Page 1 of 1
Neutral FB question

Posted:
Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:48 pm
by KoolBak
Apparently we cannot reply to a neut FB like we can to a neg FB? Why is that? If that is true, I think it needs to be addressed......ie, that we SHOULD be able to enter a reply......

Posted:
Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:03 pm
by Hugh.G.Rection
not fair indeed..here is the story received a negative feedback from cyberdaniel responded to it making him look silly.He then removed it and left it as neutral didn't change anything he said.....an obvious attempt to have my response removed so everyone else wouldn't know how much of an assclown he is......but now everybody who reads this will know and in case you forgot CYBERDANIEL IS AN ASSCLOWN

Posted:
Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:36 pm
by Hugh.G.Rection
can we get a mod's perspective on this please?

Posted:
Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:39 pm
by KoolBak
On the ASSCLOWN factor or the Neut FB question? LOL!! You know my vote Huge, ol buddy! ;o)

Posted:
Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:43 pm
by wicked
yes you're both assclowns.
(Is that the perspective you wanted?)

Posted:
Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:50 pm
by Hugh.G.Rection
Koolbak,lmao
and mod lady Kool and I already know that were assclowns,could you please answer the ?

Posted:
Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:24 pm
by cyberdaniel
Hugh.G.Rection wrote:not fair indeed..here is the story received a negative feedback from cyberdaniel responded to it making him look silly.He then removed it and left it as neutral didn't change anything he said.....an obvious attempt to have my response removed so everyone else wouldn't know how much of an assclown he is......but now everybody who reads this will know and in case you forgot CYBERDANIEL IS AN ASSCLOWN
OK, I took it off, I didn't remove it from the negative feedback to lose your response, but because it wasn't worth a negative feedback. I posted it first of all because you couldn't even respond to my PM. That bothered me more than the fact you wanted to get to the final in any way. Its off, you can stop being a cry baby.

Posted:
Mon Oct 30, 2006 8:46 pm
by lackattack
Hmmm... I see value in putting feedback disputes in a public forum. The community can help reach a verdict and pressure people to change their feedback. All the mod has to do is post a sarcastic comment or two...
Seriously?

Posted:
Tue Oct 31, 2006 5:23 am
by KoolBak
I'll send ya a gift certificate for a weeks worth of La Poutine (with a side of fried spam!) if ya do it....
;o)

Posted:
Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:22 pm
by Hugh.G.Rection
cyberdaniel wrote:Hugh.G.Rection wrote:not fair indeed..here is the story received a negative feedback from cyberdaniel responded to it making him look silly.He then removed it and left it as neutral didn't change anything he said.....an obvious attempt to have my response removed so everyone else wouldn't know how much of an assclown he is......but now everybody who reads this will know and in case you forgot CYBERDANIEL IS AN ASSCLOWN
OK, I took it off, I didn't remove it from the negative feedback to lose your response, but because it wasn't worth a negative feedback. I posted it first of all because you couldn't even respond to my PM. That bothered me more than the fact you wanted to get to the final in any way. Its off, you can stop being a cry baby.
If you noticed I'm not the one who started this post,I wasn't crying I was bitching.I did not respond to your pm during the game b/c I was not sure if that would be considered a secret alliance you pressuring me to attack the leader in that game outside of game chat.Put it back as negative feedback so I can respond to it.

Posted:
Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:24 pm
by Hugh.G.Rection
KoolBak wrote:I'll send ya a gift certificate for a weeks worth of La Poutine (with a side of fried spam!) if ya do it....
;o)
Koolbak,I'll take some of that poutine but I don't know anyone who likes fried spam here in montreal.

Posted:
Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:13 pm
by wacicha
Hey I like spam almost as much as dog stew
and best dog for a stew ???

Posted:
Thu Nov 02, 2006 9:39 pm
by cyberdaniel
Hugh.G.Rection wrote:If you noticed I'm not the one who started this post,I wasn't crying I was bitching.I did not respond to your pm during the game b/c I was not sure if that would be considered a secret alliance you pressuring me to attack the leader in that game outside of game chat.Put it back as negative feedback so I can respond to it.
I didn't pm you to form a secret alliance and I'm sorry if you took it as that. I pmed you so I can get a clear view of your strategy. At the moment I've pmed you there was still enough chances to take him out, however you didn't even try to fight. After about 5 turns I figured you were going after second place but I still tried to make the game more chalanging.
As about the negative feedback I gave it because you didn't even respond after the game was over. I knew that you went after second place but a simple pm telling that you did that would of been enough to stop me giving a negative feedback.
I will not put it back as I was planing to take it off after a period.