivations of your actions except for the fact that you inexplicably went after me with all your armies when you knew that you had no chance of winning.